2025-5-10- Sunday
HomeIntroductionEditorial boardContact usChinese
Home > Archive>Volume 43, Issue 12, 2015 >1771-1776. DOI:10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.2015.12.001
PDF HTML XML Export Cite reminder
Modal Pushover Analysis of Spatial Structures Based on the Overall Structural Stiffness Parameter
CSTR:
[cstr]
Author:
Clc Number:

TU973+.31

  • Article
    • | |
  • Metrics
    • |
  • Reference [15]
    • |
  • Related [20]
    • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Due to the three dimensional force transmission mechanism, the application of pushover method for seismic response analysis of spatial structures is limited by the following issues: firstly, the representative nodal load displacement relationship can hardly be specified; secondly, there are no direct interrelationship among structural load, nodal displacement, and support reaction for spatial structures; thirdly, it is difficult to compute the capacity curves of spatial structures. In this paper, static elasto plastic analysis is carried out by using the load patterns generated from the structural vibration modes. Based on the overall stiffness parameter, the load displacement relationship of the modified equivalent single degree of freedom (ESDOF) system of each dominating mode, independent on support reactions, is obtained accordingly. And the equivalent mass of the modified ESDOF system is calculated by utilization of the mode period. Then the newly established ESDOF systems of the dominate modes are adopted in a modified modal pushover analysis (MPA) procedure. Numerical example shows that the modified MPA method, based on the overall structural stiffness parameter, overcomes the problem existing in the establishment of the structural capacity curve for the spatial structures. The computing consumption of the method given in this paper is 10% of the elasto plastic time history analysis (THA) method, meanwhile, in the seismic input direction, the nodal displacement data generated by the proposed method shows a 28% deviation compared with the THA method.

    Reference
    [1] Chandler A M, Lam N T K. Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: a multi-disciplinary review[J]. Engineering structures, 2001, 23(12): 1525-1543.
    [2] Fajfar P. A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design[J]. Earthquake spectra, 2000, 16(3): 573-592.
    [3] Gupta A, Krawinkler H. Estimation of seismic drift demands for frame structures[J]. Earthquake engineering structural dynamics, 2000, 29(9): 1287-1305.
    [4] 毛建猛, 谢礼立, 翟长海. 模态 pushover 分析方法的研究和改进[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2007, 26(6): 50-55.Mao Jianmeng, Xie Lili, Zhai Changhai. Studies and improvements in modal pushover analysis[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2007, 26(6): 50-55.
    [5] Vamvatsikos D, Cornell C A. Applied incremental dynamic analysis[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2004, 20(2): 523-553.
    [6] 钱稼茹, 纪晓东, 范重, 等. 国家体育场大跨度钢结构罕遇地震性能分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2007, 28(2): 17-25.Qian Jiaru, Ji Xiaodong, Fan Zhong, et al. Seismic behavior analysis of large-span steel structure of the National Stadium under severe earthquake[J]. Journal of Building Struxtures, 2007, 28(2): 17-25.
    [7] Ohsaki M, Zhang J Y. Prediction of inelastic seismic responses of arch-type long-span structures using a series of multimodal pushover analysis[J]. Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, 2012:1-11.
    [8] Nakazawa S, Kato S, Takeuchi T, et al. State-of-the-Art of Seismic Response Evaluation Methods for Metal Roof Spatial Structures[J]. Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, 2012, 53(2): 117-130.
    [9] 郑宇淳. 大跨度拱形立体桁架结构的推到分析[D]. 天津：天津大学,2007.Zheng Yuchun. Pushover analysis of long span tridimensional steel truss arch[D]. Tian Jin: Tianjin University, 2007
    [10] 杨木旺. 大跨度刚性空间结构竖向地震的静力弹塑性分析[D]. 上海：同济大学,2007.Yang Muwang. Static elasto-plastic analysis of long-span rigid spatial structures under vertical earthquake[D]. Shang Hai: Tongji University, 2007
    [11] Bergan P G, Horrigmoe G, Br?keland B, et al. Solution techniques for non?linear finite element problems[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1978, 12(11): 1677-1696.
    [12] Lestuzzi P, Belmouden Y, Trueb M. Non-linear seismic behavior of structures with limited hysteretic energy dissipation capacity[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 5(4): 549-569.
    [13] 杨溥, 李英民, 熊振勇, 等. 能力曲线折线简化方法对比研究[J]. 重庆建筑大学学报, 2005, 27(4): 59-63.Yang Pu, Li Yingmin, Xiong Zhenyong, et al. Study on the comparison of different methods of simplifying capacity spectrum[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jianzhu University, 2005, 27(4): 59-63.
    [14] Chopra A K, Goel R K. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings[J]. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 2002, 31(3): 561-582.
    [15] Kunnath S K. Identification of modal combinations for nonlinear static analysis of building structures[J]. Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2004, 19(4): 246-259.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

XIANG Yang, LUO Yongfeng, GUO Xiaonong, SHEN Zuyan. Modal Pushover Analysis of Spatial Structures Based on the Overall Structural Stiffness Parameter[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(12):1771~1776

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1945
  • PDF: 1271
  • HTML: 77
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:November 11,2014
  • Revised:October 18,2015
  • Adopted:September 14,2015
  • Online: December 28,2015
Article QR Code

Youare the 96855 visitor to this site

Copyright:JOURNAL OF TONGJI UNIVERSITY     Director:The Ministry of Education    The host:Tongji university.

Address:上海市四平路1239号同济大学内    Postcode:200092    TEL:86-21-65982344     E-mail:zrxb@tongji.edu.cn

Supported byBeijing E-Tiller Technology Development Co.,Ltd.