隧道不同损伤状态二次衬砌预养护试验研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

同济大学 测绘与地理信息学院,同济大学,上海同岩土木工程科技有限公司,同济大学土木信息技术教育部工程研究中心

中图分类号:

U25

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(No. 51278377)


Experimental Study on Pre maintenance of Lining for Tunnel in Different Damage States
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [13]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    采用1∶10破坏性模型试验,研究隧道不同损伤状态衬砌预养护构件变形特性、破坏模式与承载力.研究表明:预养护试件整体破坏由原衬砌拱腰极限承载力控制;预养护损伤衬砌受力过程为“加载—原裂缝贯通—套拱拱顶裂缝贯通—试件破坏”,整体结构刚度逐渐退化.关键部位破坏顺序为“拱顶开裂—拱腰脆性断裂—拱顶延性破坏”.裂缝深度为1/3衬砌厚度损伤状态可作为合理预养护时机;不同损伤状态衬砌预养护曲率突变点一致,可作为加固构件养护控制基准;提出衬砌预养护构件破坏荷载与损伤状态关系简易计算公式,计算结果与试验误差约5%.

    Abstract:

    1∶10 destructive model tests were carried out to investigate deformation characteristics, mechanical response, crack propagation and bearing capacity of pre maintenance of cracking lining. The entire failure of pre maintenance is controlled by ultimate bearing capacity of hance of lining. The mechanical process of the reinforced lining is as follows: loading, crack coalescence of lining crown, crack coalescence of umbrella arch, and failure test. Stiffness of structure declines with the load increasing. Sequences of failure at crucial positions are cracking of vault, brittle fracture of arch hance and ductile failure of arch. When the depth of crack reaches a third of lining thickness, the damage state should be deemed as favorite time of pre maintenance. Under different damage conditions, the catastrophe point of reinforcement with umbrella arch is unanimous. It can be deemed as control criteria for maintenance of umbrella arch. A simplified formula is put forward to show relationship between failure load and damage state. The deviation is 5% approximately between the calculation results and the model test.

    参考文献
    [1]杨钊,余俊,潘晓明,等. 围岩不同模量特性对隧道支护结构的影响分析[J]. 同济大学学报:自然科学版, 2010,38(3):340.YANG Zhao,YU Jun,PANG Xiaoming,et al. Impact analysis of different modulus characteristic of surrounding rock on tunnel supporting structure [J]. Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science,2010,38(3):340.
    [2]刘靖,艾智勇,苏辉. 山岭隧道新奥法施工过程动态风险评估[J]. 同济大学学报:自然科学版,2012,40(8):1142.LIU Jing,AI Zhiyong,SU Hui. Dynamic risk assessment of mountain tunnel during NATM construction [J]. Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science,2012,40(8):1142.
    [3]钱七虎. 地下工程建设安全面临的挑战与对策[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(10):1945.QIAN Qihu. Challenges faced by underground projects construction safety and countermeasures [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2012,31(10):1945.
    [4]中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. JTG H12—2003 公路隧道养护技术规范[S]. 北京:人民交通出版社,2003.The Professional Standards Compilation Group of People’s Republic of China. JTG H12—2003 Highway tunnel maintenance technical specifications[S]. Beijing:China Communications Press,2003.
    [5]徐世烺,刘建强,张秀芳. 水工有压隧洞衬砌双K断裂理论分析及裂缝宽度计算[J]. 土木工程学报,2010,43(1):114.XU Shilang,LIU Jianqiang,ZHANG Xiufang. Double-K fracture theoretical analysis and crack w idth calculationof hydraulic pressure tunnel linng [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,2010,43(1):114.
    [6]汪波,李天斌,何川,等. 衬砌减薄对隧道结构承载力影响的模型试验研究[J]. 铁道学报,2013,35(2):106.WANG Bo,LI Tianbin,HE Chuan,et al. Model test of effect of lining thinning on tunnel structure bearing capacity [J]. Journal of the China Railway Society,2013,35(2):106.
    [7]丁万涛,李术才. 锈蚀对海底隧道锚固支护结构加固性能的影响[J]. 华南理工大学学报:自然科学版,2013,41(6):100.DING Wantao,LI Shucai. Effect of corrosion on reinforcement performance of anchorage support structure of subsea tunnel [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology:Natural Science Edition,2013,41(6):100.
    [8]黄大维,周顺华,宫全美,等. 软土地区地铁不同结构间差异沉降特点分析[J]. 同济大学学报:自然科学版,2013,41(1):95.HUANG Dawei,ZHOU Shunhua,GONG Quanmei,et al. Characteristic analysis of non-uniform settlement for different structures of metro in soft soil districts [J]. Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science,2013,41(1):95.
    [9] 关宝树. 隧道工程维修管理要点集[M]. 北京:人民交通出版社,2004.GUAN Baoshu. Collection of key points for maintenance management of tunnel engineering [M]. Beijing:China Communications Press,2004.
    [10]李培楠,刘俊,苏锋,等. 任意形状隧道围岩应力与位移的解析延拓求解[J]. 同济大学学报:自然科学版,2013,41(10):1483.LI Peinan,LIU Jun,SU Feng,et al. Analytical continuation method for solving stress and displacement of surrounding rock buried tunnel excavation with arbitrary shape section [J]. Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science,2013,41(10):1483.
    [11]Buratti N,Ferracuti B,Savoia M. Concrete crack reduction in tunnel linings by steel fibre-reinforced concretes [J]. Construction and Building Materials,2013,44:249.
    [12]Lee C H,Chiu Y C,Wang T T,et al. Application and validation of simple image-mosaic technology for interpreting cracks on tunnel lining [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2013,34:61.
    [13]孙庆,杨敏,冉侠,等. 隧道开挖对周围土体及桩基影响的试验研究[J]. 同济大学学报:自然科学版,2011,39(7):889.SUN Qing,YANG Min,RAN Xia,et al. Test study on tunnelling- induced soil movements and pile responses [J]. Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science,2011,39(7):889.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

刘学增,刘文艺,桑运龙,何本国.隧道不同损伤状态二次衬砌预养护试验研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(5):0706~0713

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1708
  • 下载次数: 1143
  • HTML阅读次数: 44
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-28
  • 最后修改日期:2015-01-28
  • 录用日期:2014-12-01
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-05-29
文章二维码