考虑土体有限宽度的邻近建筑基坑土压力计算方法
作者:
作者单位:

1.同济大学 土木工程学院,上海 200092;2.长安大学 公路学院,西安 710064;3.上海交通大学 船舶海洋与建筑工程学院,上海 200240;4.华东建筑设计研究院有限公司 上海地下空间与工程设计研究院, 上海 200002

作者简介:

梁发云,教授,博士生导师,工学博士,主要研究方向为土力学与基础工程。 E-mail: fyliang@tongji.edu.cn

中图分类号:

TU432

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0800200)


Calculation Method of Earth Pressure in Adjacent Building Foundation Excavations Considering Finite Soils
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;2.Highway College, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China;3.School of Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;4.Shanghai Underground Space Engineering Design & Research Institute, East China Architecture Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200002, China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [24]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于极限平衡法建立土体受力平衡方程,得到有限宽度土体土压力理论解答,然后研究了土体宽高比、土体黏聚力、土体内摩擦角、墙土摩擦角等因素对土压力的影响规律,最后通过分析影响土体破坏夹角的关键因素得到墙后土压力简化计算公式。结果表明,在土体有限宽度条件下,同等高度处土楔体前后受力基本相同,土体内摩擦角对土压力的影响较大,土体黏聚力和墙土摩擦角对土压力的影响不大。土体破坏夹角大致在朗肯与库伦计算角度之间变化,墙土摩擦角、土体内摩擦角对滑裂面夹角及有限土压力计算范围均有显著影响。

    Abstract:

    Based on the limit equilibrium method, force balance equations of the soil were established to derive the theoretical solution of soil pressures for soils with finite width. Then, the effect of factors, such as the width-height ratio of the soil, soil cohesion, internal friction angle of the soil, and wall-soil friction angle on soil pressure, was investigated. By analyzing the key factors affecting the inclination angle of soil failure, a simplified formula for calculating the soil pressure behind wall was developed. The results indicate that under the condition of the finite soil width, the forces on the front and back of soil wedges at the same height are basically the same. The internal friction angle of the soil significantly influences the soil pressure, while the impact of the soil cohesion and wall-soil friction angle is relatively minor. The inclination angle of soil failure varies approximately between the angles calculated by Rankine and Coulomb theories. Moreover, the wall-soil friction angle and the internal friction angle of the soil have significant effects on the sliding surface angle and the calculation range of finite soil pressures.

    参考文献
    [1] JANSSEN H A. Versuche uber getreidedruck in silozellen [J]. Zeitschrift des Vereines Deutscher Ingenieure, 1895, 39: 1045.
    [2] FRYDMAN S, KEISSAR I. Earth pressure on retaining walls near rock faces [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1987, 113(6): 586.
    [3] TAKE W A, VALSANGKAR A J. Earth pressures on unyielding retaining walls of narrow backfill width [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2001, 38(6): 1220.
    [4] KNISS K T, YANG K-H, WRIGHT S G, et al. Earth pressures and design considerations of narrow MSE walls [C]//Proceeding of the Conference of Texas Section. Washington DC: ASCE, 2007:596-619.
    [5] YANG K H, KNISS K K, ZORNBERG J G, et al. Finite element analyses for centrifuge modeling of narrow MSE walls[C]//Proceedings of First Pan American Geosynthetics Conference. Cancun:[s.n.], 2008: 1246-1255.
    [6] HU H, YANG F, TANG H, et al. Field study on earth pressure of finite soil considering soil displacement [J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(16): 8059.
    [7] FAN C, FANG Y. Numerical solution of active earth pressures on rigid retaining walls built near rock faces [J]. Computers and Geotechnics,2010, 37: 1023.
    [8] GRECO V R. Analytical solution of seismic pseudo-static active thrust acting on fascia retaining walls [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2014, 57: 25.
    [9] GRECO V. Active thrust on retaining walls of narrow backfill width [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2013, 50: 66.
    [10] LIAO W, ZHANG J, WU J, et al. Active earth pressure of finite width soil considering intermediate principal stress and soil arching effects [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2022, 147(1): 04021294.
    [11] 高印立. 有限土体土压力的计算探讨[J]. 建筑科学, 2000(5): 53.GAO Yinli. Discussion on the calculation of earth pressure of limited soil mass [J]. Building Science, 2000(5): 53.
    [12] 中国建筑科学研究院. 北京市建筑基坑支护技术规程:DB11/ 489―2016[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2016.China Academy of Building Research. Technical specification for support of foundation pits in Beijing: DB11/489―2016 [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press , 2016.
    [13] 方焘, 杨思敏, 徐长节, 等. 浸水条件下有限土体土压力试验与数值分析研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(6): 1699.FANG Tao, YANG Simin, XU Changjie, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis study on earth pressure of limited soil mass under submerged conditions [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2019, 15(6): 1699.
    [14] 蔡叶澜. 平移模式下有限空间无黏性填土挡墙主动土压力模型试验研究[J]. 公路, 2020, 65(5): 65.CAI Yelan. Experimental study on active earth pressure model of non-cohesive backfill retaining walls in limited space under translation mode [J]. Highway, 2020, 65(5): 65.
    [15] 马平, 秦四清, 钱海涛. 有限土体主动土压力计算[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008(S1): 3070.MA Ping, QIN Siqing, QIAN Haitao. Calculation of active earth pressure of limited soil mass [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008(S1): 3070.
    [16] 应宏伟, 郑贝贝, 谢新宇. 狭窄基坑平动模式刚性挡墙被动土压力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(12): 3755.YING Hongwei, ZHENG Beibei, XIE Xinyu. Analysis of passive earth pressure on rigid retaining walls in translational mode for narrow foundation pits [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(12): 3755.
    [17] 仲山貴司, 小島謙一. 土木部門 都市部鉄道構造物の近接施工対策マニュアル[J]. 日本鉄道施設協会誌, 2007, 45(5): 394.
    [18] YANG M, TANG X, WU Z. Slip surface and active earth pressure of cohesionless narrow backfill behind rigid retaining walls under translation movement mode [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2020, 20(8): 04020115.
    [19] HANDY R L. The arch in soil arching [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1985, 111(3): 302.
    [20] 蒋波. 挡土结构土拱效应及土压力理论研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2005.JIANG Bo. Study on soil arching effect and earth pressure theory of retaining structures [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2005.
    [21] PAIK K H, SALGADO R. Estimation of active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls considering arching effects [J]. Géotechnique, 2003, 53(7): 643.
    [22] 戴斌, 胡耘, 王惠生. 上海地区相邻基坑同步开挖影响分析与实践[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(S2): 129.DAI Bin, HU Yun, WANG Huisheng. Analysis and practice of the impact of simultaneous excavation of adjacent foundation pits in Shanghai area [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(S2): 129.
    [23] 张文戈. 挡土墙的库仑土压力[J]. 力学与实践, 1997,19(5): 73.ZHANG Wenge. Coulomb earth pressure of retaining walls [J]. Mechanics in Engineering, 1997,19(5): 73.
    [24] 郑贝贝. 考虑挡墙位移及有限土体影响的土压力研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2011.ZHENG Beibei. Research on earth pressure considering the displacement of retaining walls and the influence of limited soil mass [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2011.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

梁发云,华建,李林,李明广,徐中华.考虑土体有限宽度的邻近建筑基坑土压力计算方法[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2024,52(11):1711~1719

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:110
  • 下载次数: 126
  • HTML阅读次数: 11
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-25
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-12-03
文章二维码