阻塞比对开口式风洞喷口风速测量方法的影响
CSTR:
作者:
中图分类号:

U467.1

基金项目:

上海市专业技术服务平台项目(19DZ2290400)


Influence of Blockage Ratio on Nozzle Wind Speed Measurement Method in Open-Jet Wind Tunnel
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [11]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以1∶15的3/4开口回流式模型风洞为研究对象,通过放置不同比例大小的Ahmed body模型,采用试验和数值计算相结合的方法,研究阻塞比对于喷口法和驻室法这两种喷口风速测量方法的影响.结果表明:不同的阻塞比工况下,虽然驻室法测量误差稍大于喷口法测量误差,但驻室法对于修正系数的敏感度明显低于喷口法,即驻室法可使用更少的修正系数修正更多的工况,更易进行修正.

    Abstract:

    In this paper, the 3/4 open-jet closed circuit model wind tunnel with a ratio of 1∶15 was taken as the research object. By placing the Ahmed body model with different proportions, the combination of experiment and numerical simulation was conducted to study the influence of blockage ratio on nozzle wind speed measurement by using the nozzle method and the plenum method. The results indicated that, for different blockage ratios, the measurement error of the plenum method was slightly larger than that of the nozzle method, but the sensitivity of the plenum method to the correction coefficient was significantly lower than that of the nozzle method i.e., more working conditions could be corrected with fewer correction coefficient for plenum method, which meant that the plenum method was easier to be corrected.

    参考文献
    [1] Fenton J. Advances in Vehicle Design[M]. 1999.
    [2] Kuenstner R, Deutenbach K R, Vagt J D. Measurement of Reference Dynamic Pressure in Open-Jet Automotive Wind Tunnels[R]. SAETechnical Paper, 1992.
    [3] Cogotti A, Buchheim R, Garrone A, et al. Comparison Tests Between Some Full-Scale European Automotive Wind Tunnels-Pininfarina Reference Car[R]. SAETechnical Paper,1980.
    [4] Wickern G, Schwartekopp B. Correction of Nozzle Gradient Effects in Open Jet Wind Tunnels[C]. SAE Technical Paper, 2004-01-0669.
    [5] Yang Z, Schenkel M, Fadler G J. Corrections of the Pressure Gradient Effects on Vehicle Aerodynamic Drag[R]. SAETechnical Paper, 2003-01-0935.
    [6] Yang Z, Schenkel M. Assessment of Closed-Wall Wind Tunnel Blockage Using CFD[C]. SAE Technical Paper, 2004-01-0672.
    [7] Yang Z, Nastov A, Schenkel M. Further Assessment of Closed-Wall Wind Tunnel Blockage Using CFD[R]. SAETechnical Paper, 2005-01-0868.
    [8] 庞加斌, 刘晓晖, 陈力,王志国. 汽车风洞试验中的雷诺数、阻塞和边界层效应问题综述[J]. 汽车工程, 2009, 31(7):609~615.PANG Jiabin, LIU Xiaohui, CHEN Li, WANG Zhiguo. A review on Reynolds number blockage and boundary layer effects in automotive wind tunnel tests[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2009, 31(7):609~615.
    [9] 贾青,杨志刚.不同收集口角度下模型风洞试验段流场的数值模拟与试验研究[J].试验流体力学, 2007, 12(1):93-96.JIA Qing, YANG Zhigang. Simulation and test research for a model wind tunnel test section at different collector angles[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 12(1):93-96.
    [10] 郭鸿志.传输过程数值模拟[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,1998.GUO Hongzhi. Numerical simulation of transmission process[M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 1998.
    [11] 约翰D·安德森.计算流体力学基础及其应用[M].北京:机械工业出版社, 2007.John D. Anderson. Computational Fluid Dynamics[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2007.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

贾青,黄磊,鞠树彬,杨志刚.阻塞比对开口式风洞喷口风速测量方法的影响[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(11):1641~1647

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:806
  • 下载次数: 1106
  • HTML阅读次数: 1343
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-15
  • 最后修改日期:2019-08-21
  • 录用日期:2019-08-02
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-12-05
文章二维码