基于Nested Logit的电动汽车分时租赁选择行为分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

同济大学 道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室,同济大学 汽车学院,同济大学 汽车学院

中图分类号:

U491

基金项目:

中央高校基本科研业务经费专项资金项目(kx0170020172681);上海市科技发展基金软科学研究重点项目(18692109400);同济大学智库研究专项(22120180208)


Analysis of Choices of Electric Car Sharing Based on Nested Logit Model
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [20]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于用户出行选择调查问卷的样本数据,应用Nested Logit离散选择模型进行回归分析,探究影响用户出行选择的因素,并计算出各种出行方式的分担率及其敏感度。结果表明:使用成本、站点距离、出行里程、驾龄、用户拥有私家车情况以及年龄等因素对用户是否选择电动汽车分时租赁有显著影响;当前电动汽车分时租赁在出行领域的显示性编好(revealed preference,RP)调查分担率为2.36%,使用成本对其敏感度为8.6%,站点距离对其敏感度为43.7%;陈术性编好(stated preference,SP)调查分担率为3.30%,使用成本对其敏感度为8.9%,站点距离对其敏感度为21.1%。

    Abstract:

    The Nested Logit Model was used to analyze the questionnaire investigation based on users’ travel modes choices. The factors influencing on users’ travel modes choices were researched. Users’ selection probability and sensitivity of travel modes were computed. The results show that cost, station distance, trip distance, driving-age, ownership of private cars and users’ age make a difference on selection probability of electric car sharing. Selection probability of electric car sharing based on RP(revealed preference) data is 2.36% while based on SP(stated preference) data is 3.30%. If cost of electric car sharing increase 1 yuan/kilometer, based on RP data selection probability of electric car sharing will decrease by 8.6% while based on SP data decrease by 8.9%. If station distance of electric car sharing increase 1 kilometer, based on RP data selection probability of electric car sharing will decrease by 43.7% while based on SP data decrease by 21.1%.

    参考文献
    [1] Martin E, Shaheen S. The impact of carsharing on household vehicle ownership[J]. University of California Transportation Center Working Papers, 2011, 38(38).
    [2] Michael Glotz-Richter. Car-Sharing – “Car-on-call” for reclaiming street space[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 48:1454-1463.
    [3] Costain C, Ardron C, Habib K N. Synopsis of users'' behaviour of a carsharing program: A case study in Toronto[C]// Meeting of Transportation Research Board. 2012.
    [4] Crane K, Ecola L, Hassell S, et al. Energy Services Analysis:An Alternative Approach for Identifying Opportunities to Reduce Emissions of Greenhouse Gases[M]. RAND Corporation, 2012.
    [5] Luca S D, Pace R D. Modelling users’ behaviour in inter-urban carsharing program: A stated pReference approach[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2015, 71(C):59-76.
    [6] Baptista P, Melo S, Rolim C. Energy, Environmental and Mobility Impacts of Car-sharing Systems. Empirical Results from Lisbon, Portugal ☆[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 111(3):28-37.
    [7] Stasko T H, Buck A B, Gao H O. Carsharing in a university setting: Impacts on vehicle ownership, parking demand, and mobility in Ithaca, NY[J]. Transport Policy, 2013, 30(4):262-268.
    [8] Sierzchula W, Bakker S, Maat K, et al. The competitive environment of electric vehicles: An analysis of prototype and production models[J]. Environmental Innovation Societal Transitions, 2012, 2(2):49-65.
    [9] Brady, John, O’Mahony, et al. Travel to work in Dublin. The potential impacts of electric vehicles on climate change and urban air quality[J]. Transportation Research Part D Transport Environment, 2011, 16(2):188-193.
    [10] Hawkins T R, Singh B, Majeau-Bettez G, et al. Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2013, 17(1):53-64.
    [11] Hanschke C B. Duurzame innovatie in het wegverkeer[J]. 2009.
    [12] Meijkamp R. Changing consumer behaviour through eco-efficient services: an empirical study of car sharing in the Netherlands[J]. Business Strategy the Environment, 2001, 7(4):234-244.
    [13] Shaheen S A, Barth M. THE POTENTIAL FOR SHARED-USE VEHICLE SYSTEMS IN CHINA[J]. Davis, 2003.
    [14] Seik F T. Vehicle ownership restraints and car sharing in Singapore[J]. Habitat International, 2000, 24(1):75-90.
    [15] Barth M, Todd M. Simulation model performance analysis of a multiple station shared vehicle system[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 1999, 7(4): 237-259.
    [16] Brook David. Carsharing–start up issues and new operational models[C]//Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. 2004.
    [17] Luè A, Colorni A, Nocerino R, et al. Green Move: An Innovative Electric Vehicle-Sharing System[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 48:2978-2987.
    [18] Shaheen S A, Cano L A, Camel M L. Electric Vehicle Carsharing in a Senior Adult Community in San Francisco Bay Area[C]//Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting. 2013 (13-4491).
    [19] Kim D, Ko J, Park Y. Factors affecting electric vehicle sharing program participants’ attitudes about car ownership and program participation[J]. Transportation Research Part D, 2015, 36:96-106.
    [20] 黄肇义,杨东援.国外小汽车共用的发展状况[J].城市规划汇刊,2000,6(50): 2.HUANG Zhaoyi, YANG Dongyuan. Development of abroad car sharing[J]. Journal of City Planning, 2000, 6(20):2.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

刘向,董德存,王宁,张文剑.基于Nested Logit的电动汽车分时租赁选择行为分析[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(01):0047~0055

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1592
  • 下载次数: 1062
  • HTML阅读次数: 723
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-26
  • 最后修改日期:2018-11-06
  • 录用日期:2018-08-15
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-01-25
文章二维码