基于眼动指标的公路隧道洞口景观设计舒适性及 安全性评价
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

长安大学 公路学院,陕西 西安 710064

作者简介:

叶 飞(1977—),男,教授,博士生导师,工学博士,主要研究方向为隧道及地下工程。 E-mail:xianyefei@126.com

中图分类号:

U453.1

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(52078046,51878060)


Comfort and Safety Evaluation of Tunnel Portal Landscape Design Based on Eye Movement Index
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于云南省板仑隧道洞口景观设计方案,选取洞门线型、洞门颜色、洞口绿化及洞门肌理4个主要影响因素,采用正交试验设计方法,建立9种模型方案。利用自主研发的驾驶模拟试验系统及眼动仪设备开展驾驶模拟试验,选取瞳孔直径和视线偏离时间作为评价指标。结果表明:4个因素对行车舒适性及安全性的影响排序为洞门肌理>洞口绿化>洞门颜色>洞门线型;模型5(绿色端墙、壁画装饰、城墙式、洞口一般绿化)和模型9(灰色端墙、壁画装饰、曲线型、洞口精致绿化)的景观设计方案出现了驾驶分心现象,存在驾驶安全隐患。基于试验结果,从美学角度对隧道洞口景观设计提出了优化建议。

    Abstract:

    Based on the portal landscape design scheme of Ban-lun Tunnel in Yunnan Province, we selected four primary influencing factors including portal linetype, portal color, portal greening, and portal texture. An orthogonal experimental design was adopted, and nine model schemes were established. A driving simulation test was conducted using a driving simulation test system and eye tracker, meanwhile, the pupil diameter and the sight deviation time were selected as evaluation indexes. The results show that in terms of portal landscape driving comfort, the order of importance of the four factors is as follows: portal texture, portal greening, portal color, and portal linetype. The distractions of drivers appear in the fifth model (green end wall, mural, city wall type, and natural greening), and the ninth model (grey end wall, mural, arc line type, elaborate greening), leading to the potential safety hazard of driving. Based on the experimental results, some optimization suggestions were put forward for the tunnel portal landscape design from the aesthetic aspect.

    表 1 各因子及水平列表Table 1
    表 2 正交试验设计方案Table 2
    表 3 驾驶人平均瞳孔直径Table 3
    图1 板仑隧道洞门景观设计(单位:cm)Fig.1 Portal landscape design of Ban-lun Tunnel (unit: cm)
    图2 9种模型方案效果Fig.2 Renderings of nine model schemes
    图3 驾驶模拟系统Fig.3 Driving simulation system
    图4 眼动仪Fig.4 Eye tracker
    图5 试验者熟悉训练Fig.5 Familiarity training of participants
    图6 试验者标定过程Fig.6 Calibration process of participants
    图7 试验过程Fig.7 Test process
    图8 部分驾驶人瞳孔直径变化曲线Fig.8 Curve of pupil diameter for several participants
    图9 各因子3个水平下瞳孔直径极差分析Fig.9 Analysis of pupil diameter range at three levels of each factor
    图10 眼动仪数据分析过程Fig.10 Analytical process of data from eye tracker
    图11 9种方案试验者视线偏移道路统计(单位:s)Fig.11 Summary of line deviation of participants’ sight for nine models(unit: s)
    图12 方案5试验者视线偏移道路Fig.12 Line deviation of participants’ sight for scheme 5
    图13 方案9试验者视线偏移道路Fig.13 Line deviation of participants’sight for scheme 9
    图14 板仑隧道Fig.14 Ban-lun Tunnel
    表 4 9种方案景观安全性评价结果Table 4
    参考文献
引用本文

叶飞,应凯臣,苏恩杰,魏艳春,梁晓明.基于眼动指标的公路隧道洞口景观设计舒适性及 安全性评价[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2021,49(2):218~226

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-30
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-03-18
文章二维码