不同区划方案对宏观交通事故建模的影响
作者:
作者单位:

中南大学,中南大学 交通运输工程学院,中南大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

U491.31

基金项目:

国家自然科学(71371192);霍英东教育基金会高等院校青年教师基金应用研究课题(142005);湖南省杰出青年基金项目(2015JJ1017).


Influence of Zonal Configurations on Macrolevel Traffic Safety Modeling
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    依托美国佛罗里达州Hillsborough县历史数据,分别提取人口普查单元组、交通分析小区、人口普查区、邮政投递区等4种区划方案的事故数据、路网交通特征数据和经济社会人口数据;基于贝叶斯方法构建负二项条件自回归模型,从模型拟合度、模型估计参数、小区事故黑面识别等3个方面定量评价不同区划方案对宏观交通安全分析结果的影响.研究表明:宏观交通安全分析结果会随着空间单元划分方式不同而产生显著差异;小区数目越少,事故预测越为准确;对比人口普查单元组、人口普查区和邮政投递区,基于交通分析小区的模型拟合度最低;变量中等家庭收入对分区规模最不敏感,其参数估计结果具有稳健性和可靠性.

    Abstract:

    Based on the historic data from Hillsborough County, Florida, U.S., the zonelevel factors including crashes counts, road network, traffic pattern, and various social economic factors were explicitly collected for four different zoning schemes, i.e. block groups, traffic analysis zones, census tracts, and zone improvement plan codes. Then, a Bayesian negative binomial model with conditional autoregressive prior was developed for each spatial units, respectively. The impacts of zonal variations on macrolevel safety modeling were investigated mainly from three aspects, i.e. model performance, model parameter estimates, as well as crash hotspots identification. Results revealed that statistical results based on different aggregation configurations could be significantly different. Zoning schemes with less number of zones tend to have higher crash prediction precision. Compared with block groups, census tracts, and zone improvement plan codes, traffic analysis zones level model preforms worst in terms of model goodness of fit. The variable of median household income shows consistently significant effects on crash frequency and is robust to variation in data aggregation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

黄合来,许鹏鹏,翟晓琪.不同区划方案对宏观交通事故建模的影响[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2016,44(3):0377~0382

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-23
  • 最后修改日期:2015-12-25
  • 录用日期:2015-10-10
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-03-25
  • 出版日期: