2025-4-5- Sunday
HomeIntroductionEditorial boardContact usChinese
Home > Archive>Volume 51, Issue 4, 2023 >633-642. DOI:10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.21329
PDF HTML XML Export Cite reminder
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Method Based on a Distance Interval Number Operator
CSTR:
[cstr]
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Economics and Management， Tongji University， Shanghai 200092， China;2.School of Mechanical Engineering， Tongji University， Shanghai 201804， China;3.Business School， Yangzhou University， Yangzhou 225127， China

Clc Number:

C934

  • Article
    • | |
  • Metrics
    • |
  • Reference [28]
    • |
  • Related [20]
    • |
  • Cited by
    • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    When the attribute value of the existing failure mode and effect analysis （FMEA） method is the intuitionistic fuzzy number and the risk degree is measured by deterministic distance operator， it is difficult for evaluation experts to accurately describe the related uncertainty problems. Therefore， first an intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid Euclidean distance interval number （IFHEDIN） operator and its excellent properties are proposed based on the study of the ordered weighted distance operator， the theory of interval number and the sorting method of interval number. Then， the uncertain IFHEDIN operator is constructed to improve the FMEA method so as to analyze the reliability of failure modes of products or systems， and to calculate and rank the risk levels at the same time. Finally， the effectiveness， the reliability and accuracy of the proposed approach are verified by the risk analysis and evaluation of failure mode in the actual hospital radiation tumor treatment process， which provides decision-making support for relevant medical diagnosis managers to deal with and control risks.

    Reference
    [1] LIU Huchen, YOU Jianxin, YOU Xiaoyue. Evaluating the risk of healthcare failure modes using interval 2-tuple hybrid weighted distance measure[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2014, 78: 249.
    [2] KIRKIRE M S, RANE S B, JADHAV J R. Risk management in medical product development process using traditional FMEA and fuzzy linguistic approach: A case study[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 2015, 11(4): 595.
    [3] CHANAMOOL N, NAENNA T. Fuzzy FMEA application to improve decision-making process in an emergency department[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2016, 43: 441.
    [4] TZENG G H, HUANG J J. Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications[M]. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2011.
    [5] SANKAR N R, PRABHU B S. Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis[J]. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 2001, 18(3): 324.
    [6] LIU Huchen, YOU Jianxin, DUAN Chunyan. An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment[J]. International Journal of Product Economics, 2019, 207: 163.
    [7] LIU Huchen, LIU Long, LI Ping. Failure mode and effects analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid weighted Euclidean distance operator[J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 2014, 45(10): 2012.
    [8] XUE Yixi, YOU Jianxin, LAI Xiaodong, et al. An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MABAC approach for material selection with incomplete weight information[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2016, 38: 703.
    [9] 刘虎沉, 刘然. 基于改进FMEA的冷链物流配送过程风险分析[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2018, 18(4): 119.LIU Huchen, LIU Ran. Risk analysis of cold-chain logistics distribution based on an improved FMEA method[J]. Storage and Process, 2018, 18(4): 119.
    [10] PILLAY A, WANG J. Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2003, 79(1): 69.
    [11] MANDAL S, MAITI J. Risk analysis using FMEA: Fuzzy similarity value and possibility theory based approach[J]. Expert System with Applications, 2014, 41(7): 3527.
    [12] 叶跃祥. 区间数多属性决策的一些问题研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2007.YE Yuexiang. Research on some problems of interval number multiple attribute decision making[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2007.
    [13] MOORSE R E. Interval analysis[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1966.
    [14] MOORSE R E. Methods and applications of interval analysis[M]. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 1979.
    [15] 黄智力, 罗键. 属性值为区间数的决策对象相对相似规划模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(3): 766.HUANG Zhili, LUO Jian. Relative similarity programming model for decision making objects with multiple criteria values as interval numbers[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2019, 39(3): 766.
    [16] 李德清, 韩国柱, 曾文艺, 等. 基于布尔矩阵的区间数排序方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2016, 31(4): 629.LI Deqing, HAN Guozhu, ZENG Wenyi, et al. Ranking method of interval numbers based on Boolean matrix[J]. Control and Decision, 2016, 31(4): 629.
    [17] 吴江, 黄登仕. 区间数排序方法研究综述[J]. 系统工程, 2004, 22(8): 1.WU Jiang, HUANG Dengshi. An review on ranking methods of interval numbers[J]. System Engineering, 2004,22(8): 1.
    [18] 高峰记. 可能度及区间数综合排序[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(8): 2033.GAO Fengji. Possibility degree and comprehensive priority of interval numbers[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice. 2013, 33(8): 2033.
    [19] 陈秀明, 刘业政. 多粒度犹豫模糊语言信息下的群推荐方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2016, 36(8): 2078.CHEN Xiuming, LIU Yezheng. Multi-granular hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in group recommedation[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2016, 36(8): 2078.
    [20] 刘小弟, 朱建军, 张世涛, 等. 一种新犹豫模糊符号距离及其应用[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(2): 442.LIU Xiaodi, ZHU Jianjun, ZHANG Shitao, et al. A novel hesitant fuzzy signed distance and its application[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2019, 39(2): 442.
    [21] 孙海龙, 姚卫星. 区间数排序方法评述[J]. 系统工程学报, 2010, 25(3): 18.SUN Hailong, YAO Weixing. Comments on methods for ranking interval numbers[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2010, 25(3): 18.
    [22] ATANASSOV K, GARGOV G. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1989, 31: 343.
    [23] ZHANG Xiaolu, XU Zeshui. Soft computing based on maximizing consensus and fuzzy TOPSIS approach to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2015, 26: 42.
    [24] YAGER R R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making[J]. IEEE Transaction System, Man and Cybernetics, 1988, 18(1): 183.
    [25] 李德清, 曾文艺, 尹乾. 区间数排序方法综述[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 56(4): 483.LI Deqing, ZENG Wenyi, YIN Qian. Ranking interval numbers: A review[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 2020, 56(4): 483.
    [26] MERIGó J M, GIL-LAFUENTE A M. New decision making techniques and their application in the selection of financial products[J]. Information Sciences, 2010, 180(11): 2085.
    [27] XU Zeshui. An overview of methods for determining OWA weights[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2005, 20(8): 843.
    [28] DENNY D S, ALLEN D K, WORTHINGTON N, et al. The use of failure mode and effect analysis in a radiation oncology setting: The cancer treatment centers of America experience[J]. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 2014, 36 (1): 18.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

DONG Yongxin, YOU Jianxin, DUAN Chunyan, LIN Hui. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Method Based on a Distance Interval Number Operator[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2023,51(4):633~642

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:222
  • PDF: 488
  • HTML: 73
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:July 18,2021
  • Online: April 26,2023
Article QR Code

Youare the 26828 visitor to this site

Copyright:JOURNAL OF TONGJI UNIVERSITY     Director:The Ministry of Education    The host:Tongji university.

Address:上海市四平路1239号同济大学内    Postcode:200092    TEL:86-21-65982344     E-mail:zrxb@tongji.edu.cn

Supported byBeijing E-Tiller Technology Development Co.,Ltd.