焊钉集群式后结合超高性能混凝土组合桥面板抗弯性能
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.同济大学 土木工程学院,上海 200092;2.中铁十八局集团有限公司勘察设计院,天津 300222;3.兴泰建设集团有限公司,内蒙古 呼和浩特 010000

作者简介:

徐 晨(1982—),男,教授,博士生导师,工学博士,主要研究方向为钢与组合结构桥梁以及功能复合材料 的开发与应用。E-mail: xuchenprc@tongji. edu. cn

通讯作者:

苏庆田(1974—),男,教授,博士生导师,工学博士,主要研究方向为钢桥与钢混组合结构桥。 E-mail: sqt@tongji.edu.cn

中图分类号:

U443.33

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(51978501);内蒙古鄂尔多斯科技计划(2022YY035);国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0703402)


Flexural Performance of Post-Combined Ultra-High Performance Concrete Composite Bridge Deck with Grouped-Stud Arrangement
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;2.Survey and Design Institute, China Railway 18th Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300222, China;3.Xingtai Construction Group Co., Ltd., Hohhot 010000, China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [16]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为考察焊钉集群布置对后结合超高性能混凝土(UHPC)组合桥面板受力性能的影响,进行常规均匀焊钉布置组合桥面板及群钉布置后结合组合桥面板试件的弯曲荷载试验和基于材料塑性损伤模型的有限元参数化分析。试验结果表明,群钉布置与均匀焊钉布置试件破坏模式特征均为UHPC板压溃、钢结构U肋底面屈服,二者弹性抗弯刚度分别为232 kN·mm-1及213 kN·mm-1,承载力分别为2 154 kN及2 049 kN。U肋屈服前,两试件的界面最大滑移值均小于0.2 mm。两试件应变分布及发展规律相似,截面应变分布均近似服从平截面假定。参数化分析结果表明,群钉孔纵向布置间距由600 mm增至1 200 mm,承载力及弹性刚度无明显变化。群钉孔尺寸相同时,孔间距对UHPC黏结界面结合状态无显著影响。间距600 mm相较1 200 mm布置可更好地保证焊钉受力安全性及截面组合效应。综合对比参数化模型抗弯性能,纵向间距600 mm结合群钉孔内2×3群钉布置对正弯矩作用下后结合钢-UHPC组合桥面板受力状态改善更为有利。

    Abstract:

    To investigate the effects of grouped-stud arrangement on the mechanical performance of the post-combined UHPC (ultra-high performance concrete) composite deck, bending load tests and finite element parametric analysis based on the UHPC plastic damage model were conducted for a composite deck specimen with averagely spaced studs and a post-combined composite deck specimen with grouped-stud connection. The test results show that the failure characteristics of these two specimens are UHPC plate crushing and steel U-rib bottom yielding. The elastic flexural stiffness of the specimen with grouped-stud connection and the one with averagely spaced studs are 232 kN·mm-1 and 213 kN·mm-1 respectively, and the bearing capacity are 2 154 kN and 2 049 kN respectively. The maximum interface slip value of these two specimens is less than 0.2 mm before the U-rib yielding. These two specimens have the same strain distribution and strain development pattern. The cross-sectional strain distributions of the specimens approximately obey the plane section assumption. The parametric analysis results show that there is no significant change in the bearing capacity and elastic bending stiffness when the grouped-stud hole spacing is increased from 600 mm to 1 200 mm. When the grouped-stud hole size is the same, the hole spacing has no significant effect on the bonding state of UHPC bonding interfaces. The 600 mm spacing of grouped-stud holes can better ensure the safety of studs and the cross-sectional combination effect than the 1 200 mm arrangement. Comparing the flexural performance of parametric models, the longitudinal spacing of 600 mm combined with the 2×3 grouped-stud arrangement in the hole is more favorable to improve the stress state of the post-combined steel-UHPC composite deck under positive bending.

    参考文献
    [1] DU J, MENG W, KHAYAT K, et al. New development of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC)[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2021, 224: 109220.
    [2] 邵旭东,邱明红,晏班夫,等. 超高性能混凝土在国内外桥梁工程中的研究与应用进展[J]. 材料导报, 2017, 31(23):33.SHAO Xudong, QIU Minghong, YAN Banfu, et al. A Review on the Research and Application of Ultra-high Performance Concrete in Bridge Engineering Around the World. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(23): 33.
    [3] YUAN Y, Wu C, JIANG X. Experimental study on the fatigue behavior of the orthotropic steel deck rehabilitated by UHPC overlay[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2019, 157:1.
    [4] WEI C, ZHANG Q, YANG Z, et al. Flexural cracking behavior of reinforced UHPC overlay in composite bridge deck with orthotropic steel deck under static and fatigue loads[J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 265: 114537.
    [5] 陈宝春,李聪,黄伟,等. 超高性能混凝土收缩综述[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2018, 18(1):13.CHEN Baochun, LI Cong, HUANG Wei, et al. Review of ultra-high performance concrete shrinkage[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(1): 13.
    [6] 赵辛玮,肖汝诚,孙斌,等. 常温养护型超高性能混凝土组合桥面板收缩性能研究[J]. 中外公路, 2020, 40(3):100.ZHAO Xinwei, XIAO Rucheng, SUN Bin, et al. Study on shrinkage performance of composite bridge deck with ultra-high performance concrete cured in normal temperature[J]. Journal of China and Foreign Highway, 2020, 40(3):100
    [7] 张渤雨. 后结合钢—UHPC组合桥面板收缩效应及静力性能试验研究[J]. 上海: 同济大学, 2020.ZHANG Boyu. Experimental study on shrinkage effect and static performance of steel UHPC composite deck[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2020.
    [8] 徐晨,肖涵,王巍. 超高性能混凝土组合桥面板集群化短焊钉抗疲劳特性[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2022,50(5):667.XU Chen, XIAO Han, WANG Wei, et al. Anti-fatigue characteristics of short grouped-stud in ultra-high performance concrete composite bridge decks [J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science) , 2022,50(5):667.
    [9] 徐晨,肖涵,杨澄宇. 超高性能混凝土组合桥面板短群钉抗剪性能分析[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 53(11):4359.XU Chen, XIAO Han, YANG Chengyu. Analysis of shear behavior of short group studs in ultra-high performance concrete composite bridge deck[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2022, 53(11): 4359.
    [10] 曾田,吴平,刘鑫. 栓钉数量对组合桥面板受弯性能的影响[J]. 低温建筑技术, 2021, 43(9):73.ZENG Tian, WU Ping, LIU Xin, Influence of The Studs Number on The Bending Performance of The Composite Bridge Deck [J]. Low Temperature Architecture Technology,2021,43(9):73.
    [11] 徐晨,张乐朋,江震,等. 短焊钉布置对超高性能混凝土组合桥面板抗弯性能影响[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(8):1088.XU Chen, ZHANG Lepeng, JIANG Zhen, et al. Effects of short stud arrangement on flexural behavior of ultra-high performance concrete composite bridge decks [J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science) , 2021, 49(8):1088.
    [12] 全国混凝土标准化技术委员会. 活性粉末混凝土: GB/T 31387—2015[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015.National Standardization Technical Committee for Concrete.Reactive powder concrete: GB/T 31387—2015[S]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2015.
    [13] 冯峥,李传习,李海春,等. 超高性能混凝土湿接缝界面粘结性能[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2021, 49(11):2393.FENG Zheng, LI Chuanxi, LI Haichun, et al. Interfacial bond performance of ultrahigh performance concrete wet joints[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2021, 49(11):2393.
    [14] 曾宇,胡良明. ABAQUS混凝土塑性损伤本构模型参数计算转换及校验[J]. 水电能源科学, 2019, 37(6):106.ZENG Yu, HU Liangming. Calculation Transformation and Calibration of ABAQUS Concrete Plastic Damage Constitutive Model[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2019, 37(6):106.
    [15] 张劲,王庆扬,胡守营,等. ABAQUS混凝土损伤塑性模型参数验证[J]. 建筑结构, 2008(8):127.ZHANG Jin, WANG Qinyang, HU Shouying, et al. Parameters verification of concrete damaged plastic model of ABAQUS[J]. Building Structure, 2008(8):127.
    [16] 廖子南,邵旭东,乔秋衡,等. 钢-超高性能混凝土组合板横向受弯静力试验及有限元模拟[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(10):1954.LIAO Zinan, SHAO Xudong, QIAO Qiuheng, et al. Static test and finite element simulation analysis of transverse bending of steel-ultra-high performance concrete composite slabs. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2018, 52(10): 1954.
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

徐晨,田霖博,许琴东,于西尧,张玉彬,苏庆田.焊钉集群式后结合超高性能混凝土组合桥面板抗弯性能[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2023,51(12):1822~1834

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-27
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-12-29
文章二维码