基于改进委托代理模型的关键链项目缓冲确定方法
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

北京科技大学 经济管理学院,北京100083

作者简介:

张俊光(1972?),男,管理学博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为关键链项目管理。zhangjg@ustb.edu.cn

中图分类号:

F272

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(71572010)


Buffer Determination of Critical Chain Project Based on Improved Principal-agent Model
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [26]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为弥补现有缓冲确定方法未充分考虑人员心理行为等对抽取安全时间影响的不足,基于委托代理模型,以员工和主管间纵向信任为切入点,考虑了信任关系及行为偏好等对缓冲确定的影响,以双方自身收益最大为优化目标求解员工努力水平,并确定活动安全时间。最后,运用蒙特卡洛模拟技术验证了该方法。仿真结果表明,该方法确定的缓冲大小适当,能够以合理的缓冲为项目提供保护,缩短了项目工期,有效保证了项目完工时间。

    Abstract:

    On the ground that previous buffer determination methods do not pay much attention to the psychological and behavior impact on the safety time extraction, based on the principal-agent model, this study selects the vertical trust between employees and supervisors as the breakthrough point by taking into consideration of the influence of factors such as trust relationship and behavior preference on the determination of buffer. It takes the maximum benefit of both parties as the optimization goal to solve the effort level of employees and determine the safety time of activities. This method is validated by Monte-Carlo simulation and proves to be appropriate to protect the project with reasonable buffer. The duration is shortened, and the project completion is guaranteed.

    参考文献
    [1] GOLDRATT E M. Critical chain[M]. Great Barrington: North River Press, 1997.
    [2] NEWBOLD R C. Project management in the fast lane: Applying the theory of constraints[M]. Boca Raton: The St. Lucie Press, 1998.
    [3] 张维迎. 博弈论与信息经济学[M]. 第9版. 上海:格致出版社, 2012.ZHANG Weiying. Game theory and information economics[M]. 9th ed. Shanghai: Gezhi Press, 2012.
    [4] LAU D C, LAM L W, WEN S S. Examining the effects of feeling trusted by supervisors in the workplace: A self-evaluative perspective[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2013, 35(1):112.
    [5] 乐云, 胡毅, 李永奎, 等. 重大工程组织模式与组织行为[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018.LE Yun, HU Yi, LI Yongkui, et al. Organizational model and behavior of major projects[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2018.
    [6] TUKEL O I, ROM W O, EKSIOGLU S D. An investigation of buffer sizing techniques in critical chain scheduling[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 172(2):401.
    [7] WANG W X, WANG X, GE X L, et al. Multi-objective optimization model for multi-project scheduling on critical chain[J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2014, 68(1):33.
    [8] ZHANG J G, SONG X W, DIAZ E. Project buffer sizing of a critical chain based on comprehensive resource tightness[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 248(1):174.
    [9] IRANMANESH H, MANSOURIAN F, KOUCHAKI S. Critical chain scheduling: A new approach for feeding buffer sizing[J]. International Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 25(1):114.
    [10] 尤建新, 秦云. 基于贝叶斯网络模型的关键链项目进度管理[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(10): 1606.YOU Jianxin, QIN Yun. Critical chain project schedule management based on Bayesian network model[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science),2015,43(10): 1606.
    [11] MA G F, WU M, HAO K K, et al. A DSM-based CCPM-MPL representation method for project scheduling under rework scenarios[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 10(1):1.
    [12] WHITE D, FORTUNE J. Current practice in project management: An empirical study[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2002, 20(1):1.
    [13] 施骞, 王雅婷, 龚婷. 项目缓冲设置方法及其评价指标改进[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2012, 32(8):1739.SHI Qian, WANG Yating, GONG Ting. An improved approach for project buffer sizing and evaluation[J]. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2012, 32 (8): 1739.
    [14] PURANAM P, VANNESTE B S. Trust and governance: Untangling a tangled web[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 2009, 34(1):11
    [15] 孙娟. 激励与信任的行为经济学研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2014.SUN Juan. Behavioral economics of incentive and trust[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2014.
    [16] 牛建波, 李胜楠, 杨育龙, 等. 高管薪酬差距、治理模式和企业创新[J]. 管理科学, 2019, 32(2):77.NIU Jianbo, LI Shengnan, YANG Yulong, et al. Executive pay dispersion, Governance mode and enterprise innovation[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2019, 32 (2): 77.
    [17] ZAMBRANO A. Motivating informed decisions[J]. Economic Theory, 2019, 67(11):645.
    [18] SINCLAIR D B, SPAETER S. Incentive contracts and downside risk sharing[J]. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2018, 34(1):79.
    [19] ADAM T R, FERNANDO C S, GOLUBEVA E. Managerial overconfidence and corporate risk management[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2015, 60(2):195.
    [20] ROYAL A, TASOFF J. When higher productivity hurts: The interaction between overconfidence and capital[J]. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 2017, 67(4):131.
    [21] 陈勇强, 傅永程, 华冬冬. 基于多任务委托代理的业主与承包商激励模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2016, 19(4):45.CHEN Yongqiang, FU Yongcheng, HUA Dongdong. A multi-task incentive model between the owner and contractor[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2016, 19 (4): 45.
    [22] HOLMSTROM B. Moral hazard and observability[J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1979, 10(1):74.
    [23] 刘阳, 田军, 冯耕中, 等. 基于政企委托代理关系的应急设备储备系统激励模型[J]. 系统管理学报, 2020, 29(5):833.LIU Yang, TIAN Jun, FENG Gengzhong, et al. Incentive model of emergency equipment reservation system based on principal-agent theory[J]. Journal of Systems and Management, 2020, 29 (5): 833.
    [24] LAFFONT J, MARTIMORT D. The theory of incentives: The principal-agent model[M]. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2002.
    [25] FALLAH M, ASHTIANI B, ARYANEZHAD M B. Critical chain project scheduling: Utilizing uncertainty for buffer sizing[J]. International Journal of Research and Review for Applied Science, 2010, 3(3):280.
    [26] 别黎, 崔南方, 田文迪, 等. 基于活动敏感性的动态缓冲监控方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(10):113.BIE Li, CUI Nanfang, TIAN Wendi, et al. Research on activity sensitivity index based on dynamic buffer monitoring method[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22 (10): 113.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

张俊光,王美华.基于改进委托代理模型的关键链项目缓冲确定方法[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2022,50(12):1833~1840

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:103
  • 下载次数: 350
  • HTML阅读次数: 102
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-04
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-01-03
文章二维码