预氯化/粉炭工艺对原水藻源风险的控制效能
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.同济大学 环境科学与工程学院,上海 200092;2.上海城投原水有限公司,上海 200125;3.中铁上海工程局集团市政环保工程有限公司,上海201906

作者简介:

徐斌(1976—),男,教授,工学博士,主要研究方向为饮用水安全保障技术。 E-mail: tjwenwu@tongji.edu.cn

通讯作者:

张天阳(1990—),男,副教授,工学博士,主要研究方向为饮用水安全保障技术。 E-mail: tianyang1815@126.com

中图分类号:

X524

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(52270010);国家重点研发计划(2021YFC3201303);上海市青年科技启明星项目(22QC1400500)


Efficiency of Pre-chlorination/Powdered Carbon Process in Controlling Algal Risks in Raw Water
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;2.Shanghai Chengtou Raw Water Co. Ltd., Shanghai 200125, China;3.Municipal Environmental Protection Engineering Co. Ltd. of CERC Shanghai Group, Shanghai 201906, China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [11]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    选用了5种粉末活性炭,开展与预氯化联用的粉末活性炭种类优选和与氯的交互影响研究。结果表明,5种粉末活性炭均可有效吸附三氯甲烷,吸附速率变化均符合拟二级动力学规律,回归相关系数均大于0.99,木质活性炭(k=0.419 12)和椰壳活性炭Ⅰ(k=0.386 93)吸附效果最好。余氯的存在会降低粉末活性炭对三氯甲烷的吸附速率,但未改变各粉末活性炭吸附效果的优劣顺序。在原水背景下,椰壳活性炭Ⅰ和木质活性炭对2-甲基异莰醇(2-MIB)去除效率在60%以上,对土臭素(GSM)去除效率在90%以上,对三卤甲烷吸附效率最高(28%)。尽管加氯会减低活性炭的吸附效率,但是其不影响不同炭型吸附的优劣顺序,木质活性炭和椰壳活性炭Ⅰ的效果依然最佳,煤质活性炭表现较差。将粉末活性炭性质与三氯甲烷、嗅味物质的去除性能进行相关性分析发现,平均孔径、碘值、亚甲基蓝值和总孔容积的相关性较为显著,平均孔径的相关系数最高,在比选优质粉末活性炭时可以将平均孔径作为重要参考因素。

    Abstract:

    Five powdered activated carbons (PACs) were selected to carry out the study on the preference of powdered activated carbons for use in conjunction with pre-chlorination. The results show that all five powdered activated carbons can effectively adsorb trichloromethane, and the changes of adsorption rate are in accordance with the proposed second-order kinetic law, and the regression correlation coefficients are all greater than 0.99, with the best adsorption effect of wood activated carbon (k=0.419 12) and coconut shell activated carbon Ⅰ (k=0.386 93). The presence of residual chlorine decreased the rate of adsorption of trichloromethane by powdered charcoal, but it did not change the order of superiority of the adsorption effect of each powdered activated carbon. In raw water background, coconut shell activated carbon I and wood activated carbon had more than 60% removal efficiency for 2-methylisopropanol(2-MIB), more than 90% for Geosmin (GSM),and the highest adsorption efficiency for trihalomethanes (28±5%). In the combined chlorine-powdered activated carbon process, the order of the advantages and disadvantages of the different activated carbon types did not change, with wood activated carbon and coconut shell activated carbon I remaining the most effective, and coal activated carbon performing poorly. Correlation analysis of powder carbon properties with the removal performance of trichloromethane and olfactory substances found that the correlation of average pore size, iodine value, methylene blue value and total pore volume was more significant, and the correlation coefficient of average pore size was the highest, and the average pore size can be taken as an important reference factor in the comparison of high-quality powdered activated carbon.

    参考文献
    [1] KEIJOLA A M, HIMBERG K, ESALA A L, et al. Removal of cyanobacterial toxins in water treatment processes: Laboratory and pilot-scale experiments [J]. Toxicity Assessment, 1988, 3(5): 643.
    [2] HIMBERG K, KEIJOLA A M, HIISVIRTA L, et al. The effect of water treatment processes on the removal of hepatotoxins from microcystis and oscillatoria cyanobacteria: A laboratory study [J]. Water Research, 1989, 23(8): 979.
    [3] GAO N, ZHU M, ZHOU S, et al. Characteristics of disinfection by-products formation from algae organic matters in the process of chlorination[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology. Natural Science Edition, 2014,42(5):48.
    [4] KIM Y, LEE Y, GEE C S, et al. Treatment of taste and odor causing substances in drinking water[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1997,35(8):29.
    [5] ZHENG Z X, LIN Y L,FANG, et al. Removal of algae and algogenic odor compounds via combined pre-chlorination and powdered activated carbon adsorption for source water pretreatment[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2023, 304:122365
    [6] PONTIUS F W. Complying with future water regulations[J]. American Water Works Association, 1999, 91(3):46.
    [7] YANG X Y, AL-DURI B. Kinetic modeling of liquid-phase adsorption of reactive dyes on activated carbon[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface and Interface Science, 2005,287(1):25.
    [8] 应滋栋, 张斌, 张飞鸿. 影响活性炭除氯效果的相关因素[J].中国血液净化, 2015,14(3):186.YING Zidong, ZHANG Bin, ZHANG Feihong,et al. Application of coupled plasma filtration adsorption in patients with severe sepsis [J]. Chinese Journal of Blood Purification, 2015,14(3): 186.
    [9] 李学艳, 沈吉敏, 马军, 等. 预氯化对粉末活性炭吸附水中2-MIB的影响[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2008(6):874.LI Xueyan, SHEN Jimin, MA Jun, et al. Influence of prechlorination on powdered activated carbon adsorption of 2-MlB from water [J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2008, (6): 874.
    [10] 郭晓鸣. 水库水中典型嗅味物质的水厂工艺控制技术研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2018.GUO Xiaoming. Technologies in drinking water treatment plant for taste and odor compounds control from reservoirs [D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2018.
    [11] BINIAK S, PAKULA M, SZYMANSKI G, et al. Effect of activated carbon surface oxygen- and/or nitrogen-containing groups on adsorption of copper(II) ions from aqueous solution[J]. Langmuir, 1999,18(15):6117.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

徐斌,谢向弛,夏樱,周晓阳,何欢,孙东晓,张天阳.预氯化/粉炭工艺对原水藻源风险的控制效能[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2023,51(10):1502~1508

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:172
  • 下载次数: 360
  • HTML阅读次数: 989
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-09
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-11-01
文章二维码