公众参与下交通基础设施公私合作项目风险分担再谈判演化博弈
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.同济大学 经济与管理学院 上海 200092;2.上海交通大学 国际与公共事务学院,上海 200240

作者简介:

沈 炜(1982—),男,工学博士,主要研究方向为交通管理。E-mail: 1019083652@qq.com

通讯作者:

周林意(1985—),男,管理学博士,主要研究方向为环境管制、风险治理。 E-mail: zhoulinyi1017@163.com

中图分类号:

F512.7

基金项目:

国家社科基金重大项目(13&ZD176)


Evolutionary Game of Risk-sharing Renegotiation for Transportation Infrastructure PPP Projects Under Public Participation
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Economics and Management,Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;2.School of International and Public Affairs,Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [15]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    通过构建公众参与下交通基础设施公私合作(public-private partnership,PPP)项目风险分担再谈判演化博弈模型,分析如何规避企业再谈判过程中的机会主义行为。结果表明:当企业采取非机会主义行为策略所获得的收益小于采取机会主义行为策略所获得的收益时,公众参与能促使企业采取非机会主义行为策略;在公众参与概率较低的情况下,规避企业机会主义行为的一种重要方式是提高政府对企业机会主义行为的惩罚力度;不同的公众监督水平对政府处罚力度的要求不一样,在公众监督意愿较低的情况下需要政府加大对企业的惩罚力度才能迫使企业转变机会主义行为。

    Abstract:

    By constructing an evolutionary game model under public participation, how to avoid the opportunistic behavior in risk-sharing renegotiation for transportation infrastructure public-private partnership (PPP) projects was analyzed. It is shown that public participation can force enterprises to adopt non-opportunistic behavior strategy when the benefit of non-opportunistic behavior is less than that of opportunistic behavior; the increase of punishment level for the opportunistic behavior of enterprises is an important way for the avoidance of opportunistic behavior under the low probability of public participation;a more severe goverment punishment should be taken to chang enterprises’ opportunistic behavior under the low probability of public participation because the different probabilities of public participation have different requirements for government punishment.

    参考文献
    [1] GUASCH J L, BENITEZ D, PORTABLES I, et al. The renegotiation of PPP contracts: an overview of its recent evolution in Latin America[C]//International Transport Forum Discussion Papers. [S.l.]: OECD, 2014: 1-27.
    [2] SARMENTO J M, RENNEBOOG L. Renegotiating public-private partnerships[J]. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 2021, 59: 100661.
    [3] 邓斌超,赵博宇,彭鸣,等.WSR理论视角下PPP项目再谈判风险分担研究[J].建筑经济,2020,41(4):34.
    [4] LIANG Q, HU H, WANG Z, et al. A game theory approach for the renegotiation of public-private partnership projects in Chinese environmental and urban governance industry[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 238: 117952.
    [5] 何涛,赵国杰.基于随机合作博弈模型的PPP项目风险分担[J].系统工程,2011,29(4):88.
    [6] 王军武,余旭鹏.考虑风险关联的轨道交通PPP项目风险分担演化博弈模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2020,40(9):2391.
    [7] XING H, LI Y, LI H. Renegotiation strategy of public-private partnership projects with asymmetric information:an evolutionary game approach[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(7): 2646.
    [8] Lü J, LIN M, ZHOU W, et al. How PPP renegotiation behaviors evolve with traffic changes: evolutionary game approach[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2021, 147(5): 04021032.
    [9] WUYTS S, GEYSKENS I. The formation of buyer-supplier relationships: detailed contract drafting and close partner selection[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2005, 69(4): 103.
    [10] 段绪柱.公私合作制中的政府角色冲突及其消解[J].行政论坛,2012,19(4):42.
    [11] 叶晓甦,覃丹丹,石世英. PPP项目公众参与机制研究[J].建筑经济,2016,37(3):32.
    [12] 夏高锋,冯珂,王盈盈,等. PPP项目公众参与机制的国外经验和政策建议[J].建筑经济,2018,39(1):25.
    [13] GUO S. Environmental options of local governments for regional air pollution joint control: application of evolutionary game theory[J]. Economic and Political Studies, 2016, 4(3): 238.
    [14] FRIEDMAN D. Evolutionary games in economics[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1991, 59(3): 637.
    [15] 潘峰,王琳.演化博弈视角下地方环境规制部门执法策略研究[J].管理工程学报,2020,34(3):65.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

沈炜,周林意.公众参与下交通基础设施公私合作项目风险分担再谈判演化博弈[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2022,50(5):635~641

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1113
  • 下载次数: 518
  • HTML阅读次数: 54
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-29
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-06-07
文章二维码