基于浮动单元的职住平衡尺度分析方法
CSTR:
作者:
中图分类号:

U491.1+2

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(71734004)


Analysis Method of Jobs-housing Balance Scale Based on Floating Unit
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [17]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以职住比作为测度指标,基于地理信息系统(GIS)软件生成的浮动单元进行空间范围平衡度分析,进而通过累积统计指标变化曲线和数值分布的可视化,得到超大城市的就业中心、居住区和一般建设区的职住平衡空间尺度.采用上海岗位、人口、路网等基础数据,以80%、85%、95%等不同收敛值的路网距离阈值筛选结果,研究表明,就业中心的职住平衡空间尺度最大,按85%的收敛值,其浦西部分为15~25 km,浦东部分为20~28 km;就业次中心为4~10 km.其他区域的平衡尺度由就业中心决定,随着与中心的距离增大而扩大、由3 km向外扩展到8~17 km,邻近就业次中心的区域平衡尺度因叠加效应而缩小.该方法亦能用于职住空间结构和就业、居住可达性等分析,通过与岗位、居民通勤距离进行对比,有助于解释职住空间错位与长距离通勤交通现象的关联和内在原因.

    Abstract:

    Based on the calculation of the ratios of employment to population within floating units generated by the software of geographic information system(GIS), the spatial scale and degree of balance are analyzed. With the visualization of change curve and numerical distributions of the cumulative statistical indicators, spatial scales of jobs-housing balance for the employment center and sub-centers, residential communities and other areas in a mega city are obtained. Based on the data of jobs, population, road network in Shanghai, in case of different convergence values, such as 80%, 85% and 95%, the employment center has the largest scale of jobs-housing balance. By 85%, it is about 15 to 25 km for Puxi area, while Pudong area varies from 20 to 28 km. For employment sub-centers, the scales are 4 to 10 km. The balance scales of other zones are determined by the employment center as well as sub-centers. As the distance from the centers increases, it is expanded from 3 km to 8 km, even 17 km. This method could be used to analyze the urban spatial structure and jobs or housing accessibility. By employment and residential commuting distance analysis, it is expected to explain the phenomena and internal causes of jobs-housing mismatch and long-distance commuting.

    参考文献
    [1]上海市第五次综合交通调查联席会议办公室,上海市城乡建设和交通发展研究院. 上海市第五次综合交通调查总报告[R]. 上海市交通委员会, 2015.#$NLOffice of the Leading Group for the Fifth Comprehensive Transportation Survey of Shanghai. Shanghai Research Institute of Construction and Transportation Development. The fifth comprehensive transportation survey report of Shanghai[R]. Shanghai: Shanghai Municipal Transportation Commission, 2015.
    [2]Zhou X, Chen X, Zhang T. Impact of megacity jobs-housing spatial mismatch on commuting behaviors: a case study on central districts of Shanghai, China [J]. Sustainability, 2016, 8: 122.
    [3]Levingston B L. Using jobs/housing balance indicators for air pollution control[R]. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Transportation Studies, 1989.
    [4]Deakin E. Land use and transportation planning in response to congestion problems: a review and critique[J] Transportation Research Record, 1989: 77–86.
    [5]Peng Z R. The jobs-housing balance and urban commuting. Urban Studies, 1997, 34: 1215–1235.
    [6]Cervero R, Duncan M. Which reduces vehicle travel more: jobs-housing balance or retail- housing mixing [J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2006,72(4): 475-490.
    [7]周翔. 基于职住平衡测度与通勤强度的交通政策分区研究[D].上海:同济大学交通运输工程学院, 2017.#$NLZHOU Xiang. Study on Transport Policy Zoning Based on Jobs-housing Balance Measure and Commuting Intensity[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, College of Transportation Engineering, 2017.
    [8]Openshaw S. The modifiable areal unit problem, concepts and techniques in modern geography[M]. Norwich: Geobooks, 1984.
    [9]陈江平, 张瑶, 余远剑. 空间自相关的可塑性面积单元问题效应[J].地理学报,2011,66(12): 1597-1606.#$NLCHEN Jiangping, ZHANG Yao, YU Yuanjian. Effect of MAUP in Spatial Autocorrelation[J]. Acta Geographic Sinica, 2011,66(12): 1597-1606.
    [10]Cervero R. Jobs-housing balance and regional mobility[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1989, 55(2): 136- 150.
    [11]Zhou X, Chen X, Zhang T. Spatial Scale Analysis and Layout Optimization of Commuting Circle Based on One-hour’s Law: A Case Study of Shanghai Metropolis [C]. CICTP2017 Transportation Reform and Change-Equity, Inclusiveness, Sharing and Innovation. Proceedings of the 17th Cota International Conference of Transportation Professionals,2018:3943-52.
    [12]于涛方, 吴唯佳. 单中心还是多中心: 北京城市就业次中心研究[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2016, 229(3): 21-29.#$NLYU Taofang, WU Weijia. Monocentric or polycentric? a study on urban employment sub-centers in Beijing[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2016, 229(3): 21-29.
    [13]王德, 赵锦华. 城镇势力圈划分计算机系统的开发研究与应用——兼论势力圈的空间结构特征[J]. 城市规划, 2000, 24(12): 37-41.#$NLWANG De, ZHAO Jinhua. A computer assisted hinterland division system: its development and application[J]. City Planning Review, 2000, 24(12): 37-41.
    [14]Alonso W. Location and land use [M]. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. 1964.
    [15]Mills E S. An aggregate model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area[J]. American Economic Review,1967,57: 197-210.
    [16]Muth R F. Cities and housing [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1969.
    [17]Henderson J V. Economic theory and the cities[M]. New York: Academic Press. 1985.
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈小鸿,周翔.基于浮动单元的职住平衡尺度分析方法[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(12):1727~1734

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1011
  • 下载次数: 1115
  • HTML阅读次数: 1483
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-21
  • 最后修改日期:2019-10-20
  • 录用日期:2019-09-03
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-01-02
文章二维码