Analysis of Choices of Electric Car Sharing Based on Nested Logit Model

doi:10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.2019.01.006

Home > Archive>Volume 47, Issue 01, 2019 >0047-0055. DOI:10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.2019.01.006

Analysis of Choices of Electric Car Sharing Based on Nested Logit Model
DOI:
                        10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.2019.01.006
                    
CSTR:
                        [cstr]
                    
Author:
                        LIU XiangLIU Xiang
Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education， Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China；College of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Find this author on All Journals
Find this author on BaiDu
Search for this author on this site
DONG DecunDONG Decun
Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education， Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Find this author on All Journals
Find this author on BaiDu
Search for this author on this site
WANG NingWANG Ning
College of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Find this author on All Journals
Find this author on BaiDu
Search for this author on this site
ZHANG WenjianZHANG Wenjian
College of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Find this author on All Journals
Find this author on BaiDu
Search for this author on this site

                    
Affiliation:
Clc Number:U491
Fund Project:

Article

Figures

Metrics

Reference [20]

Cited by

Materials

Comments

Abstract:

The Nested Logit Model was used to analyze the questionnaire investigation based on users’ travel modes choices. The factors influencing on users’ travel modes choices were researched. Users’ selection probability and sensitivity of travel modes were computed. The results show that cost, station distance, trip distance, driving-age, ownership of private cars and users’ age make a difference on selection probability of electric car sharing. Selection probability of electric car sharing based on RP(revealed preference) data is 2.36% while based on SP(stated preference) data is 3.30%. If cost of electric car sharing increase 1 yuan/kilometer, based on RP data selection probability of electric car sharing will decrease by 8.6% while based on SP data decrease by 8.9%. If station distance of electric car sharing increase 1 kilometer, based on RP data selection probability of electric car sharing will decrease by 43.7% while based on SP data decrease by 21.1%.

Key words:electric car sharing; analysis of travel modes choices; Nested Logit Model; revealed preference(RP); stated preference(SP)

Reference

[1] Martin E, Shaheen S. The impact of carsharing on household vehicle ownership[J]. University of California Transportation Center Working Papers, 2011, 38(38).

[2] Michael Glotz-Richter. Car-Sharing – “Car-on-call” for reclaiming street space[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 48:1454-1463.

[3] Costain C, Ardron C, Habib K N. Synopsis of users'' behaviour of a carsharing program: A case study in Toronto[C]// Meeting of Transportation Research Board. 2012.

[4] Crane K, Ecola L, Hassell S, et al. Energy Services Analysis:An Alternative Approach for Identifying Opportunities to Reduce Emissions of Greenhouse Gases[M]. RAND Corporation, 2012.

[5] Luca S D, Pace R D. Modelling users’ behaviour in inter-urban carsharing program: A stated pReference approach[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2015, 71(C):59-76.

[6] Baptista P, Melo S, Rolim C. Energy, Environmental and Mobility Impacts of Car-sharing Systems. Empirical Results from Lisbon, Portugal ☆[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 111(3):28-37.

[7] Stasko T H, Buck A B, Gao H O. Carsharing in a university setting: Impacts on vehicle ownership, parking demand, and mobility in Ithaca, NY[J]. Transport Policy, 2013, 30(4):262-268.

[8] Sierzchula W, Bakker S, Maat K, et al. The competitive environment of electric vehicles: An analysis of prototype and production models[J]. Environmental Innovation Societal Transitions, 2012, 2(2):49-65.

[9] Brady, John, O’Mahony, et al. Travel to work in Dublin. The potential impacts of electric vehicles on climate change and urban air quality[J]. Transportation Research Part D Transport Environment, 2011, 16(2):188-193.

[10] Hawkins T R, Singh B, Majeau-Bettez G, et al. Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2013, 17(1):53-64.

[11] Hanschke C B. Duurzame innovatie in het wegverkeer[J]. 2009.

[12] Meijkamp R. Changing consumer behaviour through eco-efficient services: an empirical study of car sharing in the Netherlands[J]. Business Strategy the Environment, 2001, 7(4):234-244.

[13] Shaheen S A, Barth M. THE POTENTIAL FOR SHARED-USE VEHICLE SYSTEMS IN CHINA[J]. Davis, 2003.

[14] Seik F T. Vehicle ownership restraints and car sharing in Singapore[J]. Habitat International, 2000, 24(1):75-90.

[15] Barth M, Todd M. Simulation model performance analysis of a multiple station shared vehicle system[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 1999, 7(4): 237-259.

[16] Brook David. Carsharing–start up issues and new operational models[C]//Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. 2004.

[17] Luè A, Colorni A, Nocerino R, et al. Green Move: An Innovative Electric Vehicle-Sharing System[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 48:2978-2987.

[18] Shaheen S A, Cano L A, Camel M L. Electric Vehicle Carsharing in a Senior Adult Community in San Francisco Bay Area[C]//Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting. 2013 (13-4491).

[19] Kim D, Ko J, Park Y. Factors affecting electric vehicle sharing program participants’ attitudes about car ownership and program participation[J]. Transportation Research Part D, 2015, 36:96-106.

[20] 黄肇义,杨东援.国外小汽车共用的发展状况[J].城市规划汇刊,2000,6(50): 2.HUANG Zhaoyi, YANG Dongyuan. Development of abroad car sharing[J]. Journal of City Planning, 2000, 6(20):2.

Get Citation

LIU Xiang, DONG Decun, WANG Ning, ZHANG Wenjian. Analysis of Choices of Electric Car Sharing Based on Nested Logit Model[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(01):0047~0055

Copy

Article Metrics

Abstract:
PDF:
HTML:
Cited by:

History

Received:March 26,2018
Revised:November 06,2018
Adopted:August 15,2018
Online: January 25,2019
Published:

Get Citation

Share

Article Metrics

History

Article QR Code