Impact of Time-Sharing Automobile on Modal Shift Behavior in Urban Complex
CSTR:
Author:
Clc Number:

U121

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [19]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    This paper focuses on the comprehensive travel cost of motorized trips to urban complex, and adopts the scenario analysis method to construct a multinomial logit model to study the impact of changes in the cost of private cars, taxi, time-sharing automobiles, and public transportation on travel behavior. The analysis shows that travelers become increasingly sensitive to out-of-car time than to in-car time, with the mode transferring from “private” to “public”, namely private car–taxi– time-sharing automobile–public transportation. The time-sharing automobile with the encryption of the location, the shortening of outside-car time, the alternative to private car, public transportation, and other means of travel is significant, which cannot reduce the proportion of private car use. At the same time, when the travelling time is shortened, the rental fee is increased, and the time for public transportation is shortened, the proportion of public transport will not be affected. With the development of time-sharing automobile, the strategy for public transport priority should still be pursued.

    Reference
    [1]Customer Survey Car-Sharing Brussels[R]. Project MOMO Grant agreement, 2009.
    [2]Report Survey on Satisfaction of Cambio Client in Wallonia[R]. MOMO Grant agreement,2010
    [3]Millard Ball A. Car sharing: Where and how it succeds[M]. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board. 2005
    [4]周彪, 周溪召, 李彬. 基于上海市消费者的汽车共享选择分析[J]. 上海理工大学学报, 2014, 36(1): 97-102.
    [5]Hui Ying, WANG Mingquan. Consuming demand incentive of potential car sharing users and its developing policy:take Shanghai as a case study[C](EI). 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, 1031-1034, Changsha, 2010
    [6]何璇.北京分时租赁消费者满意度与忠诚度研究[D].北京交通大学,2017
    [7]Brian Higginbotham. Carsharing: increasing rural transportation options in the great central valley[R]. Sustainable Communities Leadership Program Report. California,2000
    [8]葛王琦,邵丹,程杰.汽车分时租赁对上海市小客车发展的影响[C].中国城市交通规划年会论文集,2017
    [9]杨东援.共享交通与空间资源共享[J].交通与港航,2017.4(2):1
    [10]程苑.汽车共享下的城市交通出行方式博弈研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学,2015
    [11]何建中. 城市地区私人小汽车出行成本构成理论及其量化评估方法研究[D].北京交通大学,2009.
    [12]熊思敏.多种政策下新加坡拥挤收费效果及作用机理研究[D].同济大学硕士学位论文.2014
    [13]叶盈. 出行方式链成本测算方法研究[D]. 浙江大学, 2015.
    [14]王汉斌,岳帅. 网约车指导定价模型研究[J]. 价格月刊,2016,10:32
    [15]张媛媛. 重庆市主城区公共交通出行成本研究[D].重庆交通大学,2013.
    [16]瞿丹,陈潜洋. 公共交通出行综合成本现状研究[J]. 市场研究,2013,11:18-20.
    [17]张天然. 基于交通网络均衡理论的交通需求管理政策评价研究[D].同济大学博士学位论文.2008
    [18]王方. 基于SP 调查的行为时间价值研究[D]. 北京工业大学, 2005.
    [19]景鹏,隽志才,贾玲玉. 采用均匀设计SP调查的出行方式选择建模与敏感性分析[J]. 预测,2012,04:75-80.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

WU Jiaorong, WANG Yuqin, LIN Ziyang, WANG Zuoling. Impact of Time-Sharing Automobile on Modal Shift Behavior in Urban Complex[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2020,48(01):60~67

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1140
  • PDF: 871
  • HTML: 65
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:April 30,2019
  • Revised:November 06,2019
  • Adopted:September 29,2019
  • Online: January 20,2020
Article QR Code