基于博弈论的交通管理政策效用分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

U 491.2

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(70631002,70501023)


Analysis on Utility of Transportation Management Policy based on Game Theory
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    研究了考虑管理盲区影响下的交通管理政策效用。指出交通系统中存在不受交通管理政策影响的管理盲区,并以公务用车为例进行建模分析。首先,分析了政府的交通管理决策目标与出行者的出行选择目标,以缓解交通阻塞、维持区域经济活力作为政府的目标函数,以出行选择效用最大化作为出行者的目标函数,应用Stackelberg博弈模型描述政府及出行者双方的动态博弈平衡。然后,对出行选择效用进行假定,分析了中心区发达与否条件下的模型输出,揭示了公务用车对交通管理政策效用的影响。研究结论显示,对于发达的中心区,公务用车出行比例越高,限制个体交通的管理政策能够起到的效果就越差,且其他出行方式选择的综合效用也会显著降低。

    Abstract:

    This paper investigated the utility of transportation management policy considering impact of management blind zone. Blind zone is a special phenomenon which is almost free from management measures. Travel by government-owned cars (GOC) is a kind of blind zone which was taken as a case study. Firstly, objective of government and travelers were analyzed. The governmental objective was formulated as maximum vitality of the urban center and mitigation of traffic congestion. Travelers’ objective was to maximize their travel utility. Then Stackelberg game theory was adopted to describe the equilibrium between government and travelers. With assumption of travel utility function, the output of the game model was solved graphically considering whether the urban center was developed or not. It is shown that for a developed center, the higher the proportion of travel by GOC, the lower the utility of traffic management policy. And the utility of the whole transportation system is decreased while GOC proportion increases.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

云美萍,劳云腾,杨晓光.基于博弈论的交通管理政策效用分析[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2010,38(4):527~532

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2008-12-22
  • 最后修改日期:2010-01-23
  • 录用日期:2009-06-05
  • 在线发布日期: 2010-04-28
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码