基于高逼真驾驶模拟器雾霾天气下跟驰行为分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

同济大学,同济大学,同济大学

中图分类号:

U491

基金项目:

(71271155)


Analysis of Car Following Behaviors Under Hazy Weather Conditions Based on High Fidelity Driving Simulator
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [14]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为研究雾霾天气下车辆跟驰行为,基于8自由度高逼真驾驶模拟器,设置晴天和雾霾天两个实验场景,采集不同交通状态下跟驰驾驶行为数据,分析车头时距、车头间距、车头延迟时距、加速度、减速度等跟驰行为关键变量.实验结果表明,雾霾天气显著影响了跟驰行为,最大车头间距在自由流、拥挤流和阻塞流跟驰状态下分别增加了8.7%、19.4%和25.6%;自由流跟驰状态下最小车头间距减小了13.0%;阻塞流跟驰状态下最小车头时距减小了47.9%,但延迟时距及其离散性增加了15.5%和28.2%;雾霾天气下后车的加速行为更为谨慎.不同交通状态下的跟驰行为存在显著差异.随着跟驰车速增加,最大、最小车头间距及其离散性显著增加;最大、最小车头时距及其离散性则呈先增加后减小趋势,延迟时距显著增加.

    Abstract:

    In order to investigate drivers’ car following behaviors under hazy weather conditions, by using the high fidelity driving simulator with a motion system of 8 degrees of freedom, two scenarios, namely clear weather conditions and hazy weather conditions, were established to collect and analyze the key variables of car following behaviors including the time/distance headway, delay time and acceleration/deceleration rate at different car following stages under different traffic conditions. Compared to the clear weather conditions, the results indicate that hazy weather conditions have significant effects on drivers’ car following behaviors; the maximum distance headway significantly increases by 8.7%, 19.4%, and 25.6% under car following stages in case of freeflow conditions, congested conditions, and jam conditions, respectively. The minimum distance headway significantly increases by 13.0% under car following stage in case of freeflow conditions. The minimum time headway significantly decreases by 47.9%, and the mean value and the discreteness of the delay time significantly increases by 15.5% and 28.2% respectively, under car following stage in case of jam conditions. Drivers become more cautious in accelerating under hazy weather conditions. There exist significant differences in car following behavior at car following stages under different traffic conditions. With the increasing speeds, both the mean value and the discreteness of the maximum/minimum distance headway and the delay time increase significantly, while the time headway decreases followed by increasing afterwards.

    参考文献
    [1]袁媛, 周宁芳, 李崇银, 中国华北雾霾天气与超强El Nino事件的相关性研究. 地球物理学报, 2017. 60(1): p. 11-21.Yuan, Y., Zhou, N., Li, C., Correlation between haze in North China and super EI Ni?o events. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2017. 60(1): p. 11-21.
    [2]王晶, 刘小明, 李德慧, 驾驶模拟器现状及应用研究. 交通标准化, 2008(11): p. 160-163.Wang, J., Liu, X., Li, D., Driving Simulator Status Quo and Application Research. Communitions Standardization, 2008(11): p. 160-163.
    [3]涂辉招, 李振飞, 孙立军, 驾驶模拟器运动系统对自由驾驶行为的影响分析. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版, 2015. 43(11): p. 1696-1702.Tu, H., Li,Z., Sun, L., Effects of Motion System of Driving Simualtor on Free Driving Behaviors. Journal of Tongji University: National Science, 2015. 43(11): p. 1696-1702.
    [4]Tu, H., Li, Z., Li H., et al, Driving Simulator Fidelity and Emergency Driving Behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015(2518): p. 113-121.
    [5]Kang, J.J., R. Ni, G.J. Andersen, Effects of Reduced Visibility from Fog on Car-Following Performance. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008. 2069(-1): p. 9-15.
    [6]何莎, 闫学东, 庞洪涛等, 雾天对驾驶行为的影响研究——避撞驾驶行为. 交通信息与安全, 2014. 32(5): p. 126-129.He, S., Yan, X., Pang, H., Effects of Fog Conditions on Driving Behaviors-Crash Avoidance Driving Behaviors. Journal of Transportation Information and Safety, 2014. 32(5): p. 126-129.
    [7]Evans, Leonard, Traffic safety. 2004: Science Serving Society. 256-256.
    [8]Cavallo, V., Perceptual distortions when driving in fog. in Proc., 2nd International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies. 2002.
    [9]周伟, 行车间距分析(英文). 东南大学学报(英文版), 2003. 19(4): p. 378-381.Zhou, W., Analysis of distance headway. Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2003. 19(4): p. 378-381.
    [10]Hoogendoorn, R., Tamminga, G., Hoogendoorn, SP., et al., Longitudinal driving behavior under adverse weather conditions: Adaptation effects, model performance and freeway capacity in case of fog. in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2010 13th International IEEE Conference on. 2010. IEEE.
    [11]Zhang, X., G.H. Bham, Estimation of driver reaction time from detailed vehicle trajectory data. MOAS, 2007. 7: p. 574-579.
    [12]Bella, F., Parameters for evaluation of speed differential: contribution using driving simulator. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007(2023): p. 37-43.
    [13]Reyner, L., Wells, SJ., Mortlock, V., et al., ‘Post-lunch’sleepiness during prolonged, monotonous driving—Effects of meal size. Physiology behavior, 2012. 105(4): p. 1088-1091.
    [14]Yang, Q., Overton, R., Han, L., et al., The influence of curbs on driver behaviors in four-lane rural highways—A driving simulator based study. Accident Analysis Prevention, 2013. 50: p. 1289-1297.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

时恒,涂辉招,高坤.基于高逼真驾驶模拟器雾霾天气下跟驰行为分析[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2018,46(03):0326~0333

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1496
  • 下载次数: 1134
  • HTML阅读次数: 818
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-01
  • 最后修改日期:2017-08-20
  • 录用日期:2017-11-15
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-03-27
文章二维码