Broken Wire Identification in Bridge Cables Based on Magnetic Flux Leakage Examination
CSTR:
Author:
Clc Number:

TU997; U446.3

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [20]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    A damageidentification method based on effective shorttime crosscorrelation (STCC) was proposed to identify wire breakage, in the case of low signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio with the magnetic flux leakage (MFL) detection of bridge cables. The corresponding signal fragment from repeated tests of the cable was extracted for effective STCC analysis. The effective STCC was renormalized to combine with the characteristics of short-time energy. Then, the double threshold method was used to identify the broken wire damage. A full-scale cable model with various kinds of wire breakage was made for MFL examination, and the experimental results were used to verify the proposed method. The results show that the proposed method improves the damagerecognition accuracy by about 15.7%~16.9% compared with the existing methods, and obtains high identification accuracy even with low SNR ratio.

    Reference
    [1] Martin B T. Four decades of inspecting a suspension bridge cable[C]// IABMAS 2014: 7th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management. Shanghai: Taylor Francis Group, 2014: 57-72.
    [2] Watson S C, Stafford D. Cables in trouble[J]. Civil Engineering, 1988, 58(4): 38-41.
    [3] Mcgogney C H, Magnetic flux leakage for bridge inspection[C]. Proceedings of the Structures Congress, Irvine CA USA, 1993:31-44
    [4] Ebeling R M, Strom R W, Hite Jr J E, et al. Assessing corrosion damage and corrosion progression in multistrand anchor systems in use at corps projects: ERDC TR-13-3 [R]. America: The US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, 2013.
    [5] Dost Y, Apayd?n N, Dedeo?lu E, et al. Non-Destructive Testing of Bosphorus Bridges. In: Büyük?ztürk O and Ta?demir MA (eds) Nondestructive Testing of Materials and Structures[M], Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013, 819-825.
    [6] Baskaran R,Janawadkar M P. Defect localization by orthogonally projected multiple signal classification approach for magnetic flux leakage fields[J]. NDT E International, 2008,41: 416-419
    [7] Zhang D,Zhao M,Zhou Z, et al. Characterization of Wire Rope Defects with Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix of Magnetic Flux Leakage Images[J]. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 2013, 32 (1): 37-43
    [8] Kim J,Park S. Magnetic flux leakage–based local damage detection and quantification for steel wire rope non-destructive evaluation[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X17721038
    [9] 彭丽莎,黄松岭,赵伟,等.漏磁检测中的缺陷重构方法[J]. 电测与仪表,2015,52(13): 1-6, 30.Peng LS, Huang SL,Zhao W,et al. Defect reconstruction method for magnetic flux leakage testing[J]. Electrical Measurement Instrumentation, 2015,52(13): 1-6, 30.
    [10] 井陆阳,谭继文,战卫侠.用于钢丝绳断丝定量识别的神经网络模型参数优化[J]. 煤矿机械,2012,33(10): 78-80.Jing LY, Tan JW, Zhan WX. Parameter Optimization of Neural Network for Quantitative Identification of Broken Wire Rope[J]. Coal Mine Machinery, 2012,33(10): 78-80.
    [11] Park S,Kim J,Lee C, et al. Magnetic Flux Leakage Sensing-Based Steel Cable NDE Technique[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2014, 2014,Article ID: 929341.
    [12] Xu J,Wu X,Cheng C, et al. A Magnetic Flux Leakage and Magnetostrictive Guided Wave Hybrid Transducer for Detecting Bridge Cables[J]. Sensors, 2012(12): 518-533
    [13] 王阳生,师汉民,杨叔子,等.检测局部异常信号的一个新特征量[J].华中科技大学学报(自然科学版),1988,16(3): 61-67.Wang YS, Shi HM, Yang SZ, et al. A New Characteristic Quantity for Interpretation of Partially Abnormal Signal[J]. Journal of Huazhong University o f Science Technology, 1988,16(3): 61-67.
    [14] 谭继文.钢丝绳LF型断丝定量识别的神经网络法[J].矿山机械,2002(03): 37-39.Tan JW. Nervous Network Method Identifying Cracked Wires of a Rope Quantitatively[J]. Ming Processing Equipment, 2002(03): 37-39.
    [15] 武新军,康宜华,程顺峰.基于事例推理的漏磁无损检测数据处理方法[J].无损检测,2003(07): 365-368.Wu XJ, Kang YH, Cheng SF. Case-Based Reasoning Interpretation of the Data from Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing[J].NDT, 2003(07): 365-368.
    [16] 陈厚桂,康宜华,武新军.基于相关性的钢丝绳断丝特征提取[J].机械工程学报,2006, 42(05): 224-228.Chen HG, Kang YH, Wu XJ. Correlation Analysis of Broken Wire Signal in Wire Rope Testing[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2006, 42(05): 224-228.
    [17] 李再国,张友明.漏磁检测定量分析中的信号处理技术[J]. 石油仪器,2010,24(03): 76-78Li ZG, Zhang YM. The Signal Processing Technology in Quantitative Analysis of Magnetic Flux Leakage Detecting [J]. Petroleum Instruments, 2010,24(03): 76-78
    [18] Kobiyama Y,Zhao Q,Omomo K, et al. Analyzing Resident Life Cycle Based on Short-Time Cross-Correlation[C]. IEEE Region 10 Conference, 2015.
    [19] 范群贞.运动模糊图像复原方法的研究[J].电子测量技术,2013, 36(06): 73-76.Fan QZ. Research on Motion Blurred Image Restoration Method[J]. Electronic Measurement Technology, 2013, 36(06): 73-76.
    [20] Wang HY, Xu Z, Hua G, et al. Key technique of a detection sensor for coal mine wire ropes[J]. Mining Science and Technology, 2009, 19 (2): 170-175
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

XIN Rongya, ZHANG Qiwei. Broken Wire Identification in Bridge Cables Based on Magnetic Flux Leakage Examination[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(04):0458~0466

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1284
  • PDF: 812
  • HTML: 1004
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:May 11,2018
  • Revised:February 18,2019
  • Adopted:December 13,2018
  • Online: April 30,2019
Article QR Code