2025-4-6- Monday
HomeIntroductionEditorial boardContact usChinese
Home > Archive>Volume 48, Issue 6, 2020 >779-787. DOI:10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.19386
PDF HTML XML Export Cite reminder
Comparative Study of Sharing Indicator in Green Building Rating Systems
CSTR:
[cstr]
Author:
Affiliation:

College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai200092, China

Clc Number:

TU201.1

  • Article
    • | |
  • Metrics
    • |
  • Reference [31]
    • |
  • Related [20]
    • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    A comparative study was made of the indicators about the sharing among different green building rating tools (GBRTs) used in USA, UK, Germany and China. Results show that the sharing is becoming a more and more important part of GBRT. In different GBRTs, the distribution of sharing indicators is different, and so is the contribution rate , which is up to 6.23%. For Chinese GBRT, sharing platform of post-operation evaluation is anticipated and the sharing index is proposed to measure the sharing during the operation stage, which contributes to the development of green building evaluation and design.

    Reference
    [1] 李振宇, 朱怡晨. 迈向共享建筑学[J]. 建筑学报, 2017(12):60.
    [2] IBR深圳市建筑科学研究院有限公司. 共享设计[M]. 第2版. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
    [3] 袁小宜, 叶青, 刘宗源，等. 实践平民化的绿色建筑—深圳建科大楼设计[J]. 建筑学报, 2010(1):14
    [4] LI Y, CHEN X, WANG X, et al. A review of studies on green building assessment methods by comparative analysis[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2017, 146:152.
    [5] 金周英. 软技术: 创新的空间与实质[M]. 北京: 新华出版社, 2002.
    [6] 李振宇, 刘银, 邓丰. 长江三角洲地区节约型居住软技术体系研究导论[J]. 时代建筑, 2008(2):35.
    [7] 李路明. 国外绿色建筑评价体系略览[J]. 世界建筑, 2002(5):68.
    [8] US EPA. Basic information, green building [EB/OL]. [2019-06-17]. https://archive.epa.gov/greenbuilding/web/html/about.html.
    [9] 徐子苹, 刘少瑜. 英国建筑研究所环境评估法BREEAM引介[J]. 新建筑, 2002(1):53.
    [10] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 绿色建筑评价标准[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2019.
    [11] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 绿色建筑评价标准[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2014.
    [12] DíAZ L C, CARPIO M, MARTíN M M, et al. A comparative analysis of sustainable building assessment methods[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2019, 49:101611.
    [13] ALI H H, AL N S F . Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries— case of Jordan[J]. Building and Environment, 2009, 44(5):1053.
    [14] DOAN D T, GHAFFARIANHOSEINI A, NAISMITH N, et al. A critical comparison of green building rating systems[J]. Building and Environment, 2017, 123:243.
    [15] 赵敬源, 黄志勇. LEED V4与《绿色建筑评价标准》的对比研究[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 49(3):408.
    [16] SALLAM I, ABDELAAL M R M. Relative weight of water efficiency credits: as an indicator to enhance buildings’ environmental assessment tools performance[J]. Architectural Science Review, 2016, 59(5):423.
    [17] MATTONI B, GUATTARI C, EVANGELISTI L, et al. Critical review and methodological approach to evaluate the differences among international green building rating tools[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 82:950.
    [18] ZHANG Y, WANG J, HU F, et al. Comparison of evaluation standards for green building in China, Britain, United States[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 68:262.
    [19] GENG Y, DONG H, XUE B, et al. An overview of Chinese green building standards[J]. Sustainable Development, 2012, 20(3):211.
    [20] HUO X, YU A TW, WU Z. A comparative analysis of site planning and design among green building rating tools[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 147:352.
    [21] CHEN X, YANG H, LU L. A comprehensive review on passive design approaches in green building rating tools[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 50:1425.
    [22] 李涛, 刘丛红. LEED与《绿色建筑评价标准》结构体系对比研究[J]. 建筑学报, 2011(3):75.
    [23] Green Building Council US. LEEED: reference guide for building design and construction[M]. Washington: US Green Building Counci, 2013.
    [24] Green Building Council US. LEED: reference guide for building design and construction[M]. Washington: US Green Building Counci, 2009.
    [25] Building Research Establishment. BREEAM manual 2014 [EB/OL]. [2019-09-09]. https://www.breeam.com/BREEAMUK2014SchemeDocument/content/Resources/Output/2014_nc_uk/2014_nc_uk.pdf.
    [26] Building Research Establishment. BREEAM UK New construction 2018 [EB/OL] . [2019-06-26]. https://www.breeam.com/NC2018/content/resources/output/10_pdf/a4_pdf/print/nc_uk_a4_print_mono/nc_uk_a4_print_mono.pdf.
    [27] 卢求. 德国DGNB——世界第二代绿色建筑评估体系[J]. 世界建筑, 2010(1):105.
    [28] German Sustainable Building Council. DGNB-System-2018-EN [EB/OL]. [2019-06-19]. https://static.dgnb.de/fileadmin/en/dgnb_system/services/request-criteria/DGNB-System-2018-EN.pdf.
    [29] German Sustainable Building Council. DGNB-CORE14-EN [EB/OL]. [2019-06-19]. https://static.dgnb.de/fileadmin/en/dgnb_system/services/request-criteria/DGNB-CORE14-EN.pdf.
    [30] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 绿色建筑评价标准[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2006.
    [31] 顾闻, 李振宇. 欧洲共享住宅的发展历程和共享模式探究[J]. 城市建筑, 2018(34):70.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

YANG Ye, LI Zhenyu, ZHENG Zhenhua. Comparative Study of Sharing Indicator in Green Building Rating Systems[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2020,48(6):779~787

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:845
  • PDF: 920
  • HTML: 499
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:September 19,2019
  • Revised:May 17,2020
  • Adopted:March 27,2020
  • Online: July 09,2020
Article QR Code

Youare the 27104 visitor to this site

Copyright:JOURNAL OF TONGJI UNIVERSITY     Director:The Ministry of Education    The host:Tongji university.

Address:上海市四平路1239号同济大学内    Postcode:200092    TEL:86-21-65982344     E-mail:zrxb@tongji.edu.cn

Supported byBeijing E-Tiller Technology Development Co.,Ltd.