Experimental Study of the Influence of Surface Surcharge on Tunnel Lateral Deformation in Soft and Hard Soil
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;2.Shanghai Shentong Metro Group, Shanghai 200070, China

Clc Number:

TU443

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [24]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The influence mechanism of surface surcharge position on tunnel lateral deformation in soft and hard soil is studied by using the scale model test. Considering different surcharge position and tunnel traversing soil layer properties, the changes of ellipticity, the joint opening, and the additional earth pressure of tunnel segment during the graded loading-unloading process are measured. The test results show that when the load is the same, the tunnel ellipticity decreases rapidly first and then tends to smoothen with the increase of eccentricity of surcharge, the ellipticity of the tunnel in soft soil layer is larger than that of the tunnel in hard soil layer due to loading, and the decrease of tunnel ellipticity in soft soil layer is more obvious with the increase of eccentricity. Increasing the eccentricity of surcharge can effectively reduce the opening of the tunnel joint. The deformation mainly occurs in the left and right shoulder and the top joint of the tunnel when the load is directly above, and mainly in the shoulder and the top joint on the opposite side of the load during eccentric loading. Under the action of surcharge, the earth pressure of the tunnel in the sandy soil layer is uniformly distributed, while that in the soft soil layer is mainly concentrated in the horizontal direction. With the increase of eccentricity, the earth pressure decreases gradually and the main concentrated point shifts to the oblique section of the opposite side of the load. Finally, based on the results of finite element parameter analysis, the protection suggestions on the surface surcharge in the operating tunnel are proposed.

    Table 3
    Table 1
    Table 2
    Fig.1 Cross section of prototype shield tunnel(unit: mm)
    Fig.2 Device of model test
    Fig.3 Situation of tunnel passing through different soil layer (unit: mm)
    Fig.4 Eccentric distance of surcharge (unit: mm)
    Fig.5 Arrangement of sensors
    Fig.6 Comparison of deformation of segment ring A and B
    Fig.7 Ellipticity of tunnel
    Fig.8 Joint opening of tunnel in sandy soil
    Fig.9 Deformation of tunnel joint under direct and eccentric loading
    Fig.10 Joint opening of tunnel in sawdust soil layer
    Fig.11 Additional earth pressure on outer surface of tunnel structure (unit: kPa)
    Fig.12 Finite element model(unit:mm)
    Fig.13 Comparison of finite element method and experimental results
    Fig.14 Parameter analysis
    Reference
    [1] 邵华,黄宏伟,张东明,等. 突发堆载引起软土地铁盾构隧道大变形整治研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(6): 1036.
    [2] HUANG H W, SHAO Hua, ZHANG D M, et al. Deformational responses of operated shield tunnel to extreme surcharge: A case study[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2017, 13(3): 345.
    [3] 刘庭金,陈思威,叶振威. 堆载诱发盾构隧道病害及结构安全分析[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2019, 36(11): 67.
    [4] 黄大维,周顺华,赖国泉,等. 地表超载作用下盾构隧道劣化机理与特性[J]. 岩土工程学报,2017, 39(7): 1173.
    [5] 梁发云,袁强,李家平,等. 堆载作用下土体分层特性对地铁隧道纵向变形的影响研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(1): 63.
    [6] LIU X, BAI Y, YUAN Y, et al. Experimental investigation of the ultimate bearing capacity of continuously jointed segmental tunnel linings[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering,2016, 12(10): 1364.
    [7] 柳献,张浩立,鲁亮,等. 超载工况下盾构隧道结构承载能力的试验研究[J]. 地下工程与隧道, 2013(4): 10.
    [8] CUI G, CUI J, FANG Y, et al. Scaled model tests on segmental linings of shield tunnels under earth and water pressures[J]. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 2020, 20(6): 338.
    [9] ATKINSON J H, POTTS D M. Stability of a shallow circular tunnel in cohesionless soil[J]. Geotechnique, 1977, 27(2): 203.
    [10] YANG F, ZHENG X C, JIAN Z, et al. Upper bound analysis of stability of dual circular tunnels subjected to surcharge loading in cohesive-frictional soils[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 61(1): 150.
    [11] 黄大维,周顺华,冯青松,等. 地表超载对软、硬地层中既有盾构隧道影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(5): 942.
    [12] 张明告,周顺华,黄大维,等. 地表超载对地铁盾构隧道的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(8): 2271.
    [13] HUANG H W, ZHANG D M. Resilience analysis of shield tunnel lining under extreme surcharge: characterization and field application[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 51: 301.
    [14] YAMAMOTO K, LYAMIN A V, WILSON D W, et al. Stability of dual square tunnels in cohesive-frictional soil subjected to surcharge loading[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2014, 51(8): 829.
    [15] HUANG Z, ZHANG H, FU H L, et al. Deformation response induced by surcharge loading above shallow shield tunnels in soft soil[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2020, 24(2): 1.
    [16] 吴庆,杜守继. 地面堆载对既有盾构隧道结构影响的试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2014, 10(1): 57.
    [17] 孙华圣,周涛,董云,等. 地面堆载对下方已建隧道变形影响分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(S2): 900.
    [18] YUAN Y, YANG Y S, ZHANG S H, et al. A benchmark 1 g shaking table test of shallow segmental mini-tunnel in sand[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 18(11): 5383.
    [19] 袁勇,包蓁,禹海涛,等. 考虑行波效应的盾构隧道多点振动台试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30(8): 174.
    [20] 黄大维,周顺华,冯青松,等. 盾构隧道与地层相互作用的模型试验设计[J]. 铁道学报, 2018, 40(6): 127.
    [21] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 盾构法隧道施工及验收规范: GB50446—2017[S]. 北京 : 中国建筑工业出版社, 2017.
    [22] YI H Y, QI T Y, QIAN W P, et al. Influence of long-term dynamic load induced by high-speed trains on the accumulative deformation of shallow buried tunnel linings[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2019, 84: 166.
    [23] 王如路,张冬梅. 超载作用下软土盾构隧道横向变形机理及控制指标研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(6): 1092.
    [24] 梁发云,贾亚杰,丁钰津,等. 上海地区软土HSS模型参数的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(2): 269.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

LIANG Fayun, FANG Yanqi, YUAN Qiang, LI Jiaping. Experimental Study of the Influence of Surface Surcharge on Tunnel Lateral Deformation in Soft and Hard Soil[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2021,49(3):322~331

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:480
  • PDF: 1427
  • HTML: 317
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:July 05,2020
  • Online: April 06,2021
Article QR Code