基于不同参考框架的GPS卫星天线校验
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

中国科学院上海天文台,中国科学院上海天文台,上海市政工程设计研究总院(集团)有限公司

中图分类号:

170.3550

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(填写项目编号)


Calibration of GPS Satellite Antenna Based on Different Reference Frames
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [11]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    重新估计了基于不同参考框架的GPS卫星天线 PCO(相位中心偏差)和PCV(相位中心变化)参数.计算过程中,通过固定测站天线的PCO和PCV,并将测站坐标强约束至不同的参考框架之下,降低了GPS卫星天线参数和接收机天线参数以及参考框架参数之间的相关性.结果显示,基于不同参考框架的同类型卫星天线PCV差异的平均值为0.726 mm;与IGS发布值差异的平均值为0.844 mm;基于新公布的IGS14参考框架的GPS卫星天线PCO估计结果与IGS (国际GNSS服务)发布值差异的平均值为-14.4 mm,基于IGb08参考框架的卫星天线PCO估计结果与IGS发布值差异的平均值为-16.8 mm.以上结果表明,本措施提高了GPS卫星相位中心PCO/PCV的一致性,从而也能提高GNSS(global navigation satellite system) 技术用于框架传递的连续性.

    Abstract:

    GPS satellites antenna PCO(phase center offset) and PCV(phase center variation) were reestimated based on station coordinates under different reference frames. The correlations among GPS satellite antenna parameters, receiver antenna parameters and reference frame scales were reduced by fixing receiver antenna PCO/PCV and constraining station coordinate to given reference frame tightly. Results show that the mean difference of blockspecific satellite antenna PCV based on different reference frames is 0.726 mm. Comparing with the satellite antenna PCV released by IGS based on IGS00, the mean blockspecific PCV difference between IGS value and the reestimated is 0.844 mm. Comparing to the IGS values, GPS reestimated satellite antenna PCO has an average bias of -14.4 mm and -16.8 mm for the reestimated satellite antenna PCO based on IGS14 and IGS08, respectively. The reestimated PCO/PCV values could improve their inerconsistency and contribute to the GNSS based reference frames densification.

    参考文献
    [1]朱智勤, 李征航, 刘万科. 相位中心改正模式的转变对GPS数据处理的影响[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2009(11):1301-1304.
    [2]胡一帆, 胡弦, 陈俊平,等. GPS卫星和接收机天线绝对PCO、PCV对高精度基线解算的影响分析[J]. 测绘通报,2017(5):11-16.HU Yifan, HU Xian, CHEN Junping, et al. Analysis of GPS Satellite and Receiver Antenna Absolute PCO/PCV Influence on High Precise Baseline Resolution [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2017(5): 11-16.
    [3]胡一帆.卫星导航天线PCO和PCV在轨标定[D].同济大学,2017HU Yifan. The calibration of antenna PCO/PCV based on navigation satellite orbit[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2017
    [4]Bilich A L, Mader G L. GNSS Absolute Antenna Calibration at the National Geodetic Survey[J]. American Geophysical Union, 2009:3080.
    [5]Schmid R, Rothacher M. Estimation of elevation-dependent satellite antenna phase center variations of GPS satellites[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2003, 77(7):440-446.
    [6]Wübbena G, Schmitz M, Boettcher G, et al. Absolute GNSS Antenna Calibration with a Robot: Repeatability of Phase Variations, Calibration of GLONASS and Determination of Carrier-to-Noise Pattern[J]. 2006.
    [7] Springer T A. Modeling and validating orbits and clocks using the Global Positioning System[J]. 2000.
    [8]Dilssner et al., 2016:COMMENT Evaluating the pre-flight GPS Block IIR/IIR-M antenna phase pattern measurements, IGS Workshop 2016
    [9]Schmid R, Rothacher M, Thaller D, et al. Absolute phase center corrections of satellite and receiver antennas[J]. Gps Solutions, 2005, 9(4):283-293.
    [10]Schmid R, Steigenberger P, Gendt G, et al. Generation of a consistent absolute phase-center correction model for GPS receiver and satellite antennas[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2007, 81(12):781-798.
    [11]Maorong Ge, GerdGendt. Estimation and validation of the IGS absolute antenna phase center variations, IGS Workshop 2004
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

陈俊平,胡一帆,张帅,刘姣.基于不同参考框架的GPS卫星天线校验[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2018,46(10):1448~1454

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1323
  • 下载次数: 834
  • HTML阅读次数: 1127
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-05
  • 最后修改日期:2018-08-26
  • 录用日期:2018-06-27
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-11-09
文章二维码