Use of Stimulation-Independent Evaluation in the Context of Vehicle Body Domain
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

1.FZI Research Center for Information Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany;2.Daimler AG, 70372 Stuttgart, Germany

Clc Number:

U467.4

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [26]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Currently established automotive test approaches in the field of vehicle hardware-in-the-loop (HiL) testing use predefined test structures. The test case structure couples a specific test stimulation with an individual test step to a fixed, predefined system validation with pass / fail result. Each test case has its own specific functional focus. If more than one functional aspect is to be tested, the current methods will not work anymore. The aim of future test methods is to evaluate the system as comprehensively and resource-efficiently as possible. If possible, several sub-functionalities should be evaluated at the same time in a randomly generated, realistic environment. A different validation approach is required for the evaluation of randomly generated stimulations sequences. Previously they are unknown to the evaluation environment. It is no longer possible to validate each test step individually. The exact sequence of the stimulation is not known at the beginning of the test run. This should simulate a behavior that is as realistic as possible. For this purpose, a methodology for the generation of system evaluation for randomly generated stimulations was introduced. Combinatorial and model-based approaches were combined to support the creation of system evaluation for the vehicle body domain (describes the passenger functions that can be experienced within a vehicle with its control units and functionalities, no direct influence on driving dynamics) and link them to the corresponding system requirements. The approach supports the existing methods and achieve a wider and deeper coverage of system assessments than a normal test catalogue implementation would give. This will be shown in a proof of concept with a vehicle comfort function on a HiL system at a German car manufacturer.

    Reference
    [1] JAKOBSON O . Core based service oriented architecture[EB/OL]. (2019-11-01) [2021-05-01]. https://dspace.com/shared/data/pdf/dwc2019/Volvo-Ola Jakobson.pdf.
    [2] GUISSOUMA H , KLARE H , SAX E, et al . An empirical study on the current and future challenges of automotive software release and configuration management[C]// IEEE 2018 44th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA). [S. l.]: IEEE, 2018: 298.
    [3] POFAHL E , WIESSALLA J , HOFMANN O , et al . Modellbasierte erzeugung von testfallen¨ mit integrierter modellbasierte erzeugung von testfallen¨ mit integrierter fehleranalyse[BE/OL].[2021-05-03]. https://www. semanticscholar.org/paper/Modellbasierte-Erzeugung-von-Testf%C3%.
    [4] SCHNITTENHELM H. Testing of level-3 systems[Z]. PEGASUS Projekt, 2017: 470.
    [5] TUNCALI C E , FAINEKOS G , PROKHOROV D , et al . Requirements-driven test generation for autonomous vehicles with machine learning components[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2020, 5(2): 265.
    [6] SCHONEMANN V , WINNER H , GLOCK T , et al . Scenario-based functional safety for automated driving on the example of valet parking[C]// ARAI K, KAPOOR S, BHATIA R. Advances in Information and Communication. [S. l.]: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 53.
    [7] King C , Ries L , Kober C , et al . Automated function assessment in driving scenarios[C]// 12th IEEE Conference on Software Testing, Validation and Verification. [S. l.]: IEEE, 2019: 414.
    [8] OTTEN S , BACH J , WOHLFAHRT C , et al . Automated assessment and evaluation of digital test drives[C]// ZACHAUS C, M¨ ULLER B, MEYER G. Advanced Microsystems for Automotive Applications 2017. [S. l.]: Springer International Publishing, 2017: 189.
    [9] BROY J . Modellbasierte entwicklung und optimierung flexibler zeitgesteuerter architekturen im fahrzeugserienbereich[D/OL]. Karlsruhe: Universitat Karlsruhe, 2010. https: //publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000021274.
    [10] SHOKRY H , HINCHEY M . Model-based verification of embedded software[J]. Computer, 2009, 42(4): 53.
    [11] GUSTAFSSON T , SKOGLUND M , KOBETSKI A , et al . Automotive system testing by independent guarded assertions[C]// 2015 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation workshops (ICSTW 2015). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2015: 1. https://www.diva-portal.org/ smash/get/diva2:1043558/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
    [12] Kober C . Stochastische verkehrsflusssimulation auf basis von fahrerverhaltensmodellen zur absicherung automatisierter fahrfunktionen[M]. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2019.
    [13] International Organization for Standardization . Road vehicles—functional safety: ISO 26262-1:2011 [S/OL].[2021-05-04]. https://www.iso.org/standard/43464.html.
    [14] SAX E . Automatisiertes Testen eingebetteter Systeme in der Automobilindustrie[R/OL]. Munchen: Hanser, 2008. http://www.hanser-elibrary.com/action/showBook?doi=10.3139/9783446419018.
    [15] STARON M . Automotive software development[C]// STARON M. Automotive Software Architectures. [S. l.]: Springer International Publishing, 2017: 51.
    [16] CAMPERO W . Testkonzept IEEE 829 testmanagement nach istqb standard[J]. Qytera, 2019.
    [17] PEGASUS . PEGASUS method[EB/OL]. 2020.[2021-05-20]. https://www.pegasusprojekt.de/.
    [18] IEEE Computer Cociety . IEEE standard for software and system test documentation: IEEE. 829?2008 [S]. 2008. [2021-05-20]. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5983353.
    [19] WITTE F . Testmanagement und softwaretest: Theoretische grundlagen und praktische umsetzung[M]. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09964-0.
    [20] Tech Pvt Ltd . Model based testing tutorial: What is, tools & example[G]// Model Based Testing Tutorial. [S. l.]: Tech Pvt Ltd, 2020.
    [21] BACH J. Methoden und ansatze fur die entwicklung und den test pradiktiver fahrzeugregelungs fun ktionen[Z]. KIT Bib, 2018.
    [22] WOHLFAHRT C. Von systematischer absicherung zur digitalen erprobungsfahrt[Z]. Stuttgart, 2016-10-27.
    [23] TRIOU E , ABBAS Z , KOTHAPALLE S . Declarative testing: A paradigm for testing software applications[C]// Information Technology: New Generations, 2009. ITNG ' 09. InternationalSixth. [S. l.]: IEEE Xplore, 2009: 769.
    [24] WAYKAR Y . A study of importance of uml diagrams: with special reference to very large-sized projects[C/OL]// International Conference on Reinventing Thinking Beyond Boundaries to Excel. 2013. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/322991896 A Study of Importance of UML diagrams With Special Reference to Very Large-sized Projects.
    [25] ANKE J , BENTE S . Uml in der hochschullehre: Eine¨ kritische reflexion[EB/OL]. 2019 [2021-05-25]. http://www.researchgate.net.
    [26] DANIEL F , EDUARD E , WASIF A , et al . From natural language requirements to passive test cases using guarded assertions[C/OL]// 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS). [S. l.]: IEEE, 2018. DOI:10.1109/QRS.2018.00060 .
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

FUCHS Julian, STEINHAUSER Christian, KING Christian, KAAG Kevin, SAX Eric. Use of Stimulation-Independent Evaluation in the Context of Vehicle Body Domain[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2021,49(S1):11~19

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:64
  • PDF: 300
  • HTML: 38
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:October 20,2021
  • Online: February 28,2023
Article QR Code