汽车滑行试验道路阻力和风阻系数不确定度分析
作者:
作者单位:

岚图汽车科技有限公司,武汉 430056

作者简介:

梁盛平(1991—),男,工程师,工学博士,主要研究方向为汽车空气动力学与动力经济性。E-mail:strike12138@163.com

中图分类号:

U467.5


Uncertainties of Road Load and Air Drag Coefficient for Vehicle Coast down Test
Author:
Affiliation:

VOYAH Automobile Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430056, China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [17]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [5]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    对汽车滑行试验过程中滑行速度进行统计学分析,发现各个轮次的滑行车速偏差近似与平均滑行车速呈线性关系。基于滑行车速,分别利用v-F方法和v-t方法拟合得到汽车的滑行阻力和风阻系数,分析其对应优化问题的凸性和滑行阻力、风阻系数的不确定度;结果表明,v-F方法对应拟合问题是凸的,而v-t方法对应的拟合问题是非凸的。在拟合道路载荷时,需要选择泛化能力较强的迭代算法,同时需要根据参数的物理意义,设置合理的初始值和约束边界,以便得到合理的拟合参数值和道路阻力;而且相比v-F方法,v-t方法得到的风阻系数不确定度更小,置信区间也更窄。另外,基于车辆滑行速度的统计规律,进行蒙特卡洛模拟,分别应用v-Fv-t方法,得到道路阻力和风阻系数近似为正态分布;结果表明,v-F方法会放大随机因素的影响,v-t方法得到的道路阻力和风阻系数均更为稳定。

    Abstract:

    The statistical analysis was performed to the vehicle velocity during coastdown test. It was found that the velocity deviation is approximately linear to the mean value. Based on the coasting velocity, the road load and air drag coefficient were fitted by v-t method and v-F method. At the same time, the convexity of corresponding optimization problem and the uncertainty of road load and air drag coefficient were analyzed. It was shown that fitting problem of v-F method is convex and that of v-t method is non-convex. During the fitting process, we need to choose the algorithm of high generalization capability and specify the initial values and bounds of parameters to obtain the reasonable fitting parameters and road load. Besides, the uncertainty of air drag coefficient is lower for v-t method and its confidence interval is narrower. At last, based on the statistical law of coasting velocity, the Monte Carlo method was applied to simulate the standard coast down test. It was found that the distribution of road load and air drag coefficient is approximately normal. And influence of randomness is highlighted for v-F method. The air drag coefficient and road load fitted by v-t method is more stable.

    参考文献
    [1] 环境保护部. 轻型汽车污染物排放限值及测量方法(中国第六阶段):GB 18352.6—2016[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016.Ministry of the Environmental Protection. Limits and measurement methods for emissions from light-duty vehicles(China 6):GB 18352.6—2016[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China,2016.
    [2] SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice. Road load measurement using onboard anemometry and coastdown techniques: SAE Standard J2263[S]. 2008. https://doi.org/10.4271/J2263_200812.
    [3] THOMAS S. Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles[M]. 5th ed. SAE International, 2016. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/r-430.
    [4] 付强,杨志刚,张辉香,等. 汽车风阻系数试验与数值模拟的对比分析[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2021,49(S1):48.FU Qiang, YANG Zhigang, ZHANG Huixiang, et al. Comparative analysis of automobile drag coefficient test and numerical simulation[J].Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 2021, 49(S1), 48.
    [5] LOPES R, CARBONARA A. A brief discussion on vehicle coast-down comparative analysis[G/OL]. SAE Technical Paper 2017-36-0199, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-36-0199.
    [6] KUHAR S, PATTALWAR A, GUPTA P. Coastdown road load coefficients of passenger vehicles - variation analysis and its correlation with temperature[G/OL]. SAE Technical Paper 2021-26-0487, 2021. DOI:10.4271/2021-26-0487.
    [7] MOSKALIK A. Using transmission data to isolate individual losses in coastdown road load coefficients[J] SAE Int J Advances & Curr Prac in Mobility, 2020, 2(4):2156. DOI:10.4271/2020-01-1064.
    [8] BARDEN J, GEROVA K. An on-road investigation into the conditions experienced by a heavy goods vehicle operating within the united kingdom[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2016, 48: 284. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.08.034.
    [9] SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice. SAE Wind Tunnel Test Procedure for Trucks and Buses: SAE Standard J1252[S]. 2012. https://doi.org/10.4271/J1252_201207.
    [10] HOWELL J, PASSMORE M, WINDSOR S. A drag coefficient for test cycle application[J]. SAE Int J Passeng: Cars–Mech Syst, 2018, 11(5):447. DOI:10.4271/2018-01-0742.
    [11] HOWELL J. Aerodynamic drag in a windy environment[C]// International Vehicle Aerodynamics Conference 1th 2014. Elsevier, 2015. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1533/9780081002452.1.19.
    [12] HOWELL J, PASSMORE M, BUTCHER D. An estimation of the effect of turbulence from the natural wind and traffic on the cycle-averaged-drag coefficient[J]. SAE Int J Advances & Curr Prac in Mobility, 2022, 4(5):1575. DOI:10.4271/2022-01-0896.
    [13] 龚春忠,沈羡玉,刘金子, 等.汽车滑行试验速度间隔选取对精度的影响研究[J].汽车实用技术,2019(24):58.Gong Chunzhong, Shen Xianyu, Liu Jinzi, et al. Research on the influence of speed interval selection on accuracy of vehicle coast-down test[J]. Automobile Applied Technology, 2019(24): 58.
    [14] BOYD S P. Convex optimization[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
    [15] ANDREA M, PENNECCHI F. A weighted total least-squares algorithm for any fitting model with correlated variables[J]. Metrologia, 2013, 50(6): 654. DOI 10.1088/0026-1394/50/6/654.
    [16] HIBBERT D B.The uncertainty of a result from a linear calibration[J]. Analyst, 2006,131(12): 1273. https://doi.org/10.1039/B615398D.
    [17] MOTULSKY H J, RANSNAS L A. Fitting curves to data using nonlinear regression: a practical and nonmathematical review[J]. The FASEB Journal, 1987, 1(5): 365. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.1.5.3315805.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

梁盛平,罗威,刘开贺,李洋,张永仁.汽车滑行试验道路阻力和风阻系数不确定度分析[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2024,52(S1):98~108

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:16
  • 下载次数: 40
  • HTML阅读次数: 1
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-23
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-11-20
文章二维码