大跨度混合梁斜拉桥耐久性失效风险评估
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

同济大学土木工程学院,同济大学土木工程学院

中图分类号:

U448.2

基金项目:

江西省交通厅重点科技项目(2012C0002),国家重点基础研究发展计划973计划项目子课题(2013CB036300),国家自然科学基金资助项目(51378387)


Risk Assessment of Durability Failure for Large span Hybrid Girder Cable stayed Bridge
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [20]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为建立大跨度混合梁斜拉桥的耐久性失效风险评估体系,在分析耐久性和风险已有定义的基础上,从评估角度明确了耐久性失效风险的相关概念.考虑耐久性时间跨度大的特点,通过调研咨询识别了长期作用类型的风险因素,建立了大跨度混合梁斜拉桥耐久性失效风险源库.综合专家调查法、模糊综合评判法和层次分析法,研究了基于专家调查的模糊层次分析法用以评估耐久性失效风险.将重要度分析该概念引入耐久性失效风险评估,提出了耐久性失效风险重要度分析,该方法可以评价底层风险源对顶上风险事件的影响程度.以某长江大桥算例实践了上述风险评估体系,证明了其可行性.该体系可为大跨度混合梁斜拉桥的安全运营和预防性养护提供参考.

    Abstract:

    To construct a risk assessment system of durability failure for large span hybrid girder cable stayed bridge, new definitions related to durability failure risk were proposed from an assessment view based on the analysis of existing concepts of durability and risk. Considering the long time span of durability, risk factors which have long term effect were identified through investigation and consultation, thus the durability failure risk factor database of large span hybrid girder cable stayed bridge was built. Combining expert investigation method, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and analytic hierarchy process, the fussy analytic hierarchy process based on professor research was studied to assess the risk of durability failure. Introducing the analysis of importance rate to risk assessment of durability failure, durability failure risk importance analysis was proposed which can assess the impact on top risk event of bottom risk factors. Based on a certain Changjiang Bridge, the foregoing risk assessment system was practiced and the feasibility was proved, providing reference to security operation and preventive maintenance for large span hybrid girder.

    参考文献
    [1]交通运输部公路科学研究院. 公路桥梁耐久性状况调查分析报告[R].北京,2013.Research Institute of Highway of Ministry of Transport. Investigation and analysis on the durability situation of highway bridges in China[R].Beijing,2013.
    [2]中国工程院土木水利建筑学部. 混凝土结构耐久性设计与施工指南[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2004.Civil Engineering, Water Conservancy and Architecture Department of Chinese Academy of Engineering. The guide of durability design and construction of concrete structure [M]. Beijing:China Architecture Building Press,2004.
    [3]牛荻涛. 混凝土结构耐久性与寿命预测[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.Niu Di-tao. Durability and life prediction of concrete structures[M].Beijing:Science Press, 2000.
    [4]金伟良. 腐蚀混凝土结构学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011.Jin Wei-liang. Corroded concrete structures[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2011.
    [5]淳庆,邱洪兴. 在役铁路钢桥疲劳损伤机理、检测技术及疲劳寿命预测研究[J]. 特种结构,2005(12):80-84.Chun Qing, Qiu Hong-xing. Study on fatigue damage mechanism, test technique and prediction of fatigue life of existing railway steel bridge [J]. Special Structures, 2005(12):80-84.
    [6]Akgül F, Frangopol D M. Lifetime Performance Analysis of Existing Reinforced Concrete Bridges. I: Theory[J]. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2005, 11(2): 122-128.
    [7]Akgül F, Frangopol D M. Lifetime Performance Analysis of Existing Reinforced Concrete Bridges. II: Application[J]. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2005, 11(2): 129-141.
    [8]Akgül F, Frangopol D M. Lifetime Performance Analysis of Existing Steel Girder Bridge Superstructures[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004, 130:1875.
    [9]彭建新. 基于寿命周期成本的桥梁全寿命设计方法研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2009.Peng Jian-xin. Research on life-cycle design method of bridge based on life-cycle cost [D].Changsha: Hunan University, 2009.
    [10]Kim S, Frangopol D M, Zhu B. Probabilistic optimum inspection/repair planning to extend lifetime of deteriorating structures[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2011, 25(6): 534-544.
    [11]中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路桥梁和隧道工程设计安全风险评估指南[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2010.Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Design safety risk assessment guide of highway bridge and tunnel engineering[S]. Beijing:China Communications Press,2010.
    [12]中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路桥梁和隧道工程施工安全风险评估指南[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2011.Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Construction safety risk assessment guide of gighway bridge and tunnel engineering[S]. Beijing:China Communications Press,2011.
    [13]阮欣,陈艾荣,石雪飞. 桥梁工程风险评估[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2008.Ruan Xin,Chen Ai-rong,Shi Xue-fei. Risk assessment of bridge engineering[M]. Beijing:China Communications Press,2008.
    [14]中华人民共和国铁道部. 铁路混凝土结构耐久性设计规范(TB 10005-2010)[S].北京:中国铁道出版社,2011.Ministry of Railway of the People’s Republic of China. Code for durability design on concrete structure of railway(TB 10005-2010)[S]. Beijing:China Railway Press,2011.
    [15]中华人民共和国建设部. 混凝土结构耐久性设计规范(GB/T 50476-2008)[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008.Ministry of Construction of the People’s Republic of China. Code for durability design of concrete structures(GB/T 50476-2008) [S].Beijing:China Architecture Building Press,2008.
    [16]金伟良,赵羽习. 混凝土结构耐久性[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.Jin Wei-liang, Zhao Yu-xi. Durability of concrete structure[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2000.
    [17]同济大学. 大跨度混合梁斜拉桥病害及成因调研报告[R].上海,2014.Tongji University. Investigation report on the diseases and causes of long-span hybrid cable-stayed bridge [R].Shanghai,2014.
    [18]陈国华,吴武生,徐三元,刘坤. 基于WBS-RBS与AHP的跨海桥梁工程施工HSE风险评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2013(9):51-57.Chen Guo-hua, Wu Wu-sheng, Xu San-yuan, Liu Kun. Assessment HSE risk of during sea-crossing bridges project construction based on WBS-RBS and AHP [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013(9):51-57.
    [19]Saaty T L. The analytic hierarchy process[M]. New York: Mc Gtaw Hill, 1980.
    [20]宋满荣,李惠强. 模糊综合评判模型运算情形的探讨[J]. 华 中 科 技 大 学 学 报(城市科学版),2005(5):13-15.Song Man-rong,Li Hui-qiang. Discussion on the essence of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model[J]. Journal of HUST (Urban Science Edition) , 2005(5):13-15.
    相似文献
引用本文

林晶,肖汝诚.大跨度混合梁斜拉桥耐久性失效风险评估[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(3):0364~0370

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1904
  • 下载次数: 1119
  • HTML阅读次数: 15
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-14
  • 最后修改日期:2014-12-12
  • 录用日期:2014-12-01
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-03-18
文章二维码