波音平整度评价方法的局限性分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

同济大学 道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室;同济大学 交通运输工程学院,同济大学 道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室,同济大学 道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室,同济大学 道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室

中图分类号:

V351.11;U416.217

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(51678444)


Application Limitation of Boeing Bump to Evaluation Runway Roughness
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [19]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    探究了我国机场道面平整度评价方法中新加入的波音平整度评价方法,提出了具体应用时的几点局限性.在介绍波音平整度评价方法的同时,开发波音平整度指数(Boeing Bump Index,BBI)的求解程序,并基于ADAMS/Aircraft平台,建立典型机型的虚拟样机模型,基于世界范围实测的37条机场跑道纵断面数据,分析了BBI指标和评价标准在某些方面存在的问题.结果表明,BBI指标不能有效处理跑道上存在的多个连续隆起的问题,而应辅以反应类的平整度评价指标综合评价,且最不利滑行速度、单一的评价指标和评价机型使得该方法的评价标准过于宽松,应适当修正.

    Abstract:

    Aiming at the situation that Boeing Bump will be the new method to evaluate airport pavement roughness in China, an analysis was made of the limitations to Boeing Bump's application. Boeing Bump was introduced in detail and the procedure of Boeing Bump Index (BBI) was developed meantime, based on ADAMS/Aircraft, the virtual prototype of typical aircraft was modeled, and with the field longitudinal profiles of 37 runways around the world, some problems of BBI and its criteria were explored. The results show that BBI has no ability to deal with multiple bumps on the runway, and is supposed to combine with some reaction evaluation index; some reasons, including the most unfavorable taxiing speed, single evaluation index and single evaluation aircraft, will make the criteria too loose, and the criteria of BBI should be corrected appropriately.

    参考文献
    [1]凌建明,张光辉,刁永海,等. MH/T 5024-2009,民用机场道面评价技术管理规范[S]. 北京,中国民用航空局, 2009.LING Jianming, ZHANG Guanghui, DIAO Yonghai, et al. MH/T 5024-2009, Technical Specifications of Aerodrome Pavement Evaluation and Management[S]. Beijing, Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2009.
    [2]SAYERS M W, GILLESPIE T D, QUEIROZ A V. The International Road Roughness experiment:establishing correlation and calibration standard for measurements[R]. Washington DC: World Bank Technical Paper, 1986.
    [3]Transport Canada. Measurement and evaluation of runway roughness. Civil Aviation, Standards. Advisory Circular AC 302-023, 16 September 2015.
    [4]凌建明,刘诗福,袁捷,等. 不平整激励下机场道面和公路路面平整度评价综合分析[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2017,45(04):519-526.LING Jiangming, LIU Shifu, YUAN Jie, et al. Comprehensive Analysis of Pavement Roughness Evaluation for Airport and Road with Different Roughness Excitation [J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 2017,45(04):519-526.
    [5]International Civil Aviation Organization, International Standards and Recommended Practices, Aerodromes, Annex 14 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, July, 1990.
    [6]Federal Aviation Administration, Advisory Circular 150/5370-10B, Standards for Specifying Construction of Airport Pavements, Washington, D.C., April 25, 2005.
    [7]凌建明,刘诗福,袁捷,等. 采用IRI评价机场道面平整度的适用性[J]. 交通运输工程学报,2017,17(01):20-27LING Jianming, Liu Shifu, Yuan Jie, et al. Applicability of IRI based evaluation of airport pavement roughness [J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. 2017, (17) 20-27.
    [8]CHEN Y, CHOU C. Effects of airport pavement-profile wavelength on aircraft vertical responses [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2004 (1889): 83-93.
    [9]LOPRENCIPE G, ZOCCALI P. Comparison of methods for evaluating airport pavement roughness [J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2017: 1-10.
    [10]刘诗福,凌建明,袁捷,杨文臣. 基于竖向加速度响应的机场道面平整度评价及IRI标准反演[J]. 公路交通科技,2017,34(05):57-64.LIU Shifu, LING Jianming, YUAN Jie, et al. Evaluation and IRI Criteria Inversion of Airport Pavement Roughness Based on Vertical Acceleration Response [J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 34(05):57-64.
    [11]周晓青.机场道面平整度评价指标研究[D].上海:同济大学,2006.ZHOU Xiaoqing. Study on airport pavement roughness evaluation [D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2006.
    [12]DeBord, K.J.. Runway roughness measurement, quantification and application – the Boeing method. Boeing Document No. D6-81746.Seattle: Boeing. 1995.
    [13]Federal Aviation Administration. Guidelines and procedures for measuring airfield pavement roughness. Advisory Circular No. 150/5380-9, U.S. Department of Transportation. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration. 2009
    [14]EMERY, S., HEFER, A., and HORAK, E. Roughness of runways and significance of appropriate specifications and measurement. 11th Conference on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa, 16–19 August.South Africa: Sun City. 2015
    [15]Federal Aviation Administration. Surface Roughness Final Study Data Collection Report Airbus A330-200[R]. 2016.
    [16]SIVAKUMAR S, HARAN A P. Mathematical model and vibration analysis of aircraft with active landing gears [J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2015, 21(2): 229.
    [17]FILARSKI J D. Runway Roughness Criteria[M]//Advancing Airfield Pavements. 2001: 171-180.
    [18]BS ISO2631-1:1997, 机械振动和冲击.人体暴露于全身振动的评价.一般要求[S].BS ISO2631-1:1997, Mechanical Vibration and Shock. Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-body Vibration. General Requirements[S].
    [19]Federal Aviation Administration. Surface Roughness Final Study Data Collection Report[R]. 2014.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

凌建明,刘诗福,李萌,袁捷.波音平整度评价方法的局限性分析[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2018,46(08):1035~1041

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1722
  • 下载次数: 969
  • HTML阅读次数: 788
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-23
  • 最后修改日期:2018-05-24
  • 录用日期:2018-04-18
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-09-05
文章二维码