钻地爆炸耦合地冲击等效计算理论与方法
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.陆军工程大学 爆炸冲击防灾减灾国家重点实验室,江苏 南京 210007;2.武汉理工大学 道路桥梁与结构工程湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430070;3.南京理工大学 机械工程学院,江苏 南京 210094

作者简介:

徐天涵(1995—),男,讲师,工学博士,主要研究方向为防灾减灾工程及防护工程。 E-mail: martinxu41@126.com

通讯作者:

王明洋(1966—),男,中国工程院院士,教授,博士生导师,工学博士,主要研究方向为防灾减灾工程及防护工程。E-mail: wmyrf@163.com

中图分类号:

O38

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(52279120)


Theory and Method of Equivalent Calculation of Coupling Ground Shock of Earth-Penetrating Explosion
Author:
Affiliation:

1.State Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention & Mitigation of Explosion & Impact, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing 210007, China;2.Hubei Key Laboratory of Roadway Bridge and Structure Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China;3.School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [22]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    钻地爆炸地冲击对地下防护工程构成重大威胁,目前常用的试验手段难以建立普遍适用的制导钻地炸弹、超高速动能弹和钻地核弹耦合地冲击效应计算方法。为此,文中从理论上揭示了钻地爆炸破坏区体积与耦合地冲击能量的关系。依据地下爆炸压缩与破坏半径和爆炸当量的关系,给出了现有主要耦合系数之间的换算公式,提出了仅需接触爆压缩半径和封闭爆压缩半径两个初始参数的耦合系数计算方法。通过与国外已有地下核试验数据和数值模拟结果对比分析,从能量耦合系数和当量耦合系数两方面,验证了该方法的正确性。结合填塞系数计算,表明美国的钻地核爆地冲击耦合系数曲线具有较好的可靠性,且偏安全。从防护工程抗钻地爆炸地冲击效应角度,选用当量耦合系数和填塞系数计算地冲击较为适宜,并给出了便于工程运用的钻地核爆当量耦合系数和填塞系数的计算公式。

    Abstract:

    The ground shock of earth-penetrating explosion poses a major threat to underground protection works. It is difficult for the existing experimental methods to establish a calculation method for the coupled ground shock effect of guided earth-penetrating bombs, hypervelocity kinetic energy bombs, and earth-penetrating nuclear bombs. In this paper, the relationship between the volume of the ground-penetrating explosion damage area and the coupled ground shock energy is revealed. According to the relationship between the radius of compression and damage areas of underground explosion and explosion equivalent, the correlation between the existing main coupling factors is clarified. A calculation method for coupling factors is proposed, which only needs two initial parameters, i.e., the radius of the compression areas of the contact explosion and the closed explosion. The correctness of the method is verified from the aspects of energy coupling factor and equivalent coupling factor through comparative analysis with the existing nuclear test and numerical simulation results of foreign countries. Combined with the calculation of the packing factor, it shows that the coupling factor curve of the ground-penetrating nuclear explosion given by the United States has a good reliability. From the perspective of protection engineering against the ground shock effect of ground-penetrating explosion, it is more appropriate to use the equivalent coupling factor and packing factor. In this paper, the calculation formulas of the equivalent coupling factor and the packing factor of the earth-penetrating nuclear explosion are given.

    参考文献
    [1] 亨利奇. 爆炸动力学及其应用[M].熊建国, 译. 北京: 科学出版社, 1987.HENRYCH J. The dynamic of explosion and its use[M]. Translated by XIONG Jianguo. Beijing: Science Press, 1987.
    [2] 奥尔连科. 爆炸物理学[M].孙承纬, 译. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011.ORLENKO L P. Explosion physics[M]. Translated by SUN Chengwei. Beijing: Science Press, 2011.
    [3] National Research Council. Committee on the effects of nuclear earth-penetrator and other weapons. Effects of nuclear earth-penetrator and other weapons[M]. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2005.
    [4] ADUSHKIN V V, SPIVAK A. Underground explosions[R]. Washington DC: Department of State, 2015.
    [5] US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons[R]. Washington DC: Department of The Army, 1986.
    [6] SHELTON T W, EHRGOTT J Q, MORAL R J, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of the ground shock coupling factor for near-surface detonations[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2014, 2014: 1.
    [7] 穆朝民, 任辉启, 石必明. 变埋深条件下混凝土中爆炸加速度的传播规律[J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(3): 1.MU Chaomin, REN Huiqi, SHI Biming. Investigation on the shock acceleration of concrete at different depths of burst[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(3): 1.
    [8] 施鹏, 邓国强, 杨秀敏, 等. 土中爆炸地冲击能量分布研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2006, 26(3): 240.SHI Peng, DENG Guoqiang, YANG Xiumin, et al. Study on ground shock energy distribution of explosion in soil[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2006, 26(3): 240.
    [9] 邓国强, 刘国军, 郑全平. 爆炸地冲击临界深度研究[J]. 防护工程, 2019, 41(2): 31.DENG Guoqiang, LIU Guojun, ZHENG Quanping. Research on the critical depth of explosion ground shock[J]. Protective Engineering, 2019, 41(2): 31.
    [10] 赵红玲, 侯爱军, 童怀峰, 等. 石灰岩中不同埋深爆炸自由场直接地冲击参数的预计方法[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2011, 31(3): 290.ZHAO Hongling, HOU Aijun, TONG Huaifeng, et al. Prediction method of the direct ground shock parameters of explosionat different buried depths in free field of limestone[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2011, 31(3): 290.
    [11] 吴祥云, 曲建波, 张光明, 等. 岩石中不同埋深爆炸自由场直接地冲击参数的预计方法[C]//第20届全国结构工程学术会议. 北京: 中国力学学会工程力学编辑部, 2011: 262-267.WU Xiangyun, QU Jianbo, ZHANG Guangming, et al. Prediction method of the direct ground shock parameters of explosion at different buried depths in free field of rock[C]// Proceedings of the Twentieth National Conference on Structural Engineering. Beijing: Engineering Mechanics, 2011: 262-267.
    [12] 叶亚齐, 任辉启, 李永池, 等. 砂质黏土中不同深度爆炸自由场地冲击参数预计方法研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(9): 1918.YE Yaqi, REN Huiqi, LI Yongchi, et al. Study of prediction of ground shock parameters in free field at different depths of burst in sandy clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(9): 1918.
    [13] 穆朝民, 任辉启, 李永池, 等. 变埋深条件下饱和土爆炸能量耦合系数的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(5): 1574.MU Chaomin, REN Huiqi, LI Yongchi, et al. Experiment study of explosion energy coupling coefficient with different burial depths in saturated soils[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(5): 1574.
    [14] 李重情, 穆朝民, 石必明. 变埋深条件下混凝土中爆炸应力传播规律的研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(6): 140.LI Chongqing, MU Chaomin, SHI Biming. Investigate on shock stress propagation in concrete at different depths under blasting[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(6): 140.
    [15] 王明洋, 李杰. 爆炸与冲击中的非线性岩石力学问题Ⅲ:地下核爆炸诱发工程性地震效应的计算原理及应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(4): 695.WANG Mingyang, LI Jie. Nonlinear mechanics problems in rock explosion and shock.Part Ⅲ: the calculation principle of engineering seismic effects induced by underground nuclear explosion and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(4): 695.
    [16] 钱七虎, 王明洋. 岩土中的冲击爆炸效应[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2010.QIAN Qihu, WANG Mingyang. Impact and explosion effects in rock and soil[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2010.
    [17] HASKELL N A. Analytic approximation for the elastic radiation from a contained underground explosion[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1967, 72(10): 2583.
    [18] SHISHKIN N I. Seismic efficiency of a contact explosion and a high-velocity impact[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, 2007, 48(2): 145.
    [19] 王明洋, 李杰, 邓国强. 超高速动能武器钻地毁伤效应与工程防护[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2021.WANG Mingyang, LI Jie, DENG Guoqiang. Earth-penetrating damage effect and engineering protection of ultra-high-speed kinetic energy weapons[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2021.
    [20] VORTMAN L J. Cratering experiments with large high‐explosive charges[J]. Geophysics, 1963, 28(3): 351.
    [21] HOLSAPPLE K A, SCHMIDT R M. On the scaling of crater dimensions 1: explosive processes[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1980, 85(B12): 7247.
    [22] CHABAI A J. On scaling dimensions of craters produced by buried explosives[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1965, 70(20): 5075.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

徐天涵,邱艳宇,谢方,王明洋.钻地爆炸耦合地冲击等效计算理论与方法[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2023,51(6):811~817

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:258
  • 下载次数: 945
  • HTML阅读次数: 1235
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-06
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-06-28
文章二维码