Drivers’ Collision Avoidance Limit by Braking and Steering
CSTR:
Author:
Clc Number:

U461.9

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [10]
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by [0]
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The limit of drivers’ capacity of collision avoidance by braking and steering were analyzed in this paper based on the charateristics of drivers’ collision avoidance manervers and vehicle dynamics. The critical values of timetocollision(TTC) of these two different collision avoidance manervers were obtained and compared. The influences of road coefficient and overlap rate were also analyzed. The results quantitatively show that under certain conditions such as high relative speed, low friction coefficient, and small lateral overlap, the collision avoidance by steering is easier than by braking.

    Reference
    [1] Eckert A, Hartmann B, Sevenich M, et al.. Emergency steer & brake assist: a systematic approach for system integration of two complementary driver assistance systems. Proc 22nd Int Technical Conf Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Washington DC, USA; 2011.
    [2] Bevan G, Gollee H, O'Reilly J. Trajectory generation for road vehicle obstacle avoidance using convex optimization. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering. 2010,224(4):455-73.
    [3] Hattori Y, Ono E, Hosoe S. Optimum vehicle trajectory control for obstacle avoidance problem. Mechatronics, IEEE/ASME Transactions on. 2006,11(5):507-12.
    [4] M?rtensson J, Nybacka M, Jerrelind J, et al.. Evaluation of safety distance in vehicle platoons by combined braking and steering. 11th International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control, Sept 9-12, 2012, Seoul, Korea; 2012: Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (JSAE).
    [5] Fausten M. Accident avoidance by evasive manoevres[C]//Proceedings of the 4th Tagung Sicherheit durch Fahrerassistenz (TVSD), Munich, Germany, 2010.
    [6] Li L, Zhu X, Ma Z. Driver braking behaviour under near–crash scenarios. International Journal of Vehicle Safety. 2014, 7(3): 374-389.
    [7] Biral F, Da Lio M, Bertolazzi E. Combining safety margins and user preferences into a driving criterion for optimal control-based computation of reference maneuvers for an ADAS of the next generation. Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2005 Proceedings IEEE; 2005: IEEE.
    [8] Bertolazzi E, Biral F, Da Lio M, et al. Supporting drivers in keeping safe speed and safe distance: the SASPENCE subproject within the European framework programme 6 integrating project PReVENT. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on. 2010,11(3):525-38.
    [9] 刘英杰, 赵又群, 许健雄, 等. 基于 Gauss 伪谱法的紧急避让汽车操纵逆动力学[J]. 机械工程学报, 2013, 48(22): 127-132.Liu Y, Zhao Y, Xu J, et al. Vehicle Handling inverse dynamics based on gauss pseudospectral method while encountering emergency collision avoidance[J]. Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao(Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering), 2012, 48(22): 127-132.
    [10] Patterson MA, Rao AV. GPOPS-II: A MATLAB software for solving multiple-phase optimal control problems using hp-adaptive gaussian quadrature collocation methods and sparse nonlinear programming. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS). 2014,41(1):1.
    Related
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

LI Lin, ZHU Xichan, CHEN Hailin. Drivers’ Collision Avoidance Limit by Braking and Steering[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2016,44(11):1743~1748

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:December 09,2015
  • Revised:April 17,2016
  • Adopted:July 07,2016
  • Online: December 02,2016
Article QR Code