基于LDA模型的人工智能伦理准则体系研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.同济大学 经济与管理学院,上海 200092;2.大理大学 经济与管理学院,云南 大理 671000

作者简介:

贾婷 (1984―) ,女,讲师,博士生,主要研究方向为创新与技术管理、科技伦理治理。 E-mail: jttj@tongji.edu.cn。

通讯作者:

陈强 (1969―) ,男,教授,博士生导师,管理学博士,主要研究方向为科技创新治理。 E-mail:chenqiang@tongji.edu.cn

中图分类号:

C935

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重大项目(21ZDA018)


Latent Dirichlet Allocation Model-based Research on System of Ethical Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Economic and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;2.School of Economic and Management, Dali University, Dali 67100, China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [13]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    利用隐含狄利克雷分布(Latent Dirichlet Allocation,LDA)模型对全球人工智能伦理准则体系进行内容分析,通过对准则关键词的阶段差异对比、核心主题的聚合体系分析,总结出世界范围内人工智能治理共识的6大演变趋势,均表明实践导向已成为核心共识。但人工智能伦理准则存在“可操作性受限、考量要素不同质、伦理洗白、法律转化难”等实践适用性困境,亟须在技术、组织及制度层面弥补实践缺口。

    Abstract:

    Based on the latent Dirichlet Allocation(LDA )model, an analysis was made of the content of the global artificial intelligence ethical guidelines system.Six major trends of the worldwide consensus on artificial intelligence governance were summarized by comparing the stage differences of keywords and aggregating the core themes of the guidelines. Results indicate that practice orientation becomes the core consensus. However, the implement of the artificial intelligence ethical guidelines faces the dilemmas such as limited operability, heterogeneous considerations, ethical whitewashing, and difficult legal translation. Fianally, a discussion was made on the details to bridge the practical gap.

    参考文献
    [1] WU W, HUANG T, GONG K. Ethical principles and governance technology development of AI in China[J]. Engineering, 2020, 6(3): 302.
    [2] MCNAMARA A , SMITH J , MURPHY H E . Does ACM's code of ethics change ethical decision making in software development?[C]// the 2018 26th ACM Joint Meeting(ESEC/FSE). [S.L]: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018: 729–733.
    [3] BENKLER Y. Don’t let industry write the rules for AI[J]. Nature, 2019, 569(7755): 161.
    [4] 贾开, 薛澜. 人工智能伦理问题与安全风险治理的全球比较与中国实践[J]. 公共管理评论, 2021, 3(1): 122.JIA K, XUE L.Governance of ethical challenges and safety risks of artificial intelligence: global comparisons and practice in China[J]. China Public Administration Review, 2021, 3(1) : 122.
    [5] 中国科学院自动化研究所.LAIP-链接人工智能准则平台[EB/OL].[2023-01-02]. https://www.linking-ai-principles.org/Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences. LAIP-linking artificial intelligence principles platform [EB/OL].[2023-01-02]. https://www.linking-ai-principles.org/.
    [6] 陈小平.人工智能伦理导引[M].合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,2021.CHEN X P. Ethical guidance on artificial intelligence[M]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press,2021.
    [7] 杨慧,杨建林.融合LDA模型的政策文本量化分析——基于国际气候领域的实证[J].现代情报,2016,36(5):71.YANG H, YANG J L. Quantitative analysis of policy text merged with LDA model based on the field of international climate as demonstration[J]. Journal of Modern Information, 2016,36(5):71.
    [8] VAKKURI V, KEMELL K K, KULTANEN J, et al. The current state of industrial practice in artificial intelligence ethics[J]. IEEE Software, 2020, 37(4): 50.
    [9] KHAN A A, BADSHAH S, LIANG P, et al. Ethics of AI:a systematic literature review of principles and challenges[C]//The International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering . Gothenburg Sweden: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022: 383-392.
    [10] VAKKURI V, KEMELL K K, TOLVANEN J, et al. How do software companies deal with artificial intelligence ethics? a gap analysis[C]//The International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. Gothenburg Sweden: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022: 100-109.
    [11] MITTELSTADT B. Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI[J]. Nature Machine Intelligence,2019,1(11):501 .
    [12] 刘华. 法律与伦理的关系新论[J]. 政治与法律, 2002(3): 2.LIU H. A new theory of the relationship between law and ethics[J]. Politics and Law, 2002(3): 2.
    [13] 徐向华.中国立法关系论[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1999.XU X H. The theory of legislative relations in China [M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang People's Press,1999.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

贾婷,陈强,沈天添.基于LDA模型的人工智能伦理准则体系研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2023,51(5):652~659

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-22
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-05-30
文章二维码