Computational Limit Analysis of Shield Tunnel Face with a Consideration of Permeability Anisotropy
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China

Clc Number:

U25

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [20]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The shield method is widely applied in the construction of subways and instability of the excavated surface of shield tunnels will be induced if insufficient support pressure is exerted, resulting in significant economic losses and casualties. The hydraulic states will be changed by the excavation and the induced water flow not only introduces the seepage force but also deteriorates the mechanical behavior of the surrounding soils. Therefore, more attention should be paid to the stability of the tunnel face under seepage conditions. The permeability of the surrounding soils is mostly simplified to be isotropic, which is in fact anisotropic due to the effect of the depositional environments. Based on the bounding theory, a three-dimensional computational limit analysis method is established by the combination of the simplex strain finite element method and the semi-definite programming. Through the incorporation of seepage analysis, the effect of permeability anisotropy on the seepage field, the limit supporting pressure and the collapse mechanism of the shield tunnel face is discussed. The present paper can provide important guidance to the construction of shield tunnels.

    Table 1
    Fig.1 Linear strain element in upper bound analysis
    Fig.2 Diagram of the shield tunnel and the used mesh
    Fig.3 Verification of the present formulation
    Fig.4 Pore pressure contours considering the anisotropy of the permeability
    Fig.5 Seepage rate along the excavation face considering the anisotropy of the permeability
    Fig.6 Comparison of seepage rates on the excavation face
    Fig.7 Effect of permeability anisotropy on the collapse mechanism
    Fig.8 Effect of permeability anisotropy on limit supporting pressure for different water levels
    Fig.9 Effect of permeability anisotropy on limit supporting pressure for different buried depths
    Fig.10 Effect of permeability anisotropy on limit supporting pressure with respect to different friction angles
    Reference
    [1] LECA E, DORMIEUX L. Upper and lower bound solutions for the face stability of shallow circular tunnels in frictional material[J]. Géotechnique, 1990, 40(4): 581.
    [2] SOUBRA A H. Three-dimensional face stability analysis of shallow circular tunnels[C/CD]//ISRM International Symposium. Melbourne: International Society for Rock Mechanics, 2000.
    [3] SUBRIN D, WONG H. Tunnel face stability in frictional material: a new 3D failure mechanism[J]. Comptes Rendus Mecanique, 2002, 330:513.
    [4] MOLLON G, DIAS D, SOUBRA A H. Face stability analysis of circular tunnels driven by a pressurized shield[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2009, 136(1): 215.
    [5] 宋春霞, 黄茂松, 吕玺琳. 非均质地基中平面应变隧道开挖面稳定上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(9): 2645.
    [6] SLOAN S W. Geotechnical stability analysis[J]. Géotechnique, 2013, 63(7):531.
    [7] 杨峰. 浅埋隧道围岩稳定性的极限分析上限法研究[D]. 长沙:中南大学, 2009.
    [8] LEE I M, NAM S W. The study of seepage forces acting on the tunnel lining and tunnel face in shallow tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2001, 16(1): 31.
    [9] LEE I M, NAM S W. Effect of tunnel advance rate on seepage forces acting on the underwater tunnel face[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2004, 19(3): 273.
    [10] 黄阜. 隧道围岩塌落机理与锚杆支护结构的上限分析研究[D]. 长沙:中南大学, 2012.
    [11] LIU W, ALBERS B, ZHAO Y, et al. Upper bound analysis for estimation of the influence of seepage on tunnel face stability in layered soils[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University—Science A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 2016, 17(11):886.
    [12] 吕玺琳,李冯缔,黄茂松,等. 渗流条件下三维盾构隧道开挖面极限支护压力[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(S1) :108.
    [13] 郑佳艳,吕玺琳,李冯缔. 高水位条件下盾构隧道开挖面稳定性数值模拟[J]. 公路交通技术, 2014, 6(3) :86.
    [14] 宋曙光. 渗流作用下复合地层盾构隧道施工开挖面稳定性及控制研究[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2016.
    [15] 汤军旅. 干砂和饱和砂性土中盾构开挖面稳定数值和离心试验研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2014.
    [16] 梁燕,邢鲜丽,李同录,等. 晚更新世黄土渗透性的各向异性及其机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(5):1313.
    [17] 杨林德,杨志锡. 各向异性饱和土体的渗流耦合分析和数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学与工程学报,2002,21(10):1447.
    [18] 何秉顺,留谦. 各向异性渗流对堤坝稳定性的影响[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2006,4(4):277.
    [19] MAKRODIMOPOULOS A, MARTIN C M. Upper bound limit analysis using simplex strain elements and second-order cone programming[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2007, 31(6): 835.
    [20] KRABBENHOFT K, LYAMIN A V , SLOAN S W. Three‐dimensional Mohr-Coulomb limit analysis using semidefinite programming[J]. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2007,23(9):1107.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

YUAN Shuai, FENG Dewang. Computational Limit Analysis of Shield Tunnel Face with a Consideration of Permeability Anisotropy[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2020,48(12):1717~1725

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:445
  • PDF: 172
  • HTML: 336
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:June 19,2020
  • Online: December 31,2020
Article QR Code