基于声环境评价的公共交通优先设置形式比选研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

U491.1+7

基金项目:

国家“八六三”高技术研究发展计划(2006AA11Z202)


A Comparative Study on setting forms of Public Transport Priority based on sound environment impact assessment
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    根据各类公共交通优先设置形式的声环境特性,选择道路公交专用道(BUS)、道路交通快速公交系统(BRT)、高架地铁(MR),高架轻轨(LR)与高架低速磁悬浮(LM)进行声环境评价比选研究。首先分析了上述五种公交优先设置形式的噪声影响因素;然后选择了道路交通与轨道交通公交优先客运走廊的噪声计算方法,并确定了相关参数;在此基础上,进行了五种公共交通优先设置形式的噪声情景设置、噪声计算与对比分析。研究结果表明,在城市公交优先客运走廊上,公交优先设置形式对声环境的影响比客运量变化的影响大;在高峰小时客运量2~5万客运走廊上,轻轨具有声环境优势;在高峰小时客运量5万以上客运走廊上,地铁具有声环境优势;在声环境特别敏感区域,宜采用低速磁悬浮。

    Abstract:

    According to the sound environmental characteristic of different setting forms of public transport priority, Bus lane line, Bus Rapid Transit line, and elevated rail based Metro Rail, Light Rail, Low-speed Maglev are selected to compare with each other. Firstly, the sound influence factors of above mentioned five mode is analyzed; then the sound level calculated method and its parameters are determined; lastly, sound environment impact assessment of five setting forms of Public Transport Priority is carried out under different background scene. The main results of this research are: The setting form of Public Transport Priority has a greater sound environmental impact of the urban passenger corridor then passenger volume; the sound environment impact superiority lies in Light Rail to 20~50 thousand rush hour volume of urban passenger corridor and Metro Rail to 50 thousand more; in the most sound sensitive area, the Low-speed Maglev is the best choice.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李晔,汤峰.基于声环境评价的公共交通优先设置形式比选研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2009,37(10):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2009-05-25
  • 最后修改日期:2009-07-23
  • 录用日期:2009-07-14
  • 在线发布日期: 2010-01-19
  • 出版日期: