2025年4月6日 周日
首页本刊简介投稿须知编委会成员论文撰写模板论文格式要求过刊全文链接审稿单联系我们English
首页 > 过刊浏览>2025年第53卷第2期 >272-279. DOI:10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.23177
PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒
基于过剩生活出行的15分钟社区生活圈评价指标
作者:
作者单位:

1.同济大学 道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室，上海 201804;2.同济大学 城市交通研究院，上海 200092

作者简介:

张琬昕，博士生，主要研究方向为交通运输规划与管理。E-mail： 2111231@tongji.edu.cn

通讯作者:

杨 超，教授，博士生导师，工学博士，主要研究方向为交通运输规划与管理。 E-mail： tongjiyc@tongji.edu.cn

中图分类号:

U491


Evaluation Indicators of 15-Minute Community-Life Circle Based on Excess Living-Trip
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education， Tongji University， Shanghai 201804， China;2.Urban Mobility Institute， Tongji University， Shanghai 201804， China

  • 摘要
    • | |
  • 访问统计
    • |
  • 参考文献 [25]
    • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
    • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    借鉴“过剩通勤”的概念，提出“过剩生活出行”的概念，并以生活出行距离为基础构建“15分钟社区生活圈”评价指标，从居民实际生活需求角度评价社区生活圈的设施建设情况。基于居民出行调查数据，选取上海市典型社区分析居民生活出行特征，对典型社区的生活圈进行评价。结果表明，越接近市中心，社区生活圈建设越完善，15 min步行可达率越好，生活出行的过剩程度越低。

    Abstract:

    Inspired by the concepts of “excess commuting”， the novel idea of “excess living-trip” is proposed， along with the development of evaluation indicators using distance as the primary measure， which assesses the adequacy of community facilities from the perspective of residents’ needs. Typical communities were selected， and the characteristics of living trips were analyzed with comparisons made based on the 2021 Shanghai residents’ travel survey data. The results reveal significant spatial differences： communities closer to downtown tend to have better infrastructure， and the phenomenon of excess living-trip is less pronounced.

    参考文献
    [1] 上海市政府. 上海城市总体规划(2017—2035)[R]. 上海:上海市政府, 2018.Shanghai Municipal Government. City master plan of Shanghai (2017—2035) [R]. Shanghai: Shanghai Municipal Government, 2018.
    [2] 上海市规划和国土资源管理局.上海市15分钟社区生活圈规划导则[R]. 上海:上海市规划和国土资源管理局, 2016.Shanghai Planning and Land Resources Administration Bureau. Shanghai planning guidance of 15-minute community-life circle[R]. Shanghai: Shanghai Urban Planning and Land Resources Administration Bureau, 2016.
    [3] 蒋博雅, 黄宝麟, 曾碧晶, 等. “六位一体”养老生活圈设施需求及适宜性评价——以南京市鼓楼区为例[J]. 科学技术与工程,2022,22(14):5860. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2022.14.046.JIANG Boya, HUANG Baolin, ZENG Bijing, et al. Demand and suitability evaluation of facilities under system of “Six in One” life circle for elderly: a case study of Gulou District, Nanjing[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2022, 22(14): 5860. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn. 1671-1815.2022.14.046.
    [4] 张雪诺, 杨超. 居住小区生活圈服务设施适老性评价[J]. 城市交通, 2022, 20(4): 35. DOI: 10.13813/j.cn 11-5141/u.2022.0405.ZHANG Xuenuo, YANG Chao. Senior-friendliness evaluation of service facilities in living circles of residential communities[J]. Urban Transport of China, 2022, 20(4): 35. DOI: 10.13813/j.cn 11-5141/u.2022.0405.
    [5] 马文军, 李亮, 顾娟, 等. 上海市15分钟生活圈基础保障类公共服务设施空间布局及可达性研究[J]. 规划师, 2020, 36(20): 11.MA Wenjun, LI Liang, GU Juan,et al. Research on the spatial layout and accessibility of basic security public service facilities in the 15-minute living circle in Shanghai[J]. Planner, 2020, 36(20): 11.
    [6] 王宣儒, 刘帅, 高安培, 等. 社区生活圈质量评价体系建构与空间特征分析——以虹口区为例[J]. 安徽建筑, 2022, 29(7): 8. DOI: 10.16330/j.cnki. 1007-7359.2022.07.003.WANG Xuanru, LIU Shuai, GAO Anpei,et al. Construction of quality evaluation system and spatial-characteristic analysis of community living circle: a case of Hongkou District[J]. Anhui Architecture, 2022, 29(7): 8. DOI: 10.16330/j.cnki. 1007-7359. 2022.07.003.
    [7] 彭正洪, 李承聪, 焦洪赞. 基于手机信令与电子地图POI数据的社区生活圈测度方法——以武汉市为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2022(2): 45. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn. 1009-6000.2022.02.007.PENG Zhenghong, LI Chengcong, JIAO Hongzan. Measurement method for community life-circle based on mobile signaling data and online map POI data: a case study of Wuhan[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2022(2): 45. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn. 1009-6000.2022.02.007.
    [8] 朱晓东. 上海30 min体育生活圈建设评价指标体系研究[J]. 首都体育学院学报, 2016, 28(5): 406.ZHU Xiaodong. Study on the evaluation index system of Shanghai 30’ sports life cycle construction[J]. Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, 2016,28(5):406.
    [9] 韩增林, 董梦如, 刘天宝, 等. 社区生活圈基础教育设施空间可达性评价与布局优化研究——以大连市沙河口区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(11): 1774.HAN Zenglin, DONG Mengru, LIU Tianbao,et al. Spatial accessibility evaluation and layout optimization of basic education facilities in community life circle: a case study of Shahekou in Dalian[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(11): 1774.
    [10] 华晨, 周学文, 李咏华, 等. 社区商业设施空间步行可达性评价及布局优化——以绍兴市三区为例[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2022, 56(2): 368. DOI: 10.3785/j.issn. 1008-973X.2022.02.018.HUA Chen, ZHOU Xuewen, LI Yonghua, et al. Spatial walking accessibility evaluation and layout optimization of community commercial facilities: the case of Shaoxing[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2022, 56(2): 368. DOI: 10.3785/j.issn. 1008-973X.2022.02.018.
    [11] 邱明, 王敏. 面向不同年龄社区生活圈的公园绿地服务供需关系评价——以上海某中心城区为例[C] //中国风景园林学会2018年会论文集. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2018: 236-242.QIU Ming, WANG Min. The demand-supply relation analysis of park services of a central district in Shanghai based on community life circle of different age groups[C]// Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Meeting of the Chinese Society of Landscape Architecture. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2018: 236-242.
    [12] 肖凤玲, 杜宏茹, 张小雷. “15分钟生活圈”视角下住宅小区与公共服务设施空间配置评价——以乌鲁木齐市为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(2): 574. DOI: 10.12118/j.issn. 1000-6060.2021.02.28.XIAO Fengling, DU Hongru, ZHANG Xiaolei. Evaluation of spatial allocation of residential quarters and public service facilities based on the perspective of “15 minutes life circle”: a case study of Urumqi city[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(2): 574. DOI: 10.12118/j.issn. 1000-6060.2021.02.28.
    [13] MORENO C, ALLAM Z, CHABAUD D, et al. Introducing the “15-minute city”: sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities[J]. Smart Cities, 2021, 4(1): 93. DOI: 10.3390/smartcities4010006.
    [14] LI Yanxi, CHAI Yanwei, CHEN Zifeng, et al. From lockdown to precise prevention: adjusting epidemic-related spatial regulations from the perspectives of the 15-minute city and spatiotemporal planning[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2023, 92. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104490.
    [15] SMALL K A, SONG S. “Wasteful” commuting: a resolution[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1992, 100(4): 888.
    [16] HAMILTON B W. Wasteful commuting[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1982, 90(5): 1035.
    [17] WHITE M J. Urban commuting journeys are not “Wasteful”[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1988, 96(5): 1097.
    [18] HORNER M W. Extensions to the concept of excess commuting[J]. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2002, 34(3): 543.
    [19] CHARRON M. From excess commuting to commuting possibilities: more extension to the concept of excess commuting[J]. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2007, 39(5): 1238.
    [20] ROY J R, BROTCHIE J F. Some supply and demand considerations in urban spatial interaction models[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1984, 16(9): 1137.
    [21] CHOWDHURY T A, SCOTT D M, KANAROGLOU P S. Urban form and commuting efficiency: a comparative analysis across time and space[J]. Urban Studies, 2013, 50(1): 191.
    [22] THURSTON L, YEZER A M J. Testing the monocentric urban model: evidence based on wasteful commuting[J]. Real Estate Economics, 1991, 19(1): 41.
    [23] HORNER M W. How does ignoring worker class affect measuring the jobs―housing balance？ Exploratory spatial data analysis[J]. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010, 2163:57.
    [24] 杨超, 汪超. 城市过剩通勤与职住平衡模型[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(11): 1712. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn. 0253-374x.2013.11.017.YANG Chao, WANG Chao. Excess commuting and jobs-housing balance model[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2013, 41(11): 1712. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn. 0253-374x.2013.11.017.
    [25] 杨超, 蒲一超, 汪超. 考虑居民收入差异的城市过剩通勤模型[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 42(4): 564. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn. 0253-374x.2014.04.011.YANG Chao, PU Yichao, WANG Chao. Excess commuting model with a consideration of resident income difference[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2014, 42(4): 564. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn. 0253-374x.2014.04.011.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

张琬昕,杨超.基于过剩生活出行的15分钟社区生活圈评价指标[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2025,53(2):272~279

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:308
  • 下载次数: 341
  • HTML阅读次数: 286
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-29
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-03-07
文章二维码

您是本站第 10439553 访问者

版权所有：《同济大学学报（自然科学版）》     主管单位：教育部    主办单位：同济大学

地址：上海市四平路1239号同济大学内    邮编：200092    电话：021-65982344     E-mail：zrxb@tongji.edu.cn

本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计