基于非合作模型预测控制的人机共驾策略
CSTR:
作者:
中图分类号:

U461.6

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划(2016YFB0100904-2)


Cooperative Driving Strategy Based on Non-cooperative Model Predictive Control
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [18]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    提出一种基于非合作模型预测控制(model predictive control, MPC)的智能汽车人机共驾策略.首先,建立了驾驶员和控制系统两者共同控制车辆的人机共驾系统模型.接着,得到了驾驶员和控制系统的代价函数.然后,求解了非合作MPC人机共驾策略的纳什均衡解.最后,通过仿真验证了非合作MPC人机共驾策略的优点和有效性.证明了非合作MPC的纳什均衡解可以通过非迭代的方法求解,并通过驾驶员和控制系统置信度矩阵的更新实现了驾驶权的逐渐交接.Matlab仿真表明,非合作MPC人机共驾策略可以在智能车辆遇到危险时将驾驶权逐渐从驾驶员转交给控制系统,同时保证驾驶员实时在环.

    Abstract:

    An intelligent vehicle cooperative driving strategy based on non-cooperative model predictive control (MPC) was proposed. Firstly, the cooperative driving model was presented, in which the shared control of the vehicle was realized. Next, the cost functions of the driver and the control system were obtained. Then, the Nash equilibrium solution of the non-cooperative MPC was achieved. At last, simulations were used to verify the advantages and effectiveness of the strategy. It is shown that the Nash equilibrium solution of the non-cooperative MPC can be achieved by a non-iterative method. And gradual handover of the driving privilege is realized by using the updated confidence matrixes of the driver and the control system. Simulations based on Matlab show that the noncooperative MPC cooperative driving strategy can deliver the driving privilege from the driver to the control system gradually when the intelligent vehicle encounters danger. And this strategy can guarantee that the driver is in the control loop all the time.

    参考文献
    [1] Michon J A. A Critical View of Driver Behavior Models: What Do We Know, What Should We Do?[J], Human Behavior and Traffic Safety, 1985.
    [2] Rumar K. The role of perceptual and cognitive filters in ohserved hehavior[M]. Evans L, Schwing R C. Human Behavior and Traffic Safety. New York: Springer, 1985: 151-170.
    [3] Khosravani S, Khajepour A, Fidan B, et al. Development of a Robust Vehicle Control with Driver in the Loop[C]//American Control Conference. Portland: IEEE, 2014: 3482-3487.
    [4] Li R, Li S, Gao H, et al. Effects of Human Adaptation and Trust on Shared Control for Driver-Automation Cooperative Driving[C]//SAE Technical Paper Series. Detroit: SAE Publication Group, 2017: 2017-01-1987.
    [5] Abbink D A, Mulder M, Boer E R. Haptic shared control: smoothly shifting control authority?[J]. Cognition Technology Work, 2012, 14(1): 19-28.
    [6] Soualmi B, Sentouh C, Popieul J C, et al. Automation-driver cooperative driving in presence of undetected obstacles[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2014, 24(1): 106-119.
    [7] Mulder M, Abbink D A, Boer E R. Sharing Control With Haptics: Seamless Driver Support From Manual to Automatic Control[J]. Human Factors, 2012, 54(5): 786-798.
    [8] Omae M, Fujioka T, Hashimoto N, et al. The Application of RTK-GPS and Steer-by-Wire Technology to the Automatic Driving of Vehicles and an Evaluation of Driver Behavior[J]. IATSS Research, 2006, 30(2): 29-38.
    [9] Li R, Li Y, Li S E, et al. Driver-Automation Indirect Shared Control of Highly Automated Vehicles with Intention-Aware Authority Transition[C]//Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. Los Angeles: IEEE, 2017: 26-32.
    [10] Basar T, Olsder G J. Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory[M]. Philadelphia: SIAM, 1999.
    [11] Ma W H, Peng H. Worst-Case Vehicle Evaluation Methodology? Examples on Truck Rollover/Jackknifing and Active Yaw Control Systems[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 1999, 32(4-5): 389-408.
    [12] Ma W H, Peng H. A worst-case evaluation method for dynamic systems[J]. Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-Transactions of the Asme, 1999, 121(2): 191-199.
    [13] Tamaddoni S H, Taheri S, Ahmadian M. Optimal VSC Design Based On Nash Strategy for Differential 2-Player Games[C]//International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. San Antonio: IEEE, 2009: 2415-2420.
    [14] Tamaddoni S H, Taheri S, Ahmadian M. Optimal preview game theory approach to vehicle stability controller design[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2011, 49(12): 1967-1979.
    [15] Na X, Cole D J. Linear quadratic game and non-cooperative predictive methods for potential application to modelling driver-AFS interactive steering control[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2013, 51(2): 165-198.
    [16] Engwerda J. LQ Dynamic Optimization and Differential Games[M]. London: John Wiley Sons Ltd, 2005.
    [17] Maciejowski J M. Predictive control with constraints[M]. Pearson Education, 2001.
    [18] Sledge N H, Marshek K M. Comparison of Ideal Vehicle Lane-Change Trajectories[C]//SAE Technical Paper Series. Detroit: SAE Publication Group, 1997: 971062.
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘瑞,朱西产,刘霖,马志雄.基于非合作模型预测控制的人机共驾策略[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(07):1037~1045

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:2210
  • 下载次数: 1127
  • HTML阅读次数: 1625
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-06
  • 最后修改日期:2019-04-30
  • 录用日期:2019-03-04
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-07-29
文章二维码