A Data Asset Quality Evaluation Model Based on a Multi-criteria Decision-making Method
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Clc Number:

C93

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [19]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    This paper proposes a multi criteria decision making (MCDM) framework for evaluating the quality of data assets by combining the best worst method (BWM), technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) and triangular fuzzy number. In this framework, firstly, the evaluation indexes are constructed through expert interviews. Then, the BWM method is used to determine the weight of the evaluation indexes. After that, experts are invited to linguistically evaluate the quality of the data set based on the constructed indexes, and triangular fuzzy numbers are introduced to overcome the problem of incomplete expression of individual real numbers. Finally, the TOPSIS method is utilized to rank the quality of the data assets. The feasibility of the methodology is verified by applying the proposed approach to data asset quality assessment of commercial banks.

    Reference
    [1] 中国信息通信研究院.数字经济治理白皮书(2019年)[R].北京:中国信息通信研究院,2019.
    [2] MAYER-SCHONBERGER V, CUKIER K. Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think[M]. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013.
    [3] 尤建新. 大数据时代呼唤数据质量治理[J]. 上海质量, 2019(10):20.
    [4] 中国信息通信研究院.数据资产管理实践白皮书[R].北京:中国信息通信研究院,2019.
    [5] 王汉生.数据资产论[M].中国人民大学出版社.北京,2019
    [6] 虞正,高红冰,徐盈,等.数据资产化之路-数据资产的估值和行业实践[R].上海:德勤&阿里研究院,2019.
    [7] 孙俐丽,吴建华, 袁勤俭. B2C企业数据资产质量影响因素研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2017(7):99.
    [8] OMARA E, SAID T, MOUSA M. Employing neural networks for assessment of data quality with emphasis on data completeness[J]. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, AIML, 2011, 11(1): 21.
    [9] 黄莺. 元数据质量的定量评估方法综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013(4):145.
    [10] PELTIER J, ZAHAY D, LEHMANN D. Organizational learning and crm success: a model for linking organizational practices, customer data quality, and performance[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2013, 27(1): 1.
    [11] JORGE M , ISMAEL C , BIBIANO R , et al. A data quality in use model for big data[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2016, 63(10):123.
    [12] 宋立荣. 基层科技报告资源建设中元数据质量评估研究——以中国科学技术信息研究所为例[J]. 中国科技资源导刊, 2016, 48(1):57.
    [13] YOON K P, HWANG C L. Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction[M]. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications, 1995.
    [14] HWANG C L, MASUD A S M. Multiple objective decision making-methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey[M]. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
    [15] SAATY T L. What is the analytic hierarchy process? In mathematical models for decision support[M]. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 1988.
    [16] FENG C, MA R. Identification of the factors that influence service innovation in manufacturing enterprises by using the fuzzy DEMATEL method[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 253.DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120002
    [17] REZAEI J. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method[J]. Omega, 2015, 53: 49.
    [18] LIANG D, LIU D, PEDRYCZ W, et al. Triangular fuzzy decision-theoretic rough sets[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2013, 54(8):1087.
    [19] 邵国霞, 曹政国. 基于三角模糊数-TOPSIS的既有高铁近接地基加固方案优选[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2019, 63(2):40.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

YOU Jianxin, XU Tao. A Data Asset Quality Evaluation Model Based on a Multi-criteria Decision-making Method[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2021,49(4):585~590

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:772
  • PDF: 1570
  • HTML: 474
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:December 01,2020
  • Online: May 11,2021
Article QR Code