Multi-Objective Predictive Optimization Based Lane Change Decision Making Method for Automated and Connected Vehicles

doi:10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.22353

Home > Archive>Volume 52, Issue 7, 2024 >1109-1117. DOI:10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.22353

Multi-Objective Predictive Optimization Based Lane Change Decision Making Method for Automated and Connected Vehicles
DOI:
                        10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.22353
                    
CSTR:
                        [cstr]
                    
Author:
                        CHENG Shuo1CHENG Shuo
Institute of Industrial Science， University of Tokyo， Tokyo 153-0041， Japan
Find this author on All Journals
Find this author on BaiDu
Search for this author on this site
XIA Xin2XIA Xin
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering， University of California， Los Angeles 90095， USA
Find this author on All Journals
Find this author on BaiDu
Search for this author on this site
NAKANO Kimihiko1NAKANO Kimihiko
Institute of Industrial Science， University of Tokyo， Tokyo 153-0041， Japan
Find this author on All Journals
Find this author on BaiDu
Search for this author on this site

                    
Affiliation:1.Institute of Industrial Science， University of Tokyo， Tokyo 153-0041， Japan;2.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering， University of California， Los Angeles 90095， USA
Clc Number:U463.6
Fund Project:

Article

Figures

Metrics

Reference [23]

Related [10]

Cited by

Materials

Comments

Abstract:

Lane change decision-making is one of the current opening challenges of automated and connected vehicles. Due to highly dynamic and complex traffic situations， multi-objective decision-making considering vehicle safety and riding efficiency is much more challenging. Therefore， this paper proposes a novel multi-objective predictive optimization-based lane change decision making method， which consists of dynamic matrix modeling and resolving of multi-objective predictive optimization problem. First， the matrix model of traffic flow is established based on the big data information from connected vehicles. Then， dynamic models representing lane change safety and riding efficiency are designed. The predictive optimization problem with constraints can be solved so that the optimal lane change decision is provided. Experimental results illustrate that the proposed method performs better and can improve vehicle safety and riding efficiency of automated and connected vehicles.

Key words:automated and connected vehicles;lane change decision making;multi-objective optimization;predictive optimization

Reference

[1] SPIELBERG N A, BROWN M, KAPANIA N R, et al. Neural network vehicle models for high-performance automated driving[J/OL]. Science Robotics, 2019, 4(28): eaaw1975. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aaw1975.

[2] THANDAVARAYAN G, SEPULCRE M, GOZALVEZ J. Generation of cooperative perception messages for connected and automated vehicles[J/OL]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2020, 69(12): 16336. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2020.3036165.

[3] CHENG S, LI L, MEI M M, et al. Multiple-objective adaptive cruise control system integrated with DYC[J/OL]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2019, 68(5): 4550. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2019.2905858.

[4] TANG C, KHAJEPOUR A. Wheel modules with distributed controllers: a multi-agent approach to vehicular control[J/OL]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2020, 69(10): 10879. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2020.3019376.

[5] LI L, WANG X, WANG K, et al. Parallel testing of vehicle intelligence via virtual-real interaction[J/OL]. Science Robotics, 2019, 4(28): eaaw4106. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aaw4106.

[6] FENG S, YAN X, SUN H, et al. Intelligent driving intelligence test for autonomous vehicles with naturalistic and adversarial environment[J/OL]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 748. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21007-8.

[7] NIEHAUS A, STENGEL R F. Probability-based decision making for automated highway driving[J/OL]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 1994, 43(3): 626. https://doi.org/10.1109/25.312814.

[8] LI M, STRAUB F, KUNERT M, et al. A novel cost function for decision-making strategies in automotive collision avoidance systems[C/OL]//2018 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES). 2018: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVES.2018.8519591.

[9] BOJARSKI M, DEL TESTA D, DWORAKOWSKI D, et al. End to end learning for self-driving cars[R/OL]//arXiv e-prints. (2016-04-01)[2021-12-11]. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016arXiv160407316B.

[10] XU X, ZUO L, LI X, et al. A reinforcement learning approach to autonomous decision making of intelligent vehicles on highways[J/OL]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2020, 50(10): 3884. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2018.2870983.

[11] WEI J, DOLAN J M. A robust autonomous freeway driving algorithm[C/OL]//2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. [S.l.]:IEEE,2009: 1015-1020. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2009.5164420.

[12] SEZER V. Intelligent decision making for overtaking maneuver using mixed observable Markov decision process[J/OL]. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2018, 22(3): 201. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2017.1334558.

[13] WANG P, CHAN C Y. Formulation of deep reinforcement learning architecture toward autonomous driving for on-ramp merge[C/OL]//2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). [S.l.]:IEEE,2017: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2017.8317735.

[14] CHEN W, XIE G, JI W, et al. Decision making for overtaking of unmanned vehicle based on deep Q-learning[C/OL]//2021 IEEE 10th Data Driven Control and Learning Systems Conference (DDCLS). [S.l.]:IEEE,2021: 350-353. https://doi.org/10.1109/DDCLS52934.2021.9455523.

[15] YOU C, LU J, FILEV D, et al. Highway traffic modeling and decision making for autonomous vehicle using reinforcement learning[C/OL]//2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). [S.l.]:IEEE,2018: 1227-1232. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2018.8500675.

[16] SUH J, CHAE H, YI K. Stochastic model-predictive control for lane change decision of automated driving vehicles[J/OL]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2018, 67(6): 4771. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2018.2804891.

[17] 刘启远, 孙剑, 田野, 等. 机非交互路段非机动车越线超车行为建模与仿真[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(11): 1585.LIU Qiyuan, SUN Jian, TIAN Ye, et al. Modeling and simulation of non-motor vehicle overtaking behaviors on non-interactive road section[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2019, 47(11):1585.

[18] 吕思雨. 车辆换道意图识别及换道轨迹预测[D]. 广州:广州大学, 2022.LV Siyu. Lane change intention recognition and lane change trajectory prediction[D]. Guangzhou: Guangzhou University, 2022.

[19] 董俊一. 考虑驾驶风格的智能驾驶换道决策模型研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2022.DONG Junyi. Research on lane change decision model considering driving styles for autonomous driving[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2022.

[20] FALCONE P, BORRELLI F, ASGARI J, et al. Predictive active steering control for autonomous vehicle systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2007, 15(3): 566.

[21] SZUMSKA E M, JURECKI R. The Effect of Aggressive Driving on Vehicle Parameters[J/OL]. Energies, 2020, 13(24): 6675. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13246675.

[22] LI Y, MIYAJIMA C, KITAOKA N, et al. Evaluation method for aggressiveness of driving behavior using drive recorders[J/OL]. IEEJ Journal of Industry Applications, 2015, 4(1): 59. https://doi.org/10.1541/ieejjia.4.59.

[23] SCHULMAN J, WOLSKI F, DHARIWAL P, et al. Proximal policy optimization algorithms[J/OL]. 2017.[2022-08-01]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06347.

Get Citation

CHENG Shuo, XIA Xin, NAKANO Kimihiko. Multi-Objective Predictive Optimization Based Lane Change Decision Making Method for Automated and Connected Vehicles[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2024,52(7):1109~1117

Copy

Article Metrics

Abstract:132
PDF: 337
HTML: 788
Cited by: 0

History

Received:August 09,2022
Revised:
Adopted:
Online: July 30,2024
Published:

Get Citation

Share

Article Metrics

History

Article QR Code