硬塑高黏度地层盾构施工土体改良试验研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

同济大学土木工程学院 上海隧道工程股份有限公司,上海隧道工程股份有限公司,上海隧道工程股份有限公司盾构分公司,同济大学土木工程学院

中图分类号:

TD822.3

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(51378388);上海市科学技术委员会重点科研项目(14DZ1207900)


Experimental Study on Soil Conditioning of Shield Construction in Hardplastic Highviscosity Layer
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [15]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以上海⑥号土中盾构施工为研究背景,进行硬塑高黏度土体改良的室内试验.选择3种添加剂研究其对渣土性能的影响,并综合分析其最优注入率范围.研究表明:单独使用泡沫需在增加土样含水率到30.0%条件下,控制泡沫注入率(质量比,下同)为30.0%时较好;高分子材料和减黏剂则需在同样含水率下使其注入率分别为6.0%、5.5%时最佳;高分子材料和泡沫组合在高分子材料注入率、泡沫注入率分别为3%、20%时,减黏剂和泡沫组合在减黏剂注入率、泡沫注入率分别为3%、15%时效果更为合适.利用该配比方案进行现场掘进试验,所得结果可为类似地层盾构施工土体改良提供参考.

    Abstract:

    A series of soil conditioning laboratory tests with three types of additives were performed to investigate and assess the conditioned effect of hardplastic highviscosity soil in Shanghai ⑥ layer, and analyze the optimal injection rate ranges synthetically. It is shown that the optimum foam injection ratio is 30.0% under 30.0% moisture content (MC). While the optimum injection ratios of polymer and detackifier are 6.0% and 5.5% respectively under the same MC. Moreover, the optimum injection ratios of combination materials with polymer and foam are 3% (polymer) and 20% (foam) respectively, and the optimum injection ratio of combination materials with detackifier and foam are 3% for detackifier and 15% for foam respectively. Succeeding field tests show that the optimum injection ratios of additives significantly improve the performance of earth pressure balanced (EPB) excavation and can be used as guidelines under such soil conditions.

    参考文献
    [1]张凤祥,朱合华,傅德明.盾构隧道[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2004.Zhang Fengxiang, Zhu Hehua, Fu Deming. Shield tunneling method[M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2004.
    [2]唐益群,宋永辉,周念清,等.土压平衡盾构在砂性土中施工问题的试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(1):52–56.Tang Yiqun, Song Yonghui, Zhou Nianqing, et al. Experimental research on troubles of EPB shield construction in Sandy Soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(1): 52–56.
    [3]Milligan, G. Lubrication and soil conditioning in tunnelling, pipe jacking, and microtunnelling state of the art review[OL]// London: Geotechnical Consulting Group, www-civil.eng.ox.ac.uk. 2000.
    [4]魏康林.土压平衡盾构施工中泡沫和膨润土改良上体的微观机理分析[J].现代隧道技术,2007,44(1):73–77.Wei Kanglin. Micro-Mechanism Analysis for the Soil improvement by Foam and Bentonite in EPB Shield Tunneling[J]. Modern Tunneling Technology, 2007, 44(1): 73–77.
    [5]乔国刚.上压平衡盾构用新型发泡剂的开发与泡沫改良上体研究[D].北京:中国矿业大学,2010.Qiao Guogang. Development of New Foam Agent for EPB Shield Machine and Foamed-Soil Modification[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology, 2010.
    [6]朱 伟,郭 涛,魏康林.盾构用气泡的性能及对开挖上体改良效果影响[J].地下空间与工程学报,2006,2(4):571–577.Zhu Wei, Guo Tao, Wei Kanglin. The Performance of Foams in Shield Tunneling Method and lts Effect on the Soil Conditioning[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2006, 2(4): 571–577.
    [7]闫 鑫,龚秋明,姜厚停.土压平衡盾构施工中泡沫改良砂土的试验研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2010,6(3):449–453.Yan Xin, Gong Qiuming, Jiang Houting. Soil conditioning for earth-pressure balanced shields excavation in sand layer[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2010, 6(3): 449–453.
    [8]姜厚停,龚秋明,杜修力.卵石地层土压平衡盾构施工土体改良试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2013,35(2):284–292.Jiang Houting, Gong Qiuming, Du Xiuli. Experimental study on soil conditioning in cobble layer by use of earth pressure balanced machine[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(2): 284–292.
    [9]Nikol, K. The effects of soil conditioning agents on fine and coarse-grained soils with applications in earth pressure balance machine tunneling[D]. Toronto: Department of Civil Engineering University of Toronto, 2007.
    [10]林 键.土体改良降低土压平衡式盾构刀盘扭矩的机理研究[D].南京:河海大学,2006.Lin Jian. Study on reduction of cutterhead torque in EPB shield with soil conditioning[D]. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2006.
    [11]Bezuijen, A., Schamince, P.E.L., kleinjan, J.A. Additive testing for earth pressure balance shields[C]. Geotechnical Engineering for Transportation Infrastructure, Balkema. 1999, 1991–1996.
    [12]黄德中.超大直径土压平衡盾构施工土体改良试验研究[J].现代隧道技术,2011(4):65–71.Huang Dezhong. Research of soil improvement during super-large diameter earth pressure balanced shield[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2011(4): 65–71.
    [13]Miguel, P. Soil conditioning for sand[J]. Tunnels and Tunnelling International, 2003(7): 40–42.
    [14]Raffaele, V., Ckaudio, O.I., Daniele, P. Soil conditioning of sand for EPB applications: a laboratory research[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23(3): 308–317.
    [15]宋克志,汪 波,孔 恒,等.无水砂卵石地层土压平衡盾构施工泡沫技术研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(13):2327–2332.Song Kezhi, Wang Bo, Kong Heng, et al. Study on foam technology during shield excavation in sandy cobble bed without water[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(13): 2327–2332.
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

李培楠,黄德中,黄俊,丁文其.硬塑高黏度地层盾构施工土体改良试验研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2016,44(1):0059~0066

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1647
  • 下载次数: 1001
  • HTML阅读次数: 46
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-25
  • 最后修改日期:2015-11-16
  • 录用日期:2015-09-14
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-01-26
文章二维码