Risk Analysis of Digital Transformation Based on Failure Mode and Effect Analysis

doi:10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.21343

Home > Archive>Volume 50, Issue 2, 2022 >160-167. DOI:10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.21343

Risk Analysis of Digital Transformation Based on Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
DOI:
                        10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.21343
                    
CSTR:
                        [cstr]
                    
Author:
                        YOU JianxinYOU Jianxin
School of Economics and Management， Tongji University， Shanghai 200092， China
Find this author on All Journals
Find this author on BaiDu
Search for this author on this site
PENG BodaPENG Boda
School of Economics and Management， Tongji University， Shanghai 200092， China
Find this author on All Journals
Find this author on BaiDu
Search for this author on this site
XU TaoXU Tao
School of Economics and Management， Tongji University， Shanghai 200092， China
Find this author on All Journals
Find this author on BaiDu
Search for this author on this site

                    
Affiliation:School of Economics and Management， Tongji University， Shanghai 200092， China
Clc Number:C93
Fund Project:

Article

Figures

Metrics

Reference [25]

Related [20]

Cited by

Materials

Comments

Abstract:

An improved failure mode and effect analysis （FMEA） method based on fuzzy theory， grey relational analysis（GRA） and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution （TOPSIS） was proposed to construct risk analysis model for enterprise digital transformation. Firstly， factors of six dimension that had influence on digital transformation were proposed by literature analysis， expert interview and questionnaire survey. Next， through fuzzy theory， the qualitative evaluation index of expert group was translated into quantitative index. Then， comprehensive weight of risk factors was considered， and failure modes were sorted through GRA and TOPSIS. Finally， the model was applied to a digital transformation enterprise in the testing industry to verify its feasibility. Moreover， management measures were suggested based on the analysis results.

Key words:digital transformation;failure mode and effect analysis;fuzzy set theory;grey relational analysis;technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution

Reference

[1] 陈劲，杨文池，于飞.数字化转型中的生态协同创新战略——基于华为企业业务集团（EBG）中国区的战略研讨[J].清华管理评论，2019（6）：22.

[2] 李君，邱君降，成雨.工业企业数字化转型过程中的业务综合集成现状及发展对策[J].中国科技论坛，2019（7）：113.

[3] MICHAEL B，ADRIAN F，GREG K，et al.The ‘how’ of transformation[R/OL].[2016-5-9]https：//www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/the-how-of- transformation，.

[4] 陈毅贤.八成企业数字化转型为何失败[N].中国企业报，2019-12-24（9）.

[5] 埃森哲.2019埃森哲中国企业数字转型指数研究[R/OL].[2019-09-10]https：//www.accenture.cn/cn-zh/insights/digital/digital-transformation-index-2019.

[6] State University’s ERM Initiative NC ，& Protiviti.Executive perspectives on top risks 2020—key issues being discussed in the boardrooms and c‐suite[R/OL].[2020-01-01]https：//www.protiviti.com/UK-en/insights/protiviti-top-risks-survey.

[7] HEAVIN C，POWER D J.Challenges for digital transformation –towards a conceptual decision support guide for managers[J].Journal of Decision Systems，2018，27（S1）：38.

[8] 陈春花.传统企业数字化转型能力体系构建研究[J].人民论坛·学术前沿，2019（18）：6.

[9] 吕铁.传统产业数字化转型的趋向与路径[J].人民论坛·学术前沿，2019（18）：13.

[10] 张夏恒.中小企业数字化转型障碍、驱动因素及路径依赖——基于对377家第三产业中小企业的调查[J].中国流通经济，2020，34（12）：72.

[11] 李舒沁.欧盟支持中小企业数字化转型发展政策主张及启示[J].管理现代化，2020，40（5）：65.

[12] HUANG Jia，YOU Jianxin，LIU Huchen，et al.Failure mode and effect analysis improvement：a systematic literature review and future research agenda[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety，2020，199.DOI：10.1016/j.ress.2020.106885.

[13] LIU Huchen，LIU Long，LIU Nan.Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis：a literature review[J].Expert Systems with Applications，2013，40（2）：828.

[14] LIU Huchen，YOU Jianxin，DUAN Chunyan.An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment[J].International Journal of Production Economics，2019，207（1）：163.

[15] BHATTACHARJEE P，DEY V，MANDAL U K.Risk assessment by failure mode and effects analysis （FMEA） using an interval number based logistic regression model[J].Safety Science，2020，132.DOI：10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104967.

[16] 尤建新，徐涛，毛人杰.基于失效模式与后果分析的农场到家庭模式风险分析[J].同济大学学报（自然科学版），2017，45（4）：604.

[17] 尤建新，郭仁祝，杨迷影.基于失效模式与后果分析的混合燃料发动机风险分析[J].同济大学学报（自然科学版），2019，47（5）：731.

[18] 李彦斌，于心怡，王致杰.采用灰色关联度与TOPSIS法的光伏发电项目风险评价研究[J].电网技术，2013，37（6）：1514.

[19] 尤建新，徐涛.基于多准则决策方法的数据资产质量评价模型[J].同济大学学报（自然科学版），2021，49（4）：585.

[20] 门峰，姬升启.基于模糊集与灰色关联的改进FMEA方法[J].工业工程与管理，2008（2）：55.

[21] LIU Huchen，YOU Jianxin，LIN Qinglian，et al.Risk assessment in system FMEA combining fuzzy weighted average with fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory[J].International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing，2015，28（7）：701.

[22] WANG Peng，ZHU Zhouquan，WANG Yonghu.A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW， TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design[J].Information Sciences，2016，345：27.

[23] 章穗，张梅，迟国泰.基于熵权法的科学技术评价模型及其实证研究[J].管理学报，2010，7（1）：34.

[24] 武春友，郭玲玲，于惊涛.基于TOPSIS-灰色关联分析的区域绿色增长系统评价模型及实证[J].管理评论，2017，29（1）：228.

[25] TANG Juan，ZHU Honglin，LIU Zhi，et al.Urban sustainability evaluation under the modified TOPSIS based on grey relational analysis[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health，2019.DOI：10.3390/ijerph16020256.

Get Citation

YOU Jianxin, PENG Boda, XU Tao. Risk Analysis of Digital Transformation Based on Failure Mode and Effect Analysis[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2022,50(2):160~167

Copy

Article Metrics

Abstract:691
PDF: 997
HTML: 126
Cited by: 0

History

Received:July 29,2021
Revised:
Adopted:
Online: March 16,2022
Published:

Get Citation

Share

Article Metrics

History

Article QR Code