Morphological Evolution Characteristics of a Nourished Beach Under Multi-project Influence and Coupled Wave-current Interaction
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;2.The Eighth Geological Brigade of Hebei Geological Prospecting Bureau, Qinhuangdao 066001, China

Clc Number:

P753

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [39]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    In order to investigate the morphological evolution characteristics of the nourished beach, the sediment transport and morphological model was applied and well verified against the measured data on the base of the well-validated wave-current coupled hydrodynamic model using the double nested grid technology. The model results and the measured beach profiles indicate some characteristics of the sediment concentration and the beach morphology: the sediment concentration distribution under the coupled tidal current and normal waves is consistent with that under the coupled tidal current and strong waves, and the averaged sediment concentration and the sediment concentration difference between post- and pre-engineering are larger at the maximum ebb than flood; in post-engineering scenario, the high sediment concentration area locates on the onshore side of the sandbars under the normal waves and on the offshore side under the strong waves; in post-engineering scenario, the erosion and deposition takes place at the sandbars and at the onshore area respectively, and the sandbars move onshore, which indicates that the nourishment project can protect the beach regardless of whether a storm surge occurs.

    Reference
    [1] RANGEL-BUITRAGO N, WILLIAMS A T, ANFUSO G. Hard protection structures as a principal coastal erosion management strategy along the Caribbean coast of Colombia. A chronicle of pitfalls [J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2018, 156: 58.
    [2] BARRAGAN J M, DE ANDRES M. Analysis and trends of the world's coastal cities and agglomerations [J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2015, 114: 11.
    [3] BORUFF B J, EMRICH C, CUTTER S L. Erosion hazard vulnerability of US coastal counties [J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2005, 21(5): 932.
    [4] KALIRAJ S, CHANDRASEKAR N, MAGESH N S. Evaluation of coastal erosion and accretion processes along the southwest coast of Kanyakumari, Tamil Nadu using geospatial techniques [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2015, 8(1): 239.
    [5] 李震, 雷怀彦. 中国砂质海岸分布特征与存在问题 [J]. 海洋地质动态, 2006 (6): 1.
    [6] SHIM K T, KIM K H, PARK J H. The effectiveness of adaptive beach protection methods under wind application [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(11): 385.
    [7] CASTELLE B, TURNER I L, BERTIN X, et al. Beach nourishments at Coolangatta Bay over the period 1987—2005: Impacts and lessons [J]. Coastal Engineering, 2009, 56(9): 940.
    [8] CELLI D, LI Y Z, ONG M C, et al. The role of submerged berms on the momentary liquefaction around conventional rubble mound breakwaters [J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2019, 85: 1.
    [9] HAMM L, CAPOBIANCO M, DETTE H H, et al. A summary of European experience with shore nourishment [J]. Coastal Engineering, 2002, 47(2): 237.
    [10] TSVETANOV T G, SHAH F A. The economic value of delaying adaptation to sea-level rise: an application to coastal properties in connecticut [J]. Climatic Change, 2013, 121(2): 177.
    [11] SAPONIERI A, VALENTINI N, DI RISIO M, et al. Laboratory investigation on the evolution of a sandy beach nourishment protected by a mixed soft-hard system [J]. Water, 2018, 10(9): 1171.
    [12] 戚洪帅, 刘根, 蔡锋, 等. 海滩修复养护技术发展趋势与前景 [J]. 应用海洋学学报, 2020, 40(1): 111.
    [13] PINTO C A, SILVEIRA T M, TEIXEIRA S B. Beach nourishment practice in mainland Portugal (1950—2017): overview and retrospective [J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2020, 192: 105211.
    [14] COOKE B C, JONES A R, GOODWIN I D, et al. Nourishment practices on Australian sandy beaches: A review [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 113: 319.
    [15] 蔡锋, 刘根. 我国海滩养护修复的发展与技术创新 [J]. 应用海洋学学报, 2019, 38(4): 452.
    [16] KUANG C, HE L, GU J, et al. Effects of submerged breakwater on hydrodynamics and shoreline change of the east beach of Beidaihe, Bohai Bay, China [J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2014, 30(3): 598.
    [17] PAN Y, KUANG C, GU J, et al. Assessment of a measure for water exchange strengthening of artificial headland bays based on shoreline change and flushing time [J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2014, 30(3): 615.
    [18] 刘修锦, 王永红, 杨燕雄, 等. 海滩养护后剖面变化过程研究——以北戴河西海滩和中海滩为例 [J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2013, 29(2): 53.
    [19] 谢亚琼, 刘松涛, 刘冀闽, 等. 秦皇岛金梦海湾海滩生态修复设计 [J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2013, 29(2): 79.
    [20] 杨燕雄, 张甲波, 刘松涛. 秦皇岛海滩养护工程的实践与方法 [J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2014, 30(3): 1.
    [21] PAN Y, KUANG C P, CHEN Y P, et al. A comparison of the performance of submerged and detached artificial headlands in a beach nourishment project [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 159: 295.
    [22] LONGUET-HIGGINS M S, STEWART R W. Radiation stress and mass transport in gravity waves, with application to surf beats [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1962, 13(4): 481.
    [23] LONGUET-HIGGINS M S, STEWART R W. Radiation stresses in water waves; a physical discussion, with applications [J]. Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, 1964, 11(4): 529.
    [24] BENDER III L C, WONG K C. The effect of wave‐current interaction on tidally forced estuarine circulation [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1993, 98(C9): 16521.
    [25] HAUS B K. Surface current effects on the fetch‐limited growth of wave energy [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2007, 112(C3): C03003.
    [26] MOON I J , HARA T, GINIS I, et al. Effect of surface waves on air-sea momentum exchange. Part I: effect of mature and growing seas [J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2004, 61(19): 2321.
    [27] 邹志利. 海岸动力学 [M]. 北京:人民交通出版社, 2009.
    [28] HANSEN J E, ELIAS E, LIST J H, et al. Tidally influenced alongshore circulation at an inlet-adjacent shoreline [J]. Continental Shelf Research, 2013, 56: 26.
    [29] HOPKINS J, ELGAR S, RAUBENHEIMER B. Observations and model simulations of wave‐current interaction on the inner shelf [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2016, 121(1): 198.
    [30] BROEKEMA Y B. Modelling of grain sorting mechanisms in the nearshore area for natural and nourished beaches [D]. Delft: TU Delft, 2015.
    [31] HUISMAN B J A, RUESSINK B G, DE SCHIPPER M A, et al. Modelling of bed sediment composition changes at the lower shoreface of the sand motor [J]. Coastal Engineering, 2018, 132: 33.
    [32] LUIJENDIJK A P, RANASINGHE R, DE SCHIPPER M A, et al. The initial morphological response of the sand engine: a process-based modelling study [J]. Coastal Engineering, 2017, 119: 1.
    [33] SHI F, CAI F, KIRBY J T, et al. Morphological modeling of a nourished bayside beach with a low tide terrace [J]. Coastal Engineering, 2013, 78: 23.
    [34] 匡翠萍, 江林锋, 马悦, 等. 人工岛与海岸整治工程下波流动力响应特征 [J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(01): 38.
    [35] 刘浩. 仙螺岛建设可行性及其对环境影响的研究 [D]. 青岛: 青岛海洋大学, 2000.
    [36] 陈雪峰, 王桂萱. MIKE 21计算软件及其在长兴岛海域改造工程上的应用 [J]. 大连大学学报, 2007 (6): 93.
    [37] J W C. On the validation of models [J]. Physical Geography, 1981, 2(2): 184.
    [38] 解鸣晓. 波流耦合下淤泥质海岸水沙运动三维模拟研究 [D]. 南京: 河海大学, 2010.
    [39] 匡翠萍, 董博灵, 谢华浪,等. 海床演变对山海关旅游海滩生态修复工程的响应特征 [J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(5): 648.
    Cited by
Get Citation

KUANG Cuiping, HAN Xuejian, GONG Lixin, JIANG Linfeng. Morphological Evolution Characteristics of a Nourished Beach Under Multi-project Influence and Coupled Wave-current Interaction[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2021,49(9):1284~1294

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:December 29,2020
  • Online: September 27,2021
Article QR Code