湍流模型和离散格式在汽车外流场计算中的对比
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.同济大学 汽车学院,上海 201804;2.同济大学 上海地面交通工具风洞中心,上海 201804;3.谢菲尔德大学 数学与统计学院,谢菲尔德 S3 7RH,英国;4.北京民用飞机技术研究中心,北京 102211

作者简介:

夏超(1988—),男,工学博士,硕士生导师,主要研究方向为车辆空气动力学。E-mail: chao.xia@tongji.edu.cn

通讯作者:

杨志刚(1961—),男,工学博士,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为车辆空气动力学。E-mail: zhigangyang@tongji.edu.cn

中图分类号:

U461.1

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划(2022YFE0208000);上海市重点实验室项目(18DZ2273300);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助


Comparison of Turbulent Models and Discretization Schemes Based on OpenFOAM for the Numerical Simulation of the Flow Around an Automotive Standard Model
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China;2.Shanghai Automotive Wind Tunnel Center, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China;3.School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, S3 7RH Sheffield, UK;4.Beijing Aeronautical Science & Technology Research Institute, Beijing, 102211, China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以35° Ahmed汽车标准模型为对象,基于OpenFOAM软件研究Realizable k-ε (RKE), Spalart-Allmaras (SA)和Shear Stress Transport k-ω (SST)3种湍流模型以及Linear Upwind (LU), Linear UpwindV (LUV), Localblend, Total Variation Diminishing (TVD)4种速度对流离散格式在Ahmed模型外流场计算中的表现。同时,对比了OpenFOAM、 FLUENT和STARCCM+这3个软件平台的差异。结果表明:OpenFOAM中RKE和SST湍流模型预测的阻力系数较SA模型更接近实验结果;LUV和Localblend等更稳定的格式可以一定程度上减弱计算不稳定性带来的尾迹振荡问题,但只有TVD格式能够完全的抑制这种震荡行为。3种软件平台计算的阻力系数均与实验吻合较好,其中OpenFOAM采用TVD格式的计算误差最小,仅为0.7%。此外, OpenFOAM和STARCCM+可以得到较为合理和相近的三维尾迹流场结构,而FLUENT则会高估流向C柱涡的强度。

    Abstract:

    The flow around the 35° Ahmed model is numerically explored by using three different turbulence models (the realizable k-ε (RKE), the Spalart-Allmaras (SA), and the shear stress transport k-ω (SST)) and four different velocity convection schemes (the linear upwind (LU), the linear upwindV (LUV), the localblend, and the total variation diminishing (TVD)) based on OpenFOAM. Then, two other software platforms (FLUENT and STARCCM+) are also used as references. It shows that the numerical results of RKE and SST are more reasonable than those of SA. The stable LUDSV and localblend convective scheme both partly weaken the wake oscillation caused by numerical instability, but only the TVD scheme entirely suppresses this oscillation behavior. The drag coefficients predicted by the three software platforms are all in good agreement with those of the experiment, and the error of OpenFOAM using TVD is the smallest, only 0.7%. In addition, OpenFOAM and STARCCM+ can obtain a more reasonable and similar three-dimensional wake flow structure, while FLUENT overestimates the strength of the streamwise C-pillar vortex.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

夏超,王梦佳,储世俊,杨志刚.湍流模型和离散格式在汽车外流场计算中的对比[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2022,50(S1):32~41

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-20
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-06-04
文章二维码