建筑业全要素生产率的增长特征及其影响因素
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

同济大学,同济大学,同济大学

中图分类号:

F407.9

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(71272046);国家国际科技合作计划项目(2011DFG73520)


Growth Characteristics and Impacting Factors of the Total Factor Productivity in the Construction Industry
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [20]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    综合采用基于数据包络分析(DEA)的Malmquist生产率指数分析、β收敛回归检验、灰色关联度分析等方法构建了对建筑业全要素生产率(TFP)增长指数进行综合测算并分析其收敛性及影响因素的框架,对1993—2012年中国建筑业全要素生产率的增长特征及其影响因素进行了分析.研究发现该时期建筑业TFP的年均增长率为4.6%,技术进步是TFP增长的主要源泉,技术效率则未有明显提升;TFP的变动具有明显的阶段性特征,其增长速度在2004—2007年处于最高水平,随后呈下降趋势;全国及东部、中部地区各省份之间TFP增长具有绝对β收敛,西部地区各省份之间的收敛性则不显著;经济环境、行业科技能力、行业市场结构等3类因素的变动与TFP增长存在关联,其中,外资建筑企业比例指数与TFP增长指数具有最高的灰色关联度.

    Abstract:

    Comprehensively using the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) based Malmquist index method, the β convergence testing model and the grey relational analysis process, this paper establishes a framework for measuring the total factor productivity (TFP) growth index as well as analyzing the growth convergence and related impacting factors, and uses the framework to empirically investigate the growth characteristics and impacting factors of TFP growth in the Chinese construction industry during the period 1993—2012. The findings show that the average annual TFP growth rate during this period is 4.6%, which is principally driven by the technological change, and that the technological efficiency does not increase substantially. It is also shown that there are significant differences among the changes of TFP during different sub periods. The growth rate reaches its highest level during the period 2004—2007, and then gradually decreases. β convergence tests indicate that there are significant convergences among the TFP growths in the national wide and eastern and central parts of China. The convergence of TFP growth in Western China, however, is not found to be significant. Factors in the areas of economic environment, industry research and technology capability, and industry structure could influence the growth of TFP, and the output percentage index of foreign funded construction enterprises is found to possess the highest grey relational grade with the TFP growth index.

    参考文献
    [1]Xu T, Tiong R. L, Chew D A, Smith N J. Development Model for Competitive Construction Industry in the People’s Republic of China [J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2005, 131(7): 844-853.
    [2]Smyth H. Construction Industry Performance Improvement Programmes: The UK Case of Demonstration Projects in the 'Continuous Improvement' Programme [J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2010, 28(3): 255-270.
    [3]Pellegrino R, Costantino N, Pietroforte R, Sancilio S. Construction of Multi-Storey Concrete Structures in Italy: Patterns of Productivity and Learning Curves [J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2009, 30(2): 103-115.
    [4]Eastman C M, Sacks R. Relative Productivity in the AEC Industries in the United States for On-Site and Offsite Activities [J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2008, 134(7): 517-526.
    [5]Jarkas A, Bitar C. Factors Affecting Construction Labor Productivity in Kuwait [J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2012, 138(7): 811-820.
    [6]Rojas E M, Aramvareekul P. Is Construction Labor Productivity Really Declining? [J] Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2003, 129(1): 41-46.
    [7]Ruddock L, Ruddock S. Evaluation of Trends in the UK Construction Industry Using Growth and Productivity Accounts. Construction Management and Economics, 2011, 29(12): 1229-1239.
    [8]Abdel-Wahab M, Vogl B. Trends of Productivity Growth in the Construction Industry Across Europe, US and Japan [J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2011, 29(6): 635-644.
    [9]Lam P L, Lam T. Total Factor Productivity Measures for Hong Kong Telephone [J]. Telecommunications Policy, 2005, 29(1): 53-68.
    [10]Kerstens K, Managi S. Total Factor Productivity Growth and Convergence in the Petroleum Industry: Empirical Analysis Testing for Convexity [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(1): 196-206.
    [11]Li Y, Liu C. Malmquist Indices of Total Factor Productivity Changes in the Australian Construction Industry [J]. Construction management and economics, 2010, 28(9): 933-945.
    [12]Crawford P, Vogl B. Measuring Productivity in the Construction Industry [J]. Building Research Information, 2006, 34(3): 208-219.
    [13]李伟,李光辉,李月娟,贾培云. 基于DEA模型的我国各省区建筑业生产效率评价实证研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2009, 26(21): 153-155.
    [14]李忠富, 邹心勇, 李国良. 中国建筑业全要素生产率的变迁: 1996-2005年实证分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2008, 41(11): 106-111.
    [15]Xue X, Shen Q, Wang Y, Lu J. Measuring the Productivity of the Construction Industry in China by Using DEA-Based Malmquist Productivity Indices. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2008, 134(1): 64-71.
    [16]Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429-444.
    [17]Fare R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z. Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries [J]. The American Economic Review, 1994, 84(1): 66-83.
    [18]Caves D W, Christensen L R, Diewert W E. The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity [J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1982, 50(6):1393-1414.
    [19]Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X. Convergence [J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1992, 100(2): 223-251.
    [20]刘思峰, 党耀国, 方志耕, 谢乃明. 灰色系统理论及其应用 (第五版) [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

谭丹,王广斌,曹冬平.建筑业全要素生产率的增长特征及其影响因素[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(12):1901~1907

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:2789
  • 下载次数: 979
  • HTML阅读次数: 63
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-06
  • 最后修改日期:2015-10-19
  • 录用日期:2015-06-11
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-12-28
文章二维码