传统和网络数据包络分析对机场运营相对无效判定结果的荟萃分析

Traditional and Network DEA for Judgment of Relatively Ineffective Airports Based on Meta-analysis

摘要:

为了分析分别使用传统和网络数据包络分析（data envelopment analysis，DEA）判定机场运营是否相对无效时判定结果的差异，通过制定文献标准进行了有关DEA和机场运营效率的文献遴选和数据提取。基于荟萃分析方法，对所选研究进行了发表性偏倚分析，对提取的数据进行了异质性和显著性检验。结果表明，所选的研究和数据具有统计学意义，使用传统DEA方法得到的运营相对无效机场数与相对有效机场数之比为使用网络DEA方法的0.17倍，使用网络DEA进行机场运营是否相对无效的判定更为真实准确。

Abstract:

To analyze the difference between traditional and network data envelopment analysis （DEA） in judging whether the airport operation is relatively inefficient， this paper made literature selection and data extraction on DEA and airport operation efficiency by formulating literature standards. Publication bias of selected studies is conducted， and heterogeneity and overall effect of extracted data is tested based on meta-analysis. The results show that the selected research and data have statistical significance， and the ratio of the number of relatively ineffective airports to the number of relatively effective airports obtained by the traditional DEA method is 0.17 times that of the network DEA method. Using network DEA method to judge whether the airport operation is relatively inefficient is truer and more accurate than traditional DEA method.