不同压缩比下稀释方式对直喷汽油机节油影响
CSTR:
作者:
中图分类号:

TK417

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(51761135105),同济大学KSPG教席基金


Effects of different dilution methods on Fuel Consumption for Gasoline Direct Injection Engine under Different Compression Ratio
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [15]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于一台1.0 L涡轮增压发动机,在9.6及12的压缩比下,研究了化学当量比、稀薄燃烧(稀燃)及低压废气再循环(EGR)工况下的燃烧与油耗特性.结果表明:EGR在压缩比12、大负荷工况下,节油效果优于稀燃,其余工况下稀燃的节油效果均更好.通过改变压缩比并结合稀燃或EGR,小、中、大负荷下燃油消耗率(BSFC)相比于压缩比9.6化学当量比工况降低最多为7.5%、10.4%和9.3%.结合一维仿真,分析并对比了大负荷下稀燃与EGR的节油原因及其差异.结果表明:在压缩比12、大负荷、过量空气系数(λ)小于1.4的情况下稀燃不能抑制爆震,节油效果不明显;相同工况下EGR可以有效抑制爆震,降低燃油消耗率达5.5%;大负荷下稀燃和EGR的节油来源主要为传热损失和排气损失减少,二者对节油的贡献程度之和大于90%.

    Abstract:

    Based on a 1.0 L turbocharged engine, stoichiometric, lean burn and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) conditions were tested under the compression ratios (CR) of 9.6 and 12 to study their combustion and fuel consumption characteristics. The results show that the fuelsaving effect of EGR is better than that of lean combustion under heavy loads with higher compression ratio, and the fuelsaving effect of lean combustion is better under other conditions. By changing CR together with lean burn or EGR, brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) can be reduced by at most 7.5%, 10.4% and 9.3% comparing with CR9.6 stoichiometric conditions under light, medium and heavy loads respectively. Combined with onedimensional simulation, the reasons and different characteristics of fuel saving under lean burn and EGR conditions under heavy loads are analyzed and compared. The results show that lean burn under high compression ratio and heavy load when excess air ratio (λ)<1.4 cannot suppress knocking, and the fuel saving effect is not obvious; under the same working condition EGR can effectively suppress knocking and reduce fuel consumption up to 5.5%. The fuelsaving of lean burn and EGR under heavy loads are mainly due to the reduction of heat transfer loss and exhaust loss. The sum of their contribution to fuel economy is higher than 90%.

    参考文献
    [1]DIANA S,GIGLIO V,IORIO B,et al. A strategy to improve the efficiency of stoichiometric spark ignition engines[C]// SAE. Detroit: SAE, 1996: 961953.
    [2]冯洪庆. 汽油机稀薄燃烧及 NOx 排放催化控制研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2003.FENG Hongqing. Study on Lean Combustion of 465 Gasoline Engine and Its NOx Emission Catalytic Control[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2003.
    [3]李志军, 刘书亮, 毕风荣,等. 用吸附还原与三元催化器组合降低富氧汽油机NOx的排放[J]. 天津大学学报:自然科学与工程技术版, 2004, 37(9):765~768.LI Zhijun, LIU Shuliang, BI Fengrong, et al. Reduction of NO<sub>x</sub> Emission in Lean Burn Gasoline Engine Under Different Combination Schemes of NO<sub>x</sub> Absorber and Three Way Catalysts[J]. Journal of Tianjin University, 2004, 37(9):765-768.
    [4]李明. 直喷汽油机稀薄燃烧与氮氧化物排放控制研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2009.Li Ming. Study on Lean Combustion and NOx Emission Control on GDI Engine[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2009.
    [5]PAULY T, FRANOSCHEK S, HOYER R, et al. Cost and fuel economy driven aftertreatment solutions-for lean GDI[C]. SAE. Detroit: SAE, 2010: 2010-01-0363.
    [6]LUMSDEN, G, EDDLESTON, D, SYKES, R. Comparing Lean Burn and EGR[C]. SAE. Detroit: SAE, 1997: 970505.
    [7]TANG Q, LIU J, ZHAN Z, et al. Influences on combustion characteristics and performances of EGR vs. lean burn in a gasoline engine[C]. SAE. Detroit: SAE, 2013: 2013-01-1125
    [8]Amr Ibrahim,Saiful Bari. A comparison between EGR and lean-burn strategies employed in a natural gas SI engine using a two-zone combustion model[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2009, 50(12): 3129~3139.
    [9]GRANDIN B, ANGSTROM H E. Replacing fuel enrichment in a turbo charged SI engine: lean burn or cooled EGR[C]. SAE. Toronto: SAE, 1999: 1999-01-3505.
    [10]TOPINKA J A, M.D. GERTY, HEYWOOD J B, et al. Knock Behavior of a Lean-Burn, H2 and CO Enhanced, SI Gasoline Engine Concept[C]. SAE. Detroit: SAE, 2004: 2004-01-0975.
    [11]于吉超, 刘德新, 冯洪庆. 稀薄燃烧汽油机爆震特性[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2007, 13(1):72-75.YU Jichao, LIU Dexin, FENG Hongqing. Knock Property of Lean-Burn Gasoline Engine[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2007, 13(1):72~75.
    [12]WOSCHNI G. A Universally Applicable Equation for the Instantaneous Heat Transfer Coefficient in the Internal Combustion Engine[C]. SAE. Detroit: SAE, 1967: 670931.
    [13]杜丹阳. 不同压缩比下活塞顶部形状对汽油机燃烧特性的影响研究[D]. 秦皇岛:燕山大学, 2016.DU Danyang. Study on the Influence of Piston Shape on Combustion of Different Compression Ratio Engine[D]. Qinhuangdao: Yanshan University, 2016.
    [14]苏建业, 许敏, 高弈,等. 考虑外部冷却EGR的增压直喷汽油机爆震发生时刻预测模型[J]. 内燃机学报, 2014(5):443-447.SU Jianye, XU Min, GAO Yi, et al. Knock Onset Prediction Model with Consideration of External Cooled EGR in a Boosted Spark-Ignition Direct-Injection Engine[J]. Transactions of CSICE, 2014(5): 443-447.
    [15]EINEWALL P, TUNESTAL P, JOHANSSON B. Lean Burn Natural Gas Operation vs. Stoichiometric Operation with EGR and a Three Way Catalyst[C]. SAE. Detroit: SAE, 2005, 2005-01-0250.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

王金秋,晁岳栋,朱登豪,邓俊,李理光.不同压缩比下稀释方式对直喷汽油机节油影响[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(12):1801~1808

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:709
  • 下载次数: 753
  • HTML阅读次数: 1150
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-28
  • 最后修改日期:2019-10-14
  • 录用日期:2019-09-17
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-01-02
文章二维码