Influence of Wind Tunnel Structure on Static Pressure Coefficient and Static Pressure Gradient of the Test Section
CSTR:
Author:
Clc Number:

U467.1

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [11]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The static pressure coefficient and static pressure gradient are key parameters to estimate the flow quality of automotive wind tunnel test section. Numerical simulation was used along with wind tunnel test to study the influence of wind tunnel structure on static pressure coefficient and static pressure gradient of the test section. It is found that real results can be obtained by simulation of the static pressure coefficient and static pressure gradient using the computational model with two corners. No matter it is big or small nozzle, the static pressure coefficient and static pressure gradient corresponding to the collector height of 270 mm is the gentlest and the effective length of test section is the longest, which has the slightest impact on measurement. For the big nozzle, the static pressure coefficient and static pressure gradient at the position of collector is decreasing constantly with the reduction of the height of collector. When the height of collector is 240 mm, the static pressure coefficient and static pressure gradient close to the collector becomes negative. For the small nozzle, the area of the collector is much larger than that of the nozzle so that the velocity of airflow at the collector decreases, which contributes to a positive value of the local static pressure coefficient and static pressure gradient.

    Reference
    [1]Hucho W H. Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles : from Fluid Mechanics to Vehicle Engineering[M]. Butterworths, 1987.
    [2]Fenton J. Advances in Vehicle Design[M]. Control,1999.
    [3]国防科学技术工业委员会.GJB 1179-1991 高速风洞和低速风洞流场品质规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1992.Commission of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense.GJB 1179-1991 Specification for Flow Quality of High and Low Speed Wind Tunnels[S]. Beijing:China Standards Press, 1992.
    [4]Edward D, Sam M, Joseph Y. Improving Open Jet Wind Tunnel Axial Pressure Gradient[R]. Presented at the 7th FKFS Conference: Progress in Vehicle Aerodynamic and Thermal Management, Stuttgart, Germany, 2009.
    [5]Deutenbach R. Influence of Plenum Dimensions on Drag Measurements in 3/4 Open Jet Automotive Wind Tunnels[C]. SAE Technical Paper, 951000.
    [6]Wiedemann J, Wickern G. Audi Aero-Acoustic Wind Tunnel[C]. SAE Technical Paper, 930300.
    [7]Hoffmann J, Martindale B. Effect of Test Section Configuration on Aerodynamic Drag Measurements[C]. SAE Technical Paper, 2001-01-0631.
    [8]Moo S K, Jung H L, Jung D K, etc. Hyundai Full Scale Aeroacoustic Wind Tunnel[C]. SAE Technical Paper, 2001-01-0629.
    [9]李启良,陈力,杨志刚,徐玉冬.不同扩散角下汽车风洞试验段轴向静压系数[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 42(8): 1227~1230Li Qiliang,Chen Li,Yang Zhigang,Xu Yudong. Axial Static Pressure Coefficients of Automotive Wind Tunnel Test Section at Different Diffuser Angles[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science),2014, 42(8): 1227~1230
    [10]Fluent Inc. FLUENT User’s Guide. Fluent Inc, 2003.
    [11]张建立,张国忠. CFD在汽车空气动力学研究中的应用[J].沈阳大学学报,2006,18(4):15Jianli zhang,Guozhong zhang. Application of CFD Methods in Auto Aerodynamics Research [J]. Journal of Shenyang University, 2006, 18(4): 15
    Cited by
Get Citation

LI Qiliang, DAI Wentong, DU Kaiyan, YANG Zhigang. Influence of Wind Tunnel Structure on Static Pressure Coefficient and Static Pressure Gradient of the Test Section[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2017,45(10):1506~1511

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:March 22,2017
  • Revised:July 11,2017
  • Adopted:June 06,2017
  • Online: October 24,2017
Article QR Code