A Model for Evaluating Pilots’ Competency Based on Entropy Weight-AHP Method and TOPSIS

doi:10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.22329

Home > Archive>Volume 51, Issue 12, 2023 >1983-1990. DOI:10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.22329

A Model for Evaluating Pilots’ Competency Based on Entropy Weight-AHP Method and TOPSIS
DOI:
                        10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.22329
                    
CSTR:
                        [cstr]
                    
Author:
                        GUO Chao1,2GUO Chao
School of Economics and Management， Tongji University， Shanghai 200092， China;Civil Aircraft Flight Test Center， Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China Ltd.， Shanghai 200092， China
Find this author on All Journals
Find this author on BaiDu
Search for this author on this site
YOU Jianxin1YOU Jianxin
School of Economics and Management， Tongji University， Shanghai 200092， China
Find this author on All Journals
Find this author on BaiDu
Search for this author on this site
PENG Boda1PENG Boda
School of Economics and Management， Tongji University， Shanghai 200092， China
Find this author on All Journals
Find this author on BaiDu
Search for this author on this site
XU Huajie2XU Huajie
Civil Aircraft Flight Test Center， Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China Ltd.， Shanghai 200092， China
Find this author on All Journals
Find this author on BaiDu
Search for this author on this site

                    
Affiliation:1.School of Economics and Management， Tongji University， Shanghai 200092， China;2.Civil Aircraft Flight Test Center， Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China Ltd.， Shanghai 200092， China
Clc Number:C93
Fund Project:

Article

Figures

Metrics

Reference [23]

Cited by

Materials

Comments

Abstract:

By combining the entropy weight method， the analytic hierarchy process （AHP）， and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution （TOPSIS）， a multi criteria decision-making framework for evaluating pilots’ competency is proposed. First， based on the research of pilot competency indicators framework at home and abroad， an evaluation indicators system for pilot competency is constructed. Next， the entropy weight method is used to weigh the core competency indicators of pilots. Then， the AHP is used by experts to weight psychological competence and style competence indicators， and an integrated weight indicators system is established. Finally， based on the weight of evaluation indicators， the TOPSIS method is used to rank the pilots’ competency. The feasibility of the proposed method is verified by applying it to the competency assessment of airline pilots.

Key words:pilot competency;evaluation indicators;entropy weight method;analytic hierarchy process (AHP);technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS)

Reference

[1] IATA. Evidence-based training implementation guide[EB/OL]. [2013-07-31]. https://www.iata.org/contentassets/632cceb91d1f41d18cec52e375f38e73/ebt-implementation-guide.pdf.

[2] IATA. Pilot aptitude testing: guidance material and best practices[EB/OL]. [2019-04-30]. https://www.iata.org/contentassets/19f9168ecf584fc7b4af8d6d1e35c769/pilot-aptitude-testing-guide.pdf.

[3] International Civil Aviation Organization. Doc 9868, Procedures for air navigation services — Training[EB/OL]. [2020-11-05]. https://www.icao.int/APAC/RASG/SafetyTools/19%20%20Procedures%20for%20Air%20Navigation%20Services%20Training-PANS-TRG%20Doc%209868.pdf

[4] SPENCER L M. Competence at work[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc,1993.

[5] DUBOIS D. Competency of based performance: a strategy for organizational change[M]. Boston: HRD Press,1993.

[6] NORDHAUG Odd. Competence specificities in organizations [J]. International Studies of Management & Organization,1998,28(1):8.

[7] 仲理峰, 时勘. 胜任特征研究的新进展[J]. 南开管理评论,2003,6(2):4.ZHONG Lifeng, SHI Kan. The new development of the research of competencies[J]. Nankai Business Review,2003,6(2):4.

[8] 赵海涛. 胜任力理论及其应用研究综述[J]. 科学与管理,2009,29(4):15.ZHAO Haitao. A survey on competence theory and its application[J]. Science and Management,2009,29(4):15.

[9] VELAZQUEZ Maria, CLAUDIO David, Ravi RAVINDRAN A . Experiments in multiple criteria selection problems with multiple decision makers[J]. International journal of operational research,2010,7(4):413.

[10] DYER R F, FORMAN E H. Group decision support with the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Decision support systems, 1992,8(2):99.

[11] KUMAR FNUP, CLAUDIO David. Implications of estimating confidence intervals on group fuzzy decision making scores[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2016,65:152.

[12] DAI J, WANG H, YANG L, et al. Emotional intelligence and emotional state effects on simulated flight performance[J]. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance,2019,90(2):101.

[13] 朱志航, 阎雷. 基于主成分分析法的飞行员培养质量评价研究[J]. 价值工程,2012,31(34):216.ZHU Zhihang, YAN Lei. Study on evaluating the quality of training pilots based on the principal component analysis method[J]. Value Engineering,2012,31(34):216.

[14] 王永刚, 孙睿韬. 飞行员飞行安全绩效评价研究[J]. 安全与环境学报,2018,18(4):1364.WANG Yonggang, SUN Ruitao. On the performance evaluation for the pilot flight safety[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2018,18(4):1364.

[15] 汪磊, 高杉, 张静怡, 等. 民航飞行员超限行为评价方法研究[J]. 安全与环境学报,2021,21(2):695.WANG Lei,GAO Shan,ZHANG Jingyi,et al. Evaluation of the exceedance behaviors of the airline transport pilots based on the QAR data[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment,2021,21(2):695.

[16] 中国民用航空局. 中国民航运输航空飞行员技能全生命周期管理体系建设实施路线图: 1.0版[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局, 2020.Civil Aviation Administration of China. Road map for the construction and implementation of the full life cycle management system for aviation pilot skills in civil aviation transportation of China: version 1.0[S]. Beijing: Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2020.

[17] 中国民用航空局. 关于全面深化运输航空公司飞行训练改革的指导意见[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局. 2019Civil Aviation Administration of China. Civil Aviation Administration of China. Guidance on comprehensively deepening the reform of flight training of transport Airlines [S]. Beijing: Civil Aviation Administration of China. 2019.

[18] 雷玲, 脱潇潇. 基于供给侧结构性改革的陕西现代农业科技园区综合创新发展能力评价——基于熵权法与TOPSIS相结合的模型[J]. 科技管理研究,2019,39(3):114.LEI Ling, Xiaoxiao TUO . Evaluation of comprehensive innovation and development ability of Shaanxi modern agricultural science and technology park based on structural reform on the supply side: a model based on entropy weight method and TOPSIS[J]. Science and Technology Management Research,2019,39(3):114.

[19] 宁连举, 肖玉贤, 刘经涛, 等. 跨行政区域创新策源能力评价与实证——基于熵权法、TOPSIS法、灰色关联分析[J]. 科技管理研究,2021,41(20):44.NING Lianju, XIAO Yuxian, LIU Jingtao, et al. Evaluation and demonstration on the creational and original innovation capacity of cross-administrative area: based on the entropy weight method, TOPSIS method, and gray correlation analysis[J]. Science and Technology Management Research,2021,41(20):44.

[20] 李娟, 李保安, 方晗, 等. 基于AHP-熵权法的发明专利价值评估——以丰田开放专利为例[J]. 情报杂志,2020,39(5):59.LI Juan, LI Baoan, FANG Han, et al. Evaluation of invention patent value based on AHP-entropy weight method: taking Toyota’s open-source patent as an example[J]. Journal of Intelligence,2020,39(5):59.

[21] SAATY T L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process[J]. International Journal of Services Sciences,2008,1(1), 83.

[22] 孙涵, 聂飞飞, 胡雪原. 基于熵权TOPSIS法的中国区域能源安全评价及差异分析[J]. 资源科学,2018,40(3):477.SUN Han, NIE Feifei, HU Xueyuan. Evaluation and difference analysis of regional energy securityin China based on entropy-weight TOPSIS modeling[J]. Resources Science,2018,40(3):477.

[23] SHARMA D, SRIDHAR S, CLAUDIO D. Comparison of AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-AHP methods in multi-criteria decision-making problems[J]. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering,2020,34(2):203.

Get Citation

GUO Chao, YOU Jianxin, PENG Boda, XU Huajie. A Model for Evaluating Pilots’ Competency Based on Entropy Weight-AHP Method and TOPSIS[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2023,51(12):1983~1990

Copy

Article Metrics

Abstract:257
PDF: 665
HTML: 110
Cited by: 0

History

Received:July 18,2022
Revised:
Adopted:
Online: December 29,2023
Published:

Get Citation

Related Videos

Share

Article Metrics

History

Article QR Code