基于驾乘人员热感觉的车内空调送风参数设计
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.同济大学 机械与能源工程学院,上海 201804;2.同济大学 上海市地面交通工具空气动力与热环境模拟重点实验室,上海 201804

作者简介:

赵兰萍(1967—),女,副教授,工学博士,主要研究方向为汽车空调及整车热管理。 E-mail: lanpignzhao@tongji.edu.cn

中图分类号:

TK11

基金项目:

上海市地面交通工具空气动力与热环境重点实验室科研计划(19DZ2290400)


Design of Air Supply Parameters in Vehicle Cabin Based on Human Thermal Sensation
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Mechanical Engineering,Tongji University,Shanghai 201804,China;2.Shanghai Key Laboratory of Vehicle Aerodynamics and Vehicle Thermal Management Systems,Tongji University,Shanghai 201804,China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [23]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    由于车内热环境的高度不均匀性,适用于均匀热环境的平均热感觉(PMV)评价方法无法对乘员热舒适状态做出客观评估。等效均匀温度(EHT)评价方法则考虑了不均匀热环境对人体的影响。通过建立计算流体力学(CFD)与人体热调节模型的耦合模型,采用最优拉丁超立方设计法,建立乘员舱空调送风参数和太阳参数与EHT和PMV等参数之间关系的近似模型。基于两种评价方法,通过序列二次规划优化算法(NLPQL),对不同热舒适需求下的送风参数进行设计。对比两种评价方法所设计的送风参数下,人体平均皮肤温度、人体与车内热环境的潜热/显热交换量等参数的区别。发现同一热舒适需求下,相较于PMV评价方法,基于EHT评价方法设计出的送风状态更偏向高风温及高风速。

    Abstract:

    Due to the highly non-uniform characteristics of the thermal environment of vehicle cabins, the predicted mean vote (PMV-PPD) evaluation method developed from uniform thermal environment cannot objectively evaluate the thermal comfort state of passengers. The evaluation method based on equivalent uniform temperature (EHT) takes into account the response of human body to the heterogeneous thermal environment. In this paper, a coupled simulation model of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and human thermal physiological model was built, and several approximate models such as EHT and PMV of the passenger compartment with air supply parameters as well as solar parameters were fitted by using the optimal Latin hypercube design method. Then, based on the EHT and PMV evaluation methods, the cabin air supply parameters under different thermal comfort requirements were designed by using the sequential quadratic programming optimization algorithm (NLPQL). The average skin temperature of human body, the latent / sensible heat transfer rate between human body and the cabin, and the ratio of convective to radiation under the two evaluation methods were compared. It was found that under the same thermal comfort demand, compared with the PMV evaluation method, the air supply state designed based on the EHT method is more inclined to high air temperature as well as a high air-supply velocity.

    参考文献
    [1] 倪冬香. 基于人体热调节模型的轿车乘员舱热舒适性分析[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2010.
    [2] LAJUNEN A. Energy efficiency and performance of cabin thermal management in electric vehicles[C]// SAE Technical Paper. Chicago: Society of Automotive Engineers,2017,1:192-202.
    [3] DEHNE T, LANGE P, VOLKMANN A, et al. Vertical ventilation concepts for future passenger cars[J]. Building and Environment, 2017, 129:142.
    [4] WU Jianghong, JIANG Feng. Analysis and validation of transient thermal model for automobile cabin[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering: Design, Processes, Equipment, Economics, 2017, 122:91.
    [5] 国家机械工业局. 汽车空调整车降温性能试验方法: QC/T 658—2000[S].北京:中华计划出版社,2000.
    [6] FANGER P O. Thermal comfort [M]. New York:McGraw-Hill, 1970.
    [7] HAN T, HUANG L. A model for relating a thermal comfort scale to EHT comfort index[J]. SAE Paper, 2004,1:919.
    [8] ZHANG H, DAI L, XU G, et al. Studies of air-flow and temperature fields inside a passenger compartment for improving thermal comfort and saving energy part II: simulation results and discussion[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2009, 29(10): 2028.
    [9] 谢方. 基于真人测试的车内人体热舒适性实验研究[D]. 广州:华南理工大学, 2013.
    [10] MAO Y, WANG J, LI J. Experimental and numerical study of air flow and temperature variations in an electric vehicle cabin during cooling and heating[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 137:356.
    [11] 张文灿. 汽车乘坐空间热环境与乘员热舒适性分析关键技术研究[D]. 广州:华南理工大学, 2013
    [12] STOLWIJK J A J. Temperature regulation in man — a theoretical study[J]. Pflugers Arch, 1966, 291(2):129.
    [13] HAN T, HUANG L, KELLY S, et al. Virtual thermal comfort engineering[J]. SAE Paper, 2001,1:588.
    [14] WYON D P. Use of thermal manikins in environmental ergonomics[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, 1989, 15:84.
    [15] 杨志刚, 林赵敏, 赵兰萍. 基于等效均匀温度的车内热环境分析[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(11):1633.
    [16] TANABE S, ZHANG H, ARENS E A, et al. Evaluating thermal environments by using a thermal manikin with controlled skin surface temperature[J]. ASHRAE Transactions, 1994, 100(1):39.
    [17] Swiss Standards Institution.Ergonomics of the thermal environment - evaluation of thermal environments in vehicles - part 2: determination of equivalent temperature:ISO 14505-2/AC—2009[S].Berne:Swiss Standards Institution,2013.
    [18] FODA E, KAI A. Thermal manikin with human thermoregulatory control: implementation and validation[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2012, 56(5):959.
    [19] NILSSON H O. Thermal comfort evaluation with virtual manikin methods[J]. Building and Environment, 2007, 42(12):4000.
    [20] FANGER P O. Thermal comfort[M]. Kopenhagen: Dannish Technical Press,1970.
    [21] British Standards Institution. Ergonomics of the thermal environment-analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria:BN ES ISO7730:2005[S]. London:British Standards Institution,2005.
    [22] NILSSON H O, HOMLER I. Comfort climate evaluation with thermal manikin methods and computer simulation models[J]. Indoor Air, 2003, 13(1):28.
    LI Wei, JIANG Shanhe. Establishment and prediction of haze formation model based on RBF neural network[J]. Journal of Anqing Normal University(Natural Science ), 2020,26(4):41.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

赵兰萍,郑振鹏,徐鑫,杨志刚.基于驾乘人员热感觉的车内空调送风参数设计[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2021,49(5):721~730

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:495
  • 下载次数: 1363
  • HTML阅读次数: 422
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-03
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-05-24
文章二维码