全球参考站网窄巷非校准相位延迟
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

同济大学测绘与地理信息学院,同济大学测绘与地理信息学院

中图分类号:

P228.4

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划(2016YFB0501802),国家自然科学基金(41622401, 41574023)


Timevarying Property of Narrowlane Uncalibrated Phase Delays Products Estimated from a Global Reference Station Network
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [17]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    窄巷非校准相位延迟(UPD)产品的质量和可用性是影响精密单点定位模糊度固定(PPPAR)效率的重要因素.采用全球108个国际GPS服务(International GPS Service,IGS)测站观测数据,计算了基于全球参考站网的窄巷UPD产品,分析了窄巷UPD产品的变化特性,其单日变化量最大可达0.6周.通过分析UPD改正后的模糊度残差,论证了UPD产品和用户端模糊度均受到因未被恰当模型化而造成的残余误差的影响,且UPD的时变特性与各参考站残余系统误差有关.最后,采用4个用户站进行PPPAR实验分析UPD产品的可用性,以模糊度固定失败率、固定错误率和首次固定时间为评估指标,结果表明,全球参考站网窄巷UPD产品的最佳使用时限不大于30 min.

    Abstract:

    The quality and availability of narrowlane (NL) uncalibrated phase delays (UPD) products are the key factors to precise point positioning ambiguity resolution (PPPAR) service. In this paper, the GPS observations from 108 world distributed International GPS Service (IGS) reference stations were employed to calculate the widelane (WL) and NL UPD products. The variations of NL UPDs were evaluated and the results show that the maximum daily variation can reach 0.6 cycles. Then, the residuals of ambiguities corrected with UPDs were analyzed to demonstrate that ambiguities and UPDs are both influenced by the unmodeled atmosphere errors. We found the timevarying property of NL UPD is relevant to the residual atmospheric errors of the selected reference stations used to estimate UPDs. Moreover, the real observation data of four IGS stations were processed in PPPAR mode to demonstrate the time availability of UPD products. The statistical results of timetofirstfix (TTFF), unfix rate and incorrect fix rate were adopted to evaluate the performance of PPPAR service. According to the experiment results, we concluded that the effective time limit of NL UPD products should be no more than 30 minutes.

    参考文献
    [1] Rocken C, Johnson J, Hove T V, et al. Atmospheric water vapor and geoid measurements in the open ocean with GPS[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, 32(12)
    [2] Calais E, Han J Y, Demets C, et al. Deformation of the North American plate interior from a decade of continuous GPS measurements[J]. 2006, 111(B6)
    [3] Li X, Ge M, Zhang Y, et al. Real-time coseismic displacements from tightly-integrated processing of high-rate GNSS and strong motion data[C]// EGU. 2013.
    [4] Kao S P, Chen Y C, Ning F S. A MARS-based method for estimating regional 2-D ionospheric VTEC and receiver differential code bias[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2014, 53(2):190-200.
    [5] Collins P, Lahaye F, Héroux P, et al. Precise point positioning with ambiguity resolution using the decoupled clock model[J]. Proceedings of International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, 2008:1315-1322.
    [6] Laurichesse D, Mercier F, Berthias J P, et al. Integer Ambiguity Resolution on Undifferenced GPS Phase Measurements and Its Application to PPP and Satellite Precise Orbit Determination[J]. Navigation, 2009, 56(2):135–149.
    [7] Shi J, Gao Y. A comparison of three PPP integer ambiguity resolution methods[J]. GPS Solutions, 2014, 18(4):519-528.
    [8] Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, et al. Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2008, 82(7): 389-399.
    [9] Li X, Zhang X. Improving the estimation of uncalibrated fractional phase offsets for PPP ambiguity resolution[J]. Journal of Navigation, 2012, 65(03): 513-529.
    [10] Pan L, Xiaohong Z, Fei G. Ambiguity resolved precise point positioning with GPS and BeiDou[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2017, 91(1): 25-40.
    [11] 张小红, 李盼, 李星星,等. 宽巷载波相位模糊度小数偏差时变特性分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2013, 42(6):798-803.ZHANG Xiaohong, LI Pan, LI Xingxing, et al. An analysis of time-varying property of widelane carrier phase ambiguity fractional bias[J] Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2013,42(6):798-803.
    [12] Geng J, Meng X, Dodson A H, et al. Integer ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning: method comparison[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2010, 84(9):569-581.
    [13] Li X, Ge M, Zhang H, et al. A method for improving uncalibrated phase delay estimation and ambiguity-fixing in real-time precise point positioning [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2013, 87(5):405-416.
    [14] Li Y, Gao Y, Shi J. Improved PPP ambiguity resolution by COES FCB estimation[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2016, 90(5):437-450.
    [15] Li B, Shen Y, Feng Y, et al. GNSS ambiguity resolution with controllable failure rate for long baseline network RTK[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2014, 88(2):99-112.
    [16] Zhang Z, Li B, Shen Y. Comparison and analysis of unmodelled errors in GPS and BeiDou signals[J]. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2016, 8(1) :41–48.
    [17] 郭向欣, 李敏. IGS精密钟差天跳变影响及消除方法研究[C]. 中国卫星导航学术年会. 2014.Guo Xiangxin, Li Min, Research of IGS Precise Clock Offset Day Boundary Effects and Eliminating Methods[C] China Satellite Navigation Conference, 2014
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

王思遥,李博峰.全球参考站网窄巷非校准相位延迟[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2018,46(04):0542~0549

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1728
  • 下载次数: 1191
  • HTML阅读次数: 688
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-04
  • 最后修改日期:2018-03-08
  • 录用日期:2018-01-10
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-05-11
文章二维码