Hazard Identification Method for Safety of the Intended Functionality Based on Finite State Machine
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China;2.Wuhan Lotus Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430090, China

Clc Number:

U463.6

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [17]
  • |
  • Related [10]
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Aimed at the dependence of hazards of the autonomous driving system (ADS) and scenarios, a method for identifying hazards of the safety of the intended functionality (SOTIF) at the vehicle level is proposed based on the finite state machine (FSM). First, the elements constituting hazardous events are specified. Then the FSM is adopted to abstract the ADS in combination with vehicle states and the operational environment. Finally, by identifying the conflicts between vehicle states and the operational environment, hazardous events of the ADS related to the SOTIF are systematically identified, which overcomes the overdependence on expert knowledge. The proposed method is applied to identify hazardous events on an SAE L3 autonomous vehicle to verify its effectiveness. The results show that compared with the system theoretic process analysis (STPA) method, the FSM model contains more detailed and systematic environmental information and the elements constituting the hazardous events are directly provided by the FSM model, which supports systematic identification of hazardous events.

    Reference
    [1] 张云,李茹,焦伟赟,等.自动驾驶功能安全标准化研究[J].中国标准化,2020(11):109.ZHANG Yun, LI Ru, JIAO Weiyun, et al. Research on standardization of functional safety of automated driving system [J]. China Standardization, 2020(11):109.
    [2] International Organization for Standardization.ISO 26262 Road vehicles-Functional safety[S]. Gereva,Switzerland: ISO,2011.
    [3] 毛向阳,尚世亮,崔海峰.自动驾驶汽车安全影响因素分析与应对措施研究[J].上海汽车,2018(1):33.MAO Xiangyang, SHANG Shiliang, CUI Haifeng. Analysis and countermeasure of safety challenging factors for autonomous driving vehicles [J]. Shanghai Auto, 2018(1):33.
    [4] International Organization for Standardization.ISO/PAS 21448: 2019 Road vehicles-Safety of the intended functionality[S]. Geneva,Switzerland: ISO, 2019.
    [5] BUCHALI T, FOCK M, DOLD S, et al. Fault-tolerant architecture for an actuator concept in highly automated cars[C]//2019 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC). Hanoi:IEEE, 2019: 1-6.
    [6] YANG J, WARD M, AKHTAR J. The development of safety cases for an autonomous vehicle: A comparative study on different methods[R].Kunshan: SAE, 2017.
    [7] PAUL C, BENJAMIN L, WALTER S, et al. Validation of safety necessities for a Safety-Bag component in experimental autonomous vehicles[C]//2018 14th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC). Iasi:IEEE, 2018: 33-40.
    [8] LEVESON N G. Engineering a safer world: Systems thinking applied to safety[M]. [S.l.]:The MIT Press, 2016.
    [9] 陈君毅, 周堂瑞, 邢星宇, 等. 基于系统理论过程分析的自动驾驶汽车安全分析方法研究[J]. 汽车技术, 2019(12): 1.CHEN Junyi, ZHOU Tangrui, XING Xingyu, et al. Research on safety analysis method for autonomous vehicles based on STPA[J]. Automobile Technology , 2019(12): 1.
    [10] 周堂瑞. 面向预期功能安全的自动驾驶汽车危害识别方法研究[D]. 上海:同济大学, 2020.ZHOU Tangrui. Research on hazard identification method for safety of the intended functionality of autonomous vehicles [D]. Shanghai:Tongji University, 2020.
    [11] ERICSON C A. Hazard analysis techniques for system safety[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
    [12] 谭同超. 有限状态机及其应用[D]. 广州:华南理工大学, 2013.TAN Tongchao. Finite state machine and its application [D]. Guangzhou:South China University of Technology, 2013.
    [13] 熊璐,康宇宸,张培志,等.无人驾驶车辆行为决策系统研究[J].汽车技术,2018(8): 1.XIONG Lu, KANG Yuchen, ZHANG Peizhi, et al. Research on behavior decision-making system for unmanned vehicle [J]. Automobile Technology, 2018(8): 1.
    [14] URMSON C, ANHALT J, BAGNELL D, et al. Autonomous driving in urban environments: Boss and the urban challenge[J]. Journal of Field Robotics, 2008, 25(8): 425.
    [15] ZIEGLER J, BENDER P, SCHREIBER M, et al. Making bertha drive—An autonomous journey on a historic route[J]. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 2014, 6(2): 8.
    [16] MONTEMERLO M, BECKER J, BHAT S, et al. Junior: The stanford entry in the urban challenge[J]. Journal of field Robotics, 2008, 25(9): 569.
    [17] International Organization for Standardization. Transport information and control system. Adaptive cruise control systems—Performance requirements and test procedures: ISO 15622—2010[S]. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2010.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

XIONG Lu, JIA Tong, CHEN Junyi, XING Xingyu, Li Bo. Hazard Identification Method for Safety of the Intended Functionality Based on Finite State Machine[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2023,51(4):616~622

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:353
  • PDF: 782
  • HTML: 84
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:December 06,2021
  • Online: April 26,2023
Article QR Code